Emuforums.com

Go Back   Emuforums.com > General Discussion > Hardware Discussion
Home Register Downloads FAQ Members List Calendar Arcade Mark Forums Read

WON'T YOU JOIN US?
You are not a registered member and
are viewing this site as a guest.
Registration is simple and FREE.
Join this CrowdGather community today.
Registration offers the following perks:

» Less advertising throughout
» Post and participate in discussions
» Network with other forum members
» Free private messaging

join

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old August 20th, 2005, 16:49   #1
Afrodziac
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 146
upgrading my system what CPU to get?

Can you help me select a CPU? my budget is $400 I cant decide if I want to go intel or AMD 64. the amd's overall performance is better than the intel p4's but intels handle sse2 instructions better I dont plan to overclock.
Afrodziac is offline   Reply With Quote

Advertisement [Remove Advertisement]
Old August 20th, 2005, 16:54   #2
ChaosCode
disassembler
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Somewere
Posts: 1,056
this is an indirect way of asking for specs of pcsx2. read the rules.
__________________
CPU: Intel Core2Duo E8500
VIDEO: GeForce 8800GT
RAM: 2 gigs DDR2 800
Onboard Sound
HHD: 4 of verious sizes

**Dolphin's webmaster and admin http://www.dolphin-emu.com/ For latest news**
ChaosCode is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 20th, 2005, 17:11   #3
Afrodziac
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 146
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChaosCode
this is an indirect way of asking for specs of pcsx2. read the rules.

Get over yourself!! the faq's cleary state that its not known at this time what is recommended to run the emulator. and has been said many times that no consumer available parts will make it run properly. I know this, I am asking for cpu suggestions because I want to get the most for my money. PCSX2 is not the only 32-bit emulator and application I use that benefits from SSE2
Afrodziac is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 20th, 2005, 17:45   #4
General Plot
Britchie Crazy
 
General Plot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Plymouth, England
Posts: 4,952
Quote:
Originally Posted by Afrodziac
Get over yourself!! the faq's cleary state that its not known at this time what is recommended to run the emulator. and has been said many times that no consumer available parts will make it run properly. I know this, I am asking for cpu suggestions because I want to get the most for my money. PCSX2 is not the only 32-bit emulator and application I use that benefits from SSE2
Then why didn't you ask this question in the hardware forum instead of in PCSX2?
Attached Images
File Type: jpg bullshytpost.jpg (15.7 KB, 51 views)
__________________

Intel Core i7 920 @ 3.4 Ghz | 6 GB DDR3 RAM in Triple Channel | GeForce GTX 285
2.5 TB Hard Drive Space | Windows 7 Ultimate x64

Official betatester of PCSX2
General Plot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 20th, 2005, 17:56   #5
cooliscool
Global Moderator
 
cooliscool's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: SC, USA
Posts: 7,231
For $400, you can get a PS2 and quite a few games.

Moved to hardware.
__________________
cooliscool is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 20th, 2005, 17:56   #6
Afrodziac
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 146
Quote:
Originally Posted by generalplot
Then why didn't you ask this question in the hardware forum instead of in PCSX2?

This is the forum I mostly Visit I didnt even realise that there was a hardware section, mods please move thread before generalplot gets more sand in his vagina.
Afrodziac is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 21st, 2005, 03:50   #7
RF
Canadian Spaceman
 
RF's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Canada
Posts: 8,767
generalplot: please dont start flaming.

Afrodziac: you could of paid more attention to where you were posting this. Anyone who follows the PCSX2 forum is harsh, because we do get alot of idiots in there.

(btw nice touch with the sand in the vagina. <3 southpark)

Lets get this back on track please.
__________________
CPU: Core i7 920 \ MB: EVGA X58 \ RAM: 12GB OCZ DDR3-1600 \ GPU: ATi 5870

HDD: 2x 150GB VelociRaptor R0 / PSU: Enermax Galaxy 850w / OS: Windows 7 x64
RF is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 21st, 2005, 04:13   #8
Foxfyre
Emulation Junkie
 
Foxfyre's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 827
All AMD 64's support SSE2, and SSE3 I believe....and I would go with AMD over Intel anyday.
__________________
Main Rig: Intel Core 2 Duo E8400 Wolfdale (4.0ghz at 445FSB)/ GIGABYTE GA-EP45-UD3P P45 Mobo/ 4 GB G Skill PC2 8500 Ram / SAMSUNG 22X SATA DVD Burner / 500 Gig Seagate HD / 250 Gig Maxtor HD / 1TB Western Digital HD / ATI Radeon HD5750 / Realtek HD Audio

