|
|
|||||||
| About Us | Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Hyperion Pilgrim
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Hyperion
Posts: 2,206
|
Good Benchmark app.
Some of my friends are saying that super pi is really biased towards intel, so I want to show them the true power of my core duo.
Recommend me a good cpu benchmark app. Thanks in advance. Whoops just saw I'm in the wrong section. Mods move it please.
__________________
![]() --PSP 4.01 M33 2-- ...Mis sueños son mentiras que algun día dejarán de serlo...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
Final Fantasy XXX
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: USA, TX
Posts: 1,746
|
Does your friends have any proof to back up that claim? Just accept the fact that Intel Core 2 is much faster than Amd processor...
__________________
Intel Core2Duo E6300 1.86Ghz L629A244 @ 3.78GHz G.Skill 2x1gb Hz--540MHz Asus P5K-E Wifi/AP Rev.1.02g Thermalright Ultra Extreme 120+ FM121 (110 cfm fan) ATI x1900 GT Rev.2 256mb 513/657 |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
Insomniac in training...
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Canada
Posts: 3,944
|
Overclocked, yes. But both at stock, they're pretty much equal. And I might be wrong here, but I thought Super PI was only optimized for single core use, not dual/quad core.
__________________
Born free, riding free, living free. Always be free. Q6600 @ 3Ghz, 333x9 Gigabyte DS3R, Rev1.0 Patriot Extreme DDR2 PC-6400RAM BFG 9800GX2 @ stock |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
Final Fantasy XXX
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: USA, TX
Posts: 1,746
|
Try X6800
. It's stock meaning no overclock.
__________________
Intel Core2Duo E6300 1.86Ghz L629A244 @ 3.78GHz G.Skill 2x1gb Hz--540MHz Asus P5K-E Wifi/AP Rev.1.02g Thermalright Ultra Extreme 120+ FM121 (110 cfm fan) ATI x1900 GT Rev.2 256mb 513/657 |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) |
|
DJ-Roadkill
![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Canada
Posts: 497
|
Actually, ure friend is right. Superpi doesn't like AMD for some reason. Mostly, Intel CPUs (even the P4) do extremely well for some reason. And AMD isn't too much worse than intel.
__________________
Asus Maximus Formula Intel Q6600 @ 3.8Ghz (Air Cooled w/T.R.U.E) ATI Radeon HD3870 (OCed 994/1200) OCZ 4GB Platinum PC2-6400 (5-4-4-15) Mushkin XP650w PSU 3X 320GB HDDs 1X 500GB HDD 36.7GB WD Raptor TT VA8000BWS black Others: Logitech G7 Mouse and G25 Wheel, Smartjoy PS2USB, Yamaha HTR-5370 A/V Reciever, Samsung SyncMaster 931c, Dual MTX MXS1204 12' 800w Subs w/ RFF 1000w Amp http://www.ilike.com/artist/djroadkill - Check out my music. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) |
|
Ramma Gay
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Somwhere out in space? The Land of the Free? Heaven or Hell?
Posts: 11,673
|
There's no AMD home-oriented processor in that pricerange either. AMD's processors up to the X2 6000+ offer impressive performance at stock speed when compared to their intel counterparts in the same priceclass. Can't blame them for not having an answer to the X6800 using old technology, CAN blame them for being late though
__________________
![]() PC Specs: CPU: Intel E4400 @ 2.66GHz GPU: ATi HD4870 / 512MB / Core: 775 / Mem: 1025 Mobo: Gigabyte EP35-DS3 (rev 2.1) SPU: Creative X-Fi Xtreme Music RAM: 2GB Corsair XMS2 DDR800 @ 4-4-4-12 ~ 800MHz HDD: 320GB Western Digital 16MB Caviar SE PSU: Hiper Type-R 580W Geometry Wars: 198.400 Lumines: 523.879 Rip: Cid's Bleemcast 28-08-2007 ![]() X360/Wii/PS3 belong to the current generation, update your mindset FFS |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) |
|
It's a Spinning Smile!
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 5,220
|
PCSX2 - The ultimate in benchmarking
SiSoftware Sandra Lite is pretty usefull to.
