Emuforums.com

Go Back   Emuforums.com > General Discussion > Software Discussion
Home Register Downloads FAQ Members List Calendar Arcade Mark Forums Read


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old July 19th, 2008   #1 (permalink)
Die anime!! Die!!
 
gamefreak94's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: پاكستان <--- Urdu
Posts: 6,255
Vista: good or bad?

Just wondering whether I should install Vista on my PC. Specifications and hardware shouldn't be a problem but many people still say that I'll get far better performance if I stick to Windows XP and that Vista has security and stability issues. In the face of all this criticism, is there any upside to installing Vista? Is DirectX 10 available for XP?
gamefreak94 is offline   Reply With Quote

Advertisement [Remove Advertisement]
Old July 20th, 2008   #2 (permalink)
Behind ur girlfriend :D
 
Squall-Leonhart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 18,815
Vista is harder on system memory then XP, so if your ram is poor/weak/bad it will show alot more prevalent on vista.
__________________


VBA-M | Xtemu | NGOHQ | Post Impact Productions | TNHW | XBCD 0.2.6 | Satanic666's Emulator Compiles
Don't be a NOOB, READ THE NGEmu/EmuForums Rules of Conduct
Need Help with ePSXe? This is your first stop!.

If you don't post all the required information, you don't get help.
Everytime someone posts a romsite, God kills a beautiful woman.
Squall-Leonhart is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 20th, 2008   #3 (permalink)
The Tech Guy
 
Glaedrin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 60
Also, if you are completely used to where all of the administrative utilities are... you will hate it. Oh, and it has random weird stuff happen to it as well (network connection will just die for no reason, it will spin up the HDD on idle, etc.)

Not to mention the fact that 95% of all businesses have passed on Vista. (It really has to have problems if businesses are sticking up their crosses and running away)
__________________
One civilized reader is worth a thousand boneheads - Smart Set magazine, 1914

CPU: AMD 4600+ 2.41Ghz
RAM: 2Gb of Corsair DDR2 4-4-4-12 800Mhz
Graphics Card: ATI X1900XT
OS: Windows XP SP2 FTW
Glaedrin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 20th, 2008   #4 (permalink)
PJ64 Beta Tester
 
GaveUpTomorrow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Ohio, United States
Posts: 415
I've been using Vista for almost a year now and I've never had any problems. I used XP for years before buying/building a new computer that came with Vista, and I haven't minded the upgrade at all. If you have XP and are buying Vista, it may not be worth it. But if you are getting a new computer, you might as well throw Vista on it.

Yes, many of the administrative utilities and smaller things that the common user wouldn't use have been hidden or changed to some degree, but a little bit of experience and patience will get you around that.

As for security and stability, I've had no problems with that as well. My computer has never crashed, never got a BSOD, etc. With XP, I used to get random crashes from time to time, so Vista has really been a blessing in that sense.

@Glaedrin: Also, I've never heard of anyone having the network connection die for no reason or HDD spinning up for no reason. It certainly hasn't happened to me...not anymore than it would on XP anyways.

People are really too hard on Vista though...it is actually a really great OS if people would just give it a chance rather than being scared of change. Remember when XP came out and everyone was using 2000? Everyone bashed XP, saying how horrible it was and unstable...just a tweaked up GUI. With updates it became a great OS and now everyone praises it over Vista. Well I think that Vista is now at the point with updates that it easily surpasses XP and there is no reason to stick with XP if getting a new computer or just feel like an upgrade.
__________________
Desktop:| Dell Inspiron 531 | Windows Vista Basic | AMD Athlon X2 6000+ 3.1GHz | 3GB DDR2 667Mhz Ram | EVGA 8800GTS 512MB | 2x 250GB, 1x 750GB Harddrives |

Laptop: | Dell Inspiron 1525 | Windows Vista Basic | Celeron 550 2.0Ghz | 2GB DDR2 667Mhz Ram | Intel x3100 | 120GB Harddrive |
GaveUpTomorrow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 20th, 2008   #5 (permalink)
Behind ur girlfriend :D
 
Squall-Leonhart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 18,815
I'm going to buy a bomb shelter just because of this thread.... if ref sees it.......
__________________


VBA-M | Xtemu | NGOHQ | Post Impact Productions | TNHW | XBCD 0.2.6 | Satanic666's Emulator Compiles
Don't be a NOOB, READ THE NGEmu/EmuForums Rules of Conduct
Need Help with ePSXe? This is your first stop!.