Media Center PC: AMD Athlon 64 X2 4200+ Manchester/ 2 GB Corsair PC3200 Ram / Sony Optiarc DVD-RW / 200 Gig Samsung HD / ATI Radeon HD 4650
Foxfyre is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 21st, 2005, 09:39   #9
dukenukem
Registered User
 
dukenukem's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: tucson
Posts: 1,870
I would say gor for either venice or sandiego athlon64 cpu and make sure you have the aprropriate socket939 mobo to go with it.
__________________

1st pc=pentiumd 820 dualcore,250gb sata hdd,intel gma 950,19 inch lcd,lexmark printer,8in1 media card reader.
laptop=hp pavilion dv51099nr
core2 duot 5800,500gb wd 5400rpm hdd,512mb nvidia9600gt mobile gfxcard,15.4 inch 1280x800 screen,8x dvd burner.
2nd pc
am3 phenomIIx4955be(3.8ghz),3gigs of ddr3,500gb samsung spinpoint7200rpm hdd,16x hp dvd burner,zotac eco 9800gt,asrock 870extreme3 mobo,cooler master hyper 212+ cpu cooler.
dukenukem is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 21st, 2005, 10:25   #10
Player-X
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: From Kuching in Malaysia now stuck in Houston Texas
Posts: 9,111
Unless you are into office software go for the A64
Player-X is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 21st, 2005, 11:24   #11
Dogmaan
Terminal Dogma
 
Dogmaan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 256
Intel=slightly more stable not as fast AMD=not quite as stable but quite a bit faster.
__________________
Hmm pc = ASrock 939 dual sata 2 mobo , Athlon 3700+ 2.2@2.4, 1024mb Corsair DDR nvidia geforce 7800GTX 256mb
Dogmaan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 21st, 2005, 11:33   #12
Player-X
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: From Kuching in Malaysia now stuck in Houston Texas
Posts: 9,111
Quote:
Intel=slightly more stable not as fast AMD=not quite as stable but quite a bit faster.
Myth: AMD is less stable than Intel
Fact: They are both equally stable
Myth: AMDs are less reliable
Fact: AMD is just as good as intel

Right now AMD is faster for gaming but slower for processing videos or encoding MP3s in terms of heat and power consumption AMD is better than Intel
Player-X is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 21st, 2005, 22:29   #13
Afrodziac
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 146
Quote:
Originally Posted by Player-X
Myth: AMD is less stable than Intel
Fact: They are both equally stable
Myth: AMDs are less reliable
Fact: AMD is just as good as intel

Right now AMD is faster for gaming but slower for processing videos or encoding MP3s in terms of heat and power consumption AMD is better than Intel

Ok I am leaning towards 64
Afrodziac is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 22nd, 2005, 02:31   #14
Sampah
The Handsome Man
 
Sampah's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Unlucky Place
Posts: 885
Quote:
Originally Posted by Player-X
Myth: AMD is less stable than Intel
Fact: They are both equally stable
Myth: AMDs are less reliable
Fact: AMD is just as good as intel

Right now AMD is faster for gaming but slower for processing videos or encoding MP3s in terms of heat and power consumption AMD is better than Intel
I agree, if u are using your PC to do some video or mp3s encoding, go for Intel, but for gaming, don't expect Intel run xtreme fast on 3D.

another myth: AMD is hot like hell.
The fact is: Pentium 4 3.06 ~50C AMD 64 3000+ ~45C, who's getting hot anyway?
__________________
PROCESSOR: AMD Athlon 64 3000+ @1.8Ghz RAM: Kingstone 512MB PC3200 MOBO: ECS Nforce4 A939
VGA: Pixelview Geforce 6600GT (Golden Limited Edition) 128MB OS: WinXP pro Service pack 2
Sampah is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 22nd, 2005, 03:37   #15
Dogmaan
Terminal Dogma
 
Dogmaan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 256
fact: Intels are more stable, I would not put an AMD in a server and most computers and servers i have problems with are AMD but AMD is still stable enough for home computing, just dont leave it on for months at a time, I am not biased because i work with a lot of different computers and most stability problems are stemmed from rubbish motherboards anyway, I also think AMD's duel cores are far superior to intels.
__________________
Hmm pc = ASrock 939 dual sata 2 mobo , Athlon 3700+ 2.2@2.4, 1024mb Corsair DDR nvidia geforce 7800GTX 256mb
Dogmaan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 22nd, 2005, 03:41   #16
-Superdude688-
Lazy Ass
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Wethersfield CT USA
Posts: 57
yep amd's can handle more heat. well the 64 ones anyways >> the xp's arent as good. im loving my socket 754 AMD Athlon 3000+ i was able to overclock it from 2000ghz to 2400ghz on only stock air cooling ...... not that u care cause u arent oc'ing but oh well.
__________________
"Without electricity, we would all be watching television by candlelight"
- George Global (hope i spelled that right)
-Superdude688- is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 22nd, 2005, 04:30   #17
Player-X
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: From Kuching in Malaysia now stuck in Houston Texas
Posts: 9,111
Quote:
fact: Intels are more stable, I would not put an AMD in a server and most computers and servers i have problems with are AMD but AMD is still stable enough for home computing, just dont leave it on for months at a time, I am not biased because i work with a lot of different computers and most stability problems are stemmed from rubbish motherboards anyway, I also think AMD's duel cores are far superior to intels.
Myth: AMD Athlon line processors are for servers
Fact: AMD Opterons are server processors
Fact: That is only true if you are talking about the old polamino and thunderbird cores
Fact: My Barton 2600+ hasn't been shut down since march 2005
Fact: You are not bias if you are not human
Fact: Intel also has bad moherboards
Quote:
yep amd's can handle more heat. well the 64 ones anyways >> the xp's arent as good. im loving my socket 754 AMD Athlon 3000+ i was able to overclock it from 2000ghz to 2400ghz on only stock air cooling ...... not that u care cause u arent oc'ing but oh well.
you shoud have gotten the socket 939 Mobos the 754 Mobos are only short term low-mid end sockets
Player-X is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 22nd, 2005, 05:08   #18
Dogmaan
Terminal Dogma
 
Dogmaan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 256
Quote:
Myth: AMD Athlon line processors are for servers
Fact: AMD Opterons are server processors
Fact: That is only true if you are talking about the old polamino and thunderbird cores
Fact: My Barton 2600+ hasn't been shut down since march 2005
Fact: You are not bias if you are not human
Fact: Intel also has bad moherboards
I was referring to the standard desktop cpu's not the high end server ones your standard pentium is more stable.

I never singled out AMD as having bad motherboards,i only use nforce gigabyte and intel mobos, if you use via or pc chips (£10 mobo WTF!?) then prepare for BSOD attack.
__________________
Hmm pc = ASrock 939 dual sata 2 mobo , Athlon 3700+ 2.2@2.4, 1024mb Corsair DDR nvidia geforce 7800GTX 256mb
Dogmaan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 22nd, 2005, 08:16   #19
Player-X
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: From Kuching in Malaysia now stuck in Houston Texas
Posts: 9,111
Excuse me but you my friend has the worst case of ad bias I have ever seen.
Quote:
I was referring to the standard desktop cpu's not the high end server ones your standard pentium is more stable.
As I am saying I have my main AMD CPU PC running for months now without a restart with no problems.
Quote:
if you use via or pc chips (£10 mobo WTF!?) then prepare for BSOD attack.
My secondary PC has a MSI VIA KT400 chipset and no BSODs so since it was built
Player-X is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 22nd, 2005, 16:51   #20
Viper_Viper
Experenced But New User
 
Viper_Viper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: United States of America
Posts: 866
Player-X, you are so totally right with you myth/fact statements.

Afrodziac, I know the perfect processor you could get! Athlon 64 X2 Manchester 3800+ processor! Look here for the great review of its price verses its power. And starting at $354, its right in your price range.

Edit: Here is some of the more important quotes that might help you make a dicision if your not going to read the review.
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Tech Report
The gaming performance of the X2 3800+ isn't stellar compared to higher-clocked Athlon 64 models, but it's still better than any Pentium D or Pentium 4 in the bunch, even the Extreme Edition 3.73GHz. The X2 3800+ surprisingly manages to best the Athlon 64 3500+ in a couple of tests, even though the X2 3800+ runs at a lower clock speed.
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Tech Report
3DMark's main test is obviously graphics-bound, since the CPU doesn't seem to matter much to the overall score. The CPU test, however, uses multiple software threads to handle vertex processing, and the dual-core processors get to strut their stuff. The X2 3800+ finishes just behind the Pentium Extreme Edition 840 and just ahead of AMD's single-core monster, the Athlon 64 FX-57.
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Tech Report
Despite its relatively low clock speed, the X2 3800+ makes a very decent media encoding processor.
__________________
MY PC!!!!
Intel 2.44 ghz // Intel Desktop Board D845PEBT2 (533MHz FSB) // 1GIG DDR PC2700 (NEW) // 120 gig Western Digital HD // 8x DVD+/-R 4x DVD+/-RW Burner (NEW) // 48x15x48 CD-RW // ATI Radeon 9800 Pro 128mb // USB 2.0 // Firewire (soon) // 6 Channel Digital Audio // Serial ATA //
3Dmark05 Demo - 2108


Last edited by Viper_Viper; August 22nd, 2005 at 16:59..
Viper_Viper is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 20:06.

© 2006 - 2012 Emu Forums | About Emu Forums | Advertisers | Investors | Legal | A member of the Crowdgather Forum Community


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.