|
|
|||||||
| Home | Register | Downloads | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Arcade | Mark Forums Read |
» Less advertising throughout
» Post and participate in discussions
» Network with other forum members
» Free private messaging
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Mhm.
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Mass.
Posts: 2,131
|
Anyone hear of the new 2g GPU that came out?
Saw it browsing through sites, i forget the name but it had Fire in the name. VERY expensive....
__________________
|
|
|
|
| Advertisement | [Remove Advertisement] | ||
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Mhm.
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Mass.
Posts: 2,131
|
Yeah, but wouldnt 2gbs be goodf for gaming? or the speeds are slower for clock speeds and stuff.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Your resident reaper...
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Canada
Posts: 6,031
|
Not really, they're designed to render stuff for people in the graphics field (and some others). They might sound great, but they can't compete with GPUs designed for gamers. P.S. Your 40GB hard drive showing only 31GB is completely normal .
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Moving into the beat
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: May 2004
Location: Perpetual Hawaii
Posts: 11,298
|
No current or soon-future game nees that much vram for textures. A better performance in fillrate, clockratem, bandwidth and shader support would be more important for gaming. Ultimatly, shader performance is just widening the gap too. A geforce 6 with 2gigs would never hope to match higher clocked gpus even with significantly less vram. 2 gigs would be excellent for movie fx rendering farms, btw. Those need auite as much vram as possiblem justifying the steep prices for these. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|