Thank you Lewpy!

Sanhime · June 9th, 2002, 02:56

FSAA BABY...SWEET!!!

Next up...time to test out the "texture-window daddy" of them all...Jumping Flash!

Sanhime · June 9th, 2002, 03:32

What game would be a good example to see a major difference betwwen PSX-controlled dithering vs. forced-dithering?

Tested out Jumping Flash. Went from 10-15 fps to 40-50 fps...SWEET.

Funny, Jumping is the only I ever seen where "FULL" offscreen is faster than "EXTRA" and "EXTRA+FB". Wierd, ain't it?

Sanhime · June 9th, 2002, 15:10

Is it me or do I just don't see any different between 32bit textures/framebuffer vs 16bit textures/framebuffer? Except maybe getting about 20 fps more when setting to 16bit.

June 9th, 2002, 02:56	#1
Sanhime Banned Join Date: Aug 2001 Location: Sacred Ground, NYC, USA Posts: 873	Thank you Lewpy! FSAA BABY...SWEET!!! Next up...time to test out the "texture-window daddy" of them all...Jumping Flash!

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

June 9th, 2002, 03:32	#2
Sanhime Banned Join Date: Aug 2001 Location: Sacred Ground, NYC, USA Posts: 873	What game would be a good example to see a major difference betwwen PSX-controlled dithering vs. forced-dithering? Tested out Jumping Flash. Went from 10-15 fps to 40-50 fps...SWEET. Funny, Jumping is the only I ever seen where "FULL" offscreen is faster than "EXTRA" and "EXTRA+FB". Wierd, ain't it?

June 9th, 2002, 15:10	#3
Sanhime Banned Join Date: Aug 2001 Location: Sacred Ground, NYC, USA Posts: 873	Is it me or do I just don't see any different between 32bit textures/framebuffer vs 16bit textures/framebuffer? Except maybe getting about 20 fps more when setting to 16bit.