If you don't post all the required information, you don't get help.
Everytime someone posts a romsite, God kills a beautiful woman.
Squall-Leonhart is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 20th, 2008   #6 (permalink)
The Tech Guy
 
Glaedrin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 60
Well me being an IT undergrad, I can reliably tell you that ID10T and IBKAC errors have skyrocketed following the introduction of Vista (or as many in the industry call it ME II)

Not only has this probably led to more palm-to-forehead moments than we were alloted for this decade, but these "few changes" in the administrative utilities are vastly understated (why do we need 3 different pages for network settings?)

Now, this doesn't mean that an IT person cannot (after many hours of learning) be somewhat proficient in this OS, but the fact is that it now takes more than twice as many clicks to fix normal problems (more difficult problems are another story)

And the only way I would "upgrade" is if I get Server 2008, as it dumps all of the half-assed "features" for a no frills processing power-house.
__________________
One civilized reader is worth a thousand boneheads - Smart Set magazine, 1914

CPU: AMD 4600+ 2.41Ghz
RAM: 2Gb of Corsair DDR2 4-4-4-12 800Mhz
Graphics Card: ATI X1900XT
OS: Windows XP SP2 FTW
Glaedrin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 20th, 2008   #7 (permalink)
 
Spyhop's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 3,798
Quote:
Originally Posted by Squall-Leonhart View Post
Vista is harder on system memory then XP, so if your ram is poor/weak/bad it will show alot more prevalent on vista.
Statement not fair. All OS's require more memory than the versions that precede them. Leopard is a mem hungry bastard too.

Since SP1 Vista has been fine. Just turn off UAC and Search Indexing.
__________________
WINTERFELL - C2D E8400 - DFI Lanparty JR P45-T2RS MATX Motherboard - Mushkin Redline PC2 8000 DDr2 - EVGA Geforce GTX 285 - Silverstone SG01 case
RIVERRUN - Pentium DC 2.5ghz - 4GB OCZ DDR2 - Cheapie ASUS Motherboard w/onboard vid - Antec Sonata III
KING'S LANDING - 80GB Playstation 3
Spyhop is online now   Reply With Quote
Old July 20th, 2008   #8 (permalink)
Behind ur girlfriend :D
 
Squall-Leonhart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 18,815
You read the sentence wrong, i said HARDER ON MEMORY, not that it requires more.

Vista is more likely to crash because ram is out of spec (timing / voltage) then XP or any previous version of windows.

Quote:
Well me being an IT undergrad, I can reliably tell you that ID10T and IBKAC errors have skyrocketed following the introduction of Vista (or as many in the industry call it ME II)

Not only has this probably led to more palm-to-forehead moments than we were alloted for this decade, but these "few changes" in the administrative utilities are vastly understated (why do we need 3 different pages for network settings?)

Now, this doesn't mean that an IT person cannot (after many hours of learning) be somewhat proficient in this OS, but the fact is that it now takes more than twice as many clicks to fix normal problems (more difficult problems are another story)

And the only way I would "upgrade" is if I get Server 2008, as it dumps all of the half-assed "features" for a no frills processing power-house.
I'm still waiting for an nvidia installer that works properly on X64, time and time again, it fails to register the 32bit portions of the driver.
__________________


VBA-M | Xtemu | NGOHQ | Post Impact Productions | TNHW | XBCD 0.2.6 | Satanic666's Emulator Compiles
Don't be a NOOB, READ THE NGEmu/EmuForums Rules of Conduct
Need Help with ePSXe? This is your first stop!.

If you don't post all the required information, you don't get help.
Everytime someone posts a romsite, God kills a beautiful woman.
Squall-Leonhart is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 20th, 2008   #9 (permalink)
The Tech Guy
 
Glaedrin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 60
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spyhop View Post
Statement not fair. All OS's require more memory than the versions that precede them. Leopard is a mem hungry bastard too.

Well you are wrong there...