__________________
![]() » Beta Tester for PCSX2 | ZeroGS KOSMOS | Satourne | nullDC | Dolphin | Misc Projects « » AMD64 X2 4400+ 939 1MB L2 @ 2.20GHz | GeForce 8800 GTX 768: 575/1800 | 2GB OCZ DC RAM @ 2-3-2-5 | 768GiB HDD « |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) |
|
EmuAddict-_-;;
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Sarawak, Malaysia
Posts: 2,338
|
3Dmark 2006.
__________________
![]() Windows XP SP2 | Monitor BenQ FP 91G+|AMD Athlon 64 3000+(9x239=2.145GHz) | Corsairs 512MB RAM 3-3-3-8 Dual Channel Albatron 6600GT 128MB PCI-E | Albatron KXT890 ProII | WD SATA 120GB | SONY DVDRW DW-Q30A
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 (permalink) | |
|
PCSX2 Coder
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Plymouth, UK
Posts: 9,819
|
Quote:
agree'd, PCSX2 is geared for all processors, it sucked on P4's and ruled on AMD's, but just like everything, the core2 came along and crushed everything out there. but i wouldnt say SuperPI was bias'd to intel, considering a P4 did 1M in 45 seconds, where my AMD at the same speed did it in 32 ;p all i can say is your friends are either retards, or complete AMD fanboys looking for an excuse.
__________________
http://www.generalemu.net/ Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 @ 3.4Ghz (425x8), Leadtek GTX 280 1Gb, 1.8Tb HDs, 2Gb Corsair DDR2-800 @ DDR2-1020 5-5-5-18 Dual Channel Dont PM me for help, use the forums, thats what its for! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 (permalink) |
|
Hyperion Pilgrim
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Hyperion
Posts: 2,206
|
Thanks for the suggestions.
Yes they are AMD fanboys. They think that with an Atlhon x2 4200+, they can get near my core duo at 3.06ghz.
__________________
![]() --PSP 4.01 M33 2-- ...Mis sueños son mentiras que algun día dejarán de serlo...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 (permalink) |
|
It's a Spinning Smile!
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 5,220
|
Not a hope in hell, lol
PCSX2 proves this time and time again, yet alone games like Oblivion etc. I love AMD, but you've got to admit they've not only f**ked up with their GPU, they're being slaughtered in the CPU market atm...oh well I'm sure AMD can come back with something.
__________________
![]() » Beta Tester for PCSX2 | ZeroGS KOSMOS | Satourne | nullDC | Dolphin | Misc Projects « » AMD64 X2 4400+ 939 1MB L2 @ 2.20GHz | GeForce 8800 GTX 768: 575/1800 | 2GB OCZ DC RAM @ 2-3-2-5 | 768GiB HDD « |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 (permalink) |
|
Ramma Gay
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Somwhere out in space? The Land of the Free? Heaven or Hell?
Posts: 11,673
|
AMD is usually later then Intel, and then pwnz it a bit again, it's been like that in the past, and hopefully will be like that again in the near future, same for ATi.
ATi's 9x00 series had a significant advantage over nVidia in several departments. The 1xk series arrived later than the 7x series, but imho they pwnd nVidia by offering way better image quality and more features ![]() AMD had intel by the balls with the Athlon XP and Athlon 64, and the later Athlon X2. The only part where Intel shone during those days was marketing really.
__________________
![]() PC Specs: CPU: Intel E4400 @ 2.66GHz GPU: ATi HD4870 / 512MB / Core: 775 / Mem: 1025 Mobo: Gigabyte EP35-DS3 (rev 2.1) SPU: Creative X-Fi Xtreme Music RAM: 2GB Corsair XMS2 DDR800 @ 4-4-4-12 ~ 800MHz HDD: 320GB Western Digital 16MB Caviar SE PSU: Hiper Type-R 580W Geometry Wars: 198.400 Lumines: 523.879 Rip: Cid's Bleemcast 28-08-2007 ![]() X360/Wii/PS3 belong to the current generation, update your mindset FFS |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|