|
|
|||||||
| Home | Register | Downloads | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Arcade | Mark Forums Read |
» Less advertising throughout
» Post and participate in discussions
» Network with other forum members
» Free private messaging
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Back from the dead
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Seymour, TN
Posts: 3,741
|
Which upgrade should I go with?
Which upgrade should I go with? Should I upgrade to an Athlon XP 2000 w/ Radeon 9000 Pro (128 meg) or Athlon XP 1700 w/ Geforce 4 Ti 4200 (128 meg)? I have just enough money to go with one or the other.
|
|
|
|
| Advertisement | [Remove Advertisement] | ||
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Resident Movie Critic
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Belfast, Northern Ireland
Posts: 9,506
|
Depends. Do you manly use the pc for?
__________________
Superior marketing of an inferior product will always win over inferior marketing of a superior product. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Back from the dead
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Seymour, TN
Posts: 3,741
|
I mostly use the computer for gaming or watching dvd's.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
邪魔ゎ指せない
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Gosport, England
Posts: 26,303
|
Well... The DVD playback and 2d quality of the Radeon is better, but it's slower in 3d performance than the Ti4200 IIRC.
__________________
![]() >Site Live< Pop over to my site for help with setting up PSX emulators. Help for the Final Fantasies and other RPGs avalaible Celes: (Desktop) Phenom II X4, 4Gb DDR2, GeForce 8800 GTS 320Mb, 32Gb OCZ Vertex SSD, 500Gb RAID HDD, Windows 7 Home Premium Erika: (MCPC) Revo3610, Windows 7 Home Premium Kimiko: (Craptop) HP Mini 210 |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I'd get the Ti 4200. Simply because for gaming its gonna be faster. Has Superior FSAA and Geforce 4 Ti's have very decent DVD playback. Not ATi standard. But its above any previous Geforce card. Then again. it depends on how the ease of upgrading is for you is. If changing a proccessor out phases you. Then get the chip first. And then worry about your graphics card later. But for pure benching. a Athlon XP 1700+ With a Geforce 4 Ti 4200 will get a higher score than an Athlon XP 2000+ with a Radeon 9000 Pro will get. |
|
|
|
#6 |
|
aka. "Kr0nic_2000"
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: If i told you then i would have to kill you...
Posts: 2,165
|
for better dvd video quality go with the radeon. for better fps in games go with the GF4 ti4200. according to pricewatch its only a 9 dollar diffrence between the 1700 and 1800 and a 17 dollar diffrence between 1700 and 1900. you DO have 9 extra dollars lying around right?
__________________
If you're lying to me, I'll kill ya. If I think you're lying to me, I'll kill ya. If you leave anything out, I'll kill ya. As a matter of fact you're gonna have to work very hard to stay alive. Do you understand? Good, cause if you don't, I'll kill ya. "trying is the first step towards failure" -Homer Simpson- check out my 3d marks http://service.madonion.com/compare?2k1=4481587 Last edited by Auri87; October 28th, 2002 at 23:03.. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Back from the dead
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Seymour, TN
Posts: 3,741
|
lol yeah.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Registered User
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Small island in Japan
Posts: 822
|
Flip a coin, its easy to decide. For me I will pick the one with the GF4 Ti 4200 simply because of the games and fast performance.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
The Upcoming Rookie
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 620
|
I'd say go for a better CPU, and worse video card. It just makes more sense.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Touka <3
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 11,868
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Either choice you make. It's easy to upgrade either later. However it is "my" opinion. That the Geforce 4 Ti 4200 and Athlon XP 1700+ will offer you the best performance for "todays" games. And your CPU will be easily upgraded later. |
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
Back from the dead
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Seymour, TN
Posts: 3,741
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
aka. "Kr0nic_2000"
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: If i told you then i would have to kill you...
Posts: 2,165
|
Quote:
__________________
If you're lying to me, I'll kill ya. If I think you're lying to me, I'll kill ya. If you leave anything out, I'll kill ya. As a matter of fact you're gonna have to work very hard to stay alive. Do you understand? Good, cause if you don't, I'll kill ya. "trying is the first step towards failure" -Homer Simpson- check out my 3d marks http://service.madonion.com/compare?2k1=4481587 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
The Upcoming Rookie
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 620
|
I would have the better CPU, and worse video card, since a you can upgrade to new video card later. Besides, with NV30 coming up, you might as well spend less on the video card, and spend more on the CPU. If you still have extra cash after you buy your parts, I recommend you buy some memory. Now that's up to you. By the way, do you have the motherboard and power supply to run a Athlon XP? |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I would say mix n' match. Go for the Athlon 2000+ and the TI 4200. I am running an Athlon XP 2000+ amd GF4 TI 4600 and it is a great combination. Especially w/Riva Tuner and the 41.03 Detonator drivers. The 2000+ is a nice fast processor and the TI 4200 has all the same features that my card does, it is just a little slower is all. But, as dogulation000 said, make sure you have a capable motherboard and power supply to run the XP. sincerely, sx/amiga |
|
|
|
#16 | |
|
The Upcoming Rookie
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 620
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Registered User
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Darkside Of Xeen
Posts: 1,125
|
Sxamiga,r u using ECS k7s5a mainboard?
__________________
*Signature filesize too large* |
|
|
|
|
|
#18 | |
|
Back from the dead
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Seymour, TN
Posts: 3,741
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|