1964 is faster than UHLE in WinXP!

**cooliscool** · September 16th, 2002, 03:36

First time tring 1964 in XP, and it is MUCH faster than in 98se, it's much faster than ultrahle now... beautiful.

mario's hand being big is cause i was punching, i know it looks like a glitch lol.

Attached Images

art.jpg (114.5 KB, 289 views)

Esturk · September 16th, 2002, 05:14

I think 1964 makes use of something that is only in xp to make it run faster. It runs better then PJ64 on my system. But maybe I'm just an idiot!

I know that probably didn't make sense but maybe someone would care to elaborate?

__________________
Necrosaro: Windows 7 Ultimate x64 Edition SP1 | Intel Core i5 2500K - 3.30GHz, 8MB L3 Cache | Asus P8P67 Deluxe, Intel P67 Chipset, Socket 1155 | 8GB Kingston PC3-10600 DDR3 | Nvidia GeForce GTX460, 1024MB | Creative SB X-Fi Fatality Edition | Western Digital Raptor WD1500HLFS, 150Gb, SATA, Western Digital WD1001FALS, 1000GB, SATA | LG 16x DVD-RWx2 SATA.

**cooliscool** · September 16th, 2002, 13:27

It's much faster than pj64 here too, it uses a really fast recompilation engine an uses some threading technology that can only really be seen on XP.

Esturk · September 16th, 2002, 13:38

That's what I was trying to remember! Threading technology.

__________________
Necrosaro: Windows 7 Ultimate x64 Edition SP1 | Intel Core i5 2500K - 3.30GHz, 8MB L3 Cache | Asus P8P67 Deluxe, Intel P67 Chipset, Socket 1155 | 8GB Kingston PC3-10600 DDR3 | Nvidia GeForce GTX460, 1024MB | Creative SB X-Fi Fatality Edition | Western Digital Raptor WD1500HLFS, 150Gb, SATA, Western Digital WD1001FALS, 1000GB, SATA | LG 16x DVD-RWx2 SATA.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

September 16th, 2002, 05:14	#2
Esturk Registered User Join Date: Sep 2001 Location: Edmonton, Alberta, Canada Posts: 6,964	I think 1964 makes use of something that is only in xp to make it run faster. It runs better then PJ64 on my system. But maybe I'm just an idiot! I know that probably didn't make sense but maybe someone would care to elaborate? __________________ Necrosaro: Windows 7 Ultimate x64 Edition SP1 \| Intel Core i5 2500K - 3.30GHz, 8MB L3 Cache \| Asus P8P67 Deluxe, Intel P67 Chipset, Socket 1155 \| 8GB Kingston PC3-10600 DDR3 \| Nvidia GeForce GTX460, 1024MB \| Creative SB X-Fi Fatality Edition \| Western Digital Raptor WD1500HLFS, 150Gb, SATA, Western Digital WD1001FALS, 1000GB, SATA \| LG 16x DVD-RWx2 SATA.

September 16th, 2002, 13:27	#3
cooliscool Global Moderator Join Date: Jul 2001 Location: SC, USA Posts: 7,231	It's much faster than pj64 here too, it uses a really fast recompilation engine an uses some threading technology that can only really be seen on XP.

September 16th, 2002, 13:38	#4
Esturk Registered User Join Date: Sep 2001 Location: Edmonton, Alberta, Canada Posts: 6,964	That's what I was trying to remember! Threading technology. __________________ Necrosaro: Windows 7 Ultimate x64 Edition SP1 \| Intel Core i5 2500K - 3.30GHz, 8MB L3 Cache \| Asus P8P67 Deluxe, Intel P67 Chipset, Socket 1155 \| 8GB Kingston PC3-10600 DDR3 \| Nvidia GeForce GTX460, 1024MB \| Creative SB X-Fi Fatality Edition \| Western Digital Raptor WD1500HLFS, 150Gb, SATA, Western Digital WD1001FALS, 1000GB, SATA \| LG 16x DVD-RWx2 SATA.