The UK wants to build a 'giant database' of internet usage

[GeominorAI]

The UK wants to build a 'giant database' of internet usage

The UK is working to pass a new bill that would require ISPs to store all internet data for 12 months, with metadata open for warrantless examination by everyone from law enforcement to tax inspectors

The UK is still working on beefing up its internet surveillance systems, as part of a project that activists say amounts to data mining on an absolutely massive scale. The British government says that the system store internet communications on multiple, privately held databases for at least a year, keeping them available for targeted tracking of criminals.

The bill is essentially a revision of a plan that was scrapped by the Labour government back in 2009 because of complaints from Conservatives and Liberal Democrats, which would have created a single, government controlled database of all internet traffic in the UK. The new plan is currently being examined by a joint committee of MPs and peers. It would allow officials to view metadata, like the names of files that were transferred, when and to whom messages were sent, and what websites have been accessed, without a warrant, which would be needed to actually view the content itself.

The new plan calls for a ‘request filter,' a system that would allow everyone from law enforcement to tax inspectors to dig through citizen's internet histories while conducting investigations. Obviously, there's a potential for abuse there, not only from the government, but also hackers. Considering what we know about standard corporate security practices, there's a good chance that some of these ‘private databases' will consist of plain text files.

Dr. Julian Richards, co-director of the center for security and intelligence studies at Buckingham University, says that it makes more sense to describe the ‘filter' as a search engine. “By using this filter mechanism it will look and feel the same as if there was a great big database behind the scenes that you could dip into and pull the particular information you want,” he told the BBC. He says that the current amount of difficulty involved with accomplishing that task is only benefiting terrorists and criminals.

Civil liberties and internet rights groups disagree, claiming that the new law would allow officials to build up a complex map of private communications, tying together everything from mobile phone accounts to Facebook pages. Rachel Robinson, the policy offer for the activist group Liberty, put it:

And even though the UK is the only EU country looking into such a plan, the BBC says that it is based on EU directives that could eventually spread to other countries. Already, though, it's become the envy of some countries, like Germany, which Richards say is ‘way behind' the UK in implementing similar policies. And while Germany may have trouble adopting such policies because of its history of abusive regimes, Richards says that the UK should have no such problem.

“…this is a very much more difficult issue in the Federal Republic than it is in the United Kingdom, where we look back with pride on our long history of democracy.” Arguments against such provisions in the UK stem more from what he called a “disturbing lack of trust in the institutions and people charged with looking after our security,” than anything else, and that the government needs to be able to keep pace with today's technology.

And even though it may not come easy, this law is another example of government attempting to place more regulations and oversight on the internet, something that activists worldwide have shown a great willingness to combat. We've got no doubt that this one will be any different, but it does point out another really disturbing trend: even in defeat, these laws always seem to come back from the dead. How long until they finally start slipping through?

Source: Neowin

__________________
Computational intelligence must be implemented on a parallel architecture

[Hard core Rikki]

Didnt they use to call it Facebook ?

__________________

deviantART | Blog | VBA-M | GeneralEmu | XTemu | FMVTool2 | @ES | Shendo new

NGemu toolbar http://ngemu.ourtoolbar.com

[michael86thomas]

I think the VPN business will start to do very well soon with all these new laws

[aceloop]

[thelittlegumnut]

we're gonna need a new internet soon.

the outernet...

__________________
You say I'm crazy? I say you're talking to a gumnut.

[the_randomizer]

Fake personal information is one way to do it, unless you're trying to apply for a job or something. Why do you think I made up my address and phone number on Facebook? Either that or a use a very secure VPN. Seriously, why all these government agencies are so hellbent on collecting personal information in such a manner is beyond me.

__________________
CPU - 3rd Gen Core i5 3570 3.4 GHz (3.8 GHz Turbo Boost)
Extensions - MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, EIST,
AVX, Hyper Threading, Intel VT-x, AES-NI, Turbo Boost 2.0, TXT, Smart Cache
GPU - MSI GeForce GTX 660 2 GB GDDR5
RAM - 8192MB DDR3 SDRAM 1333
OS - Windows 7 Professional 64-bit
HDD - Western Digital 1 TB

"If you call up your local hardware store and ask them how you can put tractor tires onto a 1990 Honda, well there's gonna be some laughter, a visit from the cops, maybe a psychiatric nurse." - Red Green

[thelittlegumnut]

i didn't enter in anything for FB. just my extremely basic info, like my first or last name. i don't know if it's compulsory to give other details since i signed up over a year ago.

__________________
You say I'm crazy? I say you're talking to a gumnut.

[Radix865]

Originally Posted by the_randomizer

Seriously, why all these government agencies are so hellbent on collecting personal information in such a manner is beyond me.

Because they're extremely envious of Facebook knowing more than they do about their own citizens... Seriously, it must be aboslutely enraging that some elitist nerd barely out of school knows more than they do...and makes money with it to boot!

__________________

[Ahielia]

Originally Posted by Hard core Rikki

Didnt they use to call it Facebook ?

I thought it was called "Google".