Emuforums.com

Go Back   Emuforums.com > General Discussion > Software Discussion
About Us Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

Login to remove all ads!
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old November 21st, 2003   #1 (permalink)
Advent yourself
 
Titus03's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: ? (In PAL-area)
Posts: 693
Red Hat Linux 6.0

Is it possible to install Red Hat Linux 6.0 to FAT32 HD?
__________________

- SYSTEM SPECIFICATIONS: ----------------------------------
Intel Core2 Duo E8400 @3.00GHz || ASUS Commando
4GB DDR2 800MHz RAM ||
EVGA GeForce 8800 GTS 512Mb
Corsair 620W 620HX || 3x Seagate 160Gb SATAII HDD
Creative Sound Blaster X-Fi XtremeMusic
Windows XP Professional SP3/Ubuntu 8.04 Hardy Heron
------------------------------------------------------------------
Titus03 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old November 21st, 2003   #2 (permalink)
I want you INSIDE me
 
Kirby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Massachusetts, USA
Posts: 8,382
Re: Red Hat Linux 6.0

Kinda behind on the times here, I have RedHat ISOs that are at 9.0, please tell me that was a typo

I'm getting alot of seach results from something named "vfat". I'm more of a mandrake user, so I can't tell you what it means

edit> OK found something on it> http://bmrc.berkeley.edu/people/chaffee/vfat.html
__________________

Kirby's AnimeDB list
AMD Athlon64 X2 4400+ Toledo, Nvidia GeForce 7950GT SLi, 2GB PC3200 2-3-2-5, ABit AN8-SLi, Sound Blaster X-FI XtremeMusic
Kirby is offline   Reply With Quote
Old November 21st, 2003   #3 (permalink)
/dev/user
 
Ipswitch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Internet
Posts: 407
Re: Red Hat Linux 6.0

vfat is just the kernel driver that lets you read FAT partitions. im not sure if you can install to one, i think you are able to, but there has to be ext2 somewhere, maybe in the boot partition or something. im not that sure.
Ipswitch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old November 22nd, 2003   #4 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Gaenya's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Colombia, Medellin
Posts: 102
Re: Red Hat Linux 6.0

I dont know if this is what youre looking fot but
http://www.redhat.com/docs/manuals/l...tallation.html
Gaenya is offline   Reply With Quote
Old November 22nd, 2003   #5 (permalink)
Banned
 
Andrew Hruska's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: somewhere
Posts: 1,121
Re: Red Hat Linux 6.0

You can do this since 7.1, but in 8.0 and up ( 8.0, 9.0, Fedora Core 1 ) it is almost impossible to run from it.
Andrew Hruska is offline   Reply With Quote
Old November 24th, 2003   #6 (permalink)
I want you INSIDE me
 
Kirby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Massachusetts, USA
Posts: 8,382
Re: Red Hat Linux 6.0

here's something else I found. It's not RedHat, but it is a Slackware distro that can run on top of Windows

http://topologi-linux.sourceforge.net/index.php
__________________

Kirby's AnimeDB list
AMD Athlon64 X2 4400+ Toledo, Nvidia GeForce 7950GT SLi, 2GB PC3200 2-3-2-5, ABit AN8-SLi, Sound Blaster X-FI XtremeMusic
Kirby is offline   Reply With Quote
Old November 27th, 2003   #7 (permalink)
Emu author
 
ammoQ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Vienna/Austria/Europe
Posts: 1,168
Re: Red Hat Linux 6.0

Most linux distros can shrink FAT32 partitions to free some space for regular Linux partitions (ext2, ext3, reiser etc.) Some current Linux distros (Mandrake 9.1, 9.2, SuSE 9) can even shrink NTFS partitions. Installing Linux on FAT32 may be possible but I think it's a bad idea.
__________________
If you think my English is bad, wait till you read my Polish.
ammoQ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old November 27th, 2003   #8 (permalink)
Ramsus K
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 461
Re: Red Hat Linux 6.0

There's usually a big performance cost when you install Linux on a FAT32 partition. Besides that, Linux will just be installed on a disk image that will be located on the FAT32 partition. You won't save any space (since the image will be a fixed size), you won't be able to access files on the image, and you'll lose performance when running Linux.

The fixed-size problem is very big these days, because a full Linux installation can easily eat up a few GB. Because of this, you'll have a 2-3 GB file sitting on your HD using up space, even if Linux might only be using up half of it.

The only real advantage is that you don't have to repartition your hard drive. But that's not nearly as difficult as it once was.
RamsusX is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT. The time now is 04:53.

© 2006 - 2008 Emu Forums | About Emu Forums | Legal | A member of the Crowdgather Forum Community


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0 Release Candidate 3
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC5