GSdx

[redlofredlof]

Originally Posted by bositman

Do not ask for PCSX2 SVN builds here,it is against the rules and is off-topic.
Compile it yourself

Sorry i did not know that.
as of now i download svn390 and it works great it has give a 10fps increase in tekken5 in-game.

---

Last edited by redlofredlof; August 22nd, 2008 at 13:27..

[Zero Lamperouge]

i don't know if this has been asked before but when i'm installing this when it asks to replace the old sss3.dll from version 0.17 it asks me for a password :x

[intellect]

Originally Posted by Zero Lamperouge

i don't know if this has been asked before but when i'm installing this when it asks to replace the old sss3.dll from version 0.17 it asks me for a password :x

lol?

man, just get gsdx from the first page...

(or grab 1.7 and 1.8 from my signature, I have modded them with a large initial screen, like gsdx 1.9 does at start)

__________________
C2D E8400 @ 3900 Mhz | GF 8800 GT | P5K-SE 1104 | 2 GB