Many Linux distributions do not use much more RAM than their previous iterations, this is because of their ingenious Kernel and very good memory management (hence kickass server OS)

Don't believe me? Take a look at their min specs (read'em-n-weep)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Squall-Leonhart View Post
I'm still waiting for an nvidia installer that works properly on X64, time and time again, it fails to register the 32bit portions of the driver.
Usually it's up to both companies to work together on this (Microsoft sure did help NVIDIA with their ME II drivers), could be that NVIDIA and Microsoft are focusing more on ME II as it is being forced into nearly every new PC in the market. Aren't near monopoly's great?
__________________
One civilized reader is worth a thousand boneheads - Smart Set magazine, 1914

CPU: AMD 4600+ 2.41Ghz
RAM: 2Gb of Corsair DDR2 4-4-4-12 800Mhz
Graphics Card: ATI X1900XT
OS: Windows XP SP2 FTW

Last edited by Glaedrin; July 20th, 2008 at 07:05..
Glaedrin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 20th, 2008   #10 (permalink)
 
Spyhop's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 3,798
Quote:
Originally Posted by Glaedrin View Post
Well you are wrong there...

Many Linux distributions do not use much more RAM than their previous iterations, this is because of their ingenious Kernel and very good memory management (hence kickass server OS)
Linux is a different beast. With the exception of Ubuntu and a few others, most linux distros aren't meant for the desktop market. I was referring to the desktop OSs.......upgrades of which usually include more features and more eye candy.
__________________
WINTERFELL - C2D E8400 - DFI Lanparty JR P45-T2RS MATX Motherboard - Mushkin Redline PC2 8000 DDr2 - EVGA Geforce GTX 285 - Silverstone SG01 case
RIVERRUN - Pentium DC 2.5ghz - 4GB OCZ DDR2 - Cheapie ASUS Motherboard w/onboard vid - Antec Sonata III
KING'S LANDING - 80GB Playstation 3
Spyhop is online now   Reply With Quote
Old July 20th, 2008   #11 (permalink)
The Tech Guy
 
Glaedrin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 60
Um are you calling the effects that Linux does have not eye-candy? Just because it can render them more efficiently on OpenGL than Windows can with DX 10 dose not mean they aren't there...?

Before you go on with your ignorance on this subject try reading this very well written article and watch the vid, it will probably blow your mind.

A Better Introduction to Linux User Interface | LinuxHaxor.net
__________________
One civilized reader is worth a thousand boneheads - Smart Set magazine, 1914

CPU: AMD 4600+ 2.41Ghz
RAM: 2Gb of Corsair DDR2 4-4-4-12 800Mhz
Graphics Card: ATI X1900XT
OS: Windows XP SP2 FTW
Glaedrin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 20th, 2008   #12 (permalink)
Behind ur girlfriend :D
 
Squall-Leonhart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 18,815
err just to point out, Aero(Glass) is Dx9. Which is partially why it runs like crap.
__________________


VBA-M | Xtemu | NGOHQ | Post Impact Productions | TNHW | XBCD 0.2.6 | Satanic666's Emulator Compiles
Don't be a NOOB, READ THE NGEmu/EmuForums Rules of Conduct
Need Help with ePSXe? This is your first stop!.

If you don't post all the required information, you don't get help.
Everytime someone posts a romsite, God kills a beautiful woman.
Squall-Leonhart is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 20th, 2008   #13 (permalink)
The Tech Guy
 
Glaedrin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 60
Actually, to make it more specific, it is Direct X 9.1
__________________
One civilized reader is worth a thousand boneheads - Smart Set magazine, 1914

CPU: AMD 4600+ 2.41Ghz
RAM: 2Gb of Corsair DDR2 4-4-4-12 800Mhz
Graphics Card: ATI X1900XT
OS: Windows XP SP2 FTW
Glaedrin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 20th, 2008   #14 (permalink)
Behind ur girlfriend :D
 
Squall-Leonhart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 18,815
there is no Dx9.1 specification, you refer to Dx9L which also goes by Dx9-Ex
__________________


VBA-M | Xtemu | NGOHQ | Post Impact Productions | TNHW | XBCD 0.2.6 | Satanic666's Emulator Compiles
Don't be a NOOB, READ THE NGEmu/EmuForums Rules of Conduct
Need Help with ePSXe? This is your first stop!.

If you don't post all the required information, you don't get help.
Everytime someone posts a romsite, God kills a beautiful woman.
Squall-Leonhart is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 20th, 2008   #15 (permalink)
Die anime!! Die!!
 
gamefreak94's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: پاكستان <--- Urdu
Posts: 6,255
By the way, is there a DirectX 10 version available for Windows XP, I've heard of some Alky's version of DirectX 10 that supposedly works on XP but all download links to it that I could find were dead. Is it true that DirectX 10 significantly improves graphics rendering?
gamefreak94 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 20th, 2008   #16 (permalink)
Bruce Willis as Ichigo...
 
strike105x's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: ...means Bleach ends after episode 1
Posts: 3,557
Vista can run pretty decent with the right resources like a dual core cpu and arround 2 GB RAM and at least an 8 MB cache HDD recomended will be a 16 MB cahce thow, but the compatibillty with emulation isnt that great as with XP (i'm suprised nobody said anything about this after all this is a emulation site ) ) So with vista its all about computer specs and what you will be using it for. As for DirectX 10 it all depends on the game, but in theory yes directX 10 is a big improvement when it comes to graphics and no there is no DirectX 10 for XP yet apart from some beta DLL's moded by some guy i forgot he's name

AND NOW ABOUT LINUX: ALL linux distros are meant for Desktops its just that you have alot of work to do on them alot of configuring but there alot more cooler with the eye candy than any version of Windows. I tried linux a few times and from my personal experience i can say it rulles when it comes to eye candy
strike105x is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 20th, 2008   #17 (permalink)
The one and only
 
makotech222's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Chicago Illinois
Posts: 2,179
all emus work fine for me..

vista 64 has been pretty good for me. only a few problems here and there. like today, i installed a game that uses starforce (yeah my mistake) and it restarted my computer and wouldnt allow windows to boot. took an hour to get my computer up and running so i uninstalled starforce with the tool and just cracked the game :P

also, some mmorpgs use xtrapper for hacker protection, which is incompatible with x64, so i cant play those games but thats pretty much it for vista.
__________________


Custom Built Desktop: [Windows 7 build 7600 x64][Intel E8400@3.8ghz] [DDR2 4gb] [Nvidia EVGA Gtx 260(711/1533/2432)] [Creative Soundblaster] [Corsair 550w]
Lenovo X200Tablet: [Windows 7 build 7600 x86][L9400 @1.86ghz][Intel GMA 4500MHD][2gb Ram][160GB 7200rpm][LED-lit Touchscreen/pen-abled]

Quote:
There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order.
makotech222 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 20th, 2008   #18 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Lost.
Posts: 1,767
Quote:
By the way, is there a DirectX 10 version available for Windows XP, I've heard of some Alky's version of DirectX 10 that supposedly works on XP but all download links to it that I could find were dead. Is it true that DirectX 10 significantly improves graphics rendering?
No.

There is no DX10 for XP.

And yes, in theory, DX10 offers some benefits for developers. However, OpenGL can do pretty much the same thing and offers geometry shaders under XP.
mudlord is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 20th, 2008   #19 (permalink)
Behind ur girlfriend :D
 
Squall-Leonhart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 18,815
its all aload of bs if you ask me, XP can run Dx10, and theres no reason it would need a massive change to the os, just backport Dx10 to XP, we don't need the memory virtualisation or any of the TDR Bs, just the effects...

i still can't believe people buy MS's bs so easily.
__________________


VBA-M | Xtemu | NGOHQ | Post Impact Productions | TNHW | XBCD 0.2.6 | Satanic666's Emulator Compiles
Don't be a NOOB, READ THE NGEmu/EmuForums Rules of Conduct
Need Help with ePSXe? This is your first stop!.

If you don't post all the required information, you don't get help.
Everytime someone posts a romsite, God kills a beautiful woman.
Squall-Leonhart is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 20th, 2008   #20 (permalink)
Die anime!! Die!!
 
gamefreak94's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: پاكستان <--- Urdu
Posts: 6,255
Ubuntu is a great OS. Can I have it alongside XP or will it reset the Master Boot Record (MBR) in its own way
gamefreak94 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT. The time now is 23:51.

© 2006 - 2008 Emu Forums | About Emu Forums | Legal | A member of the Crowdgather Forum Community


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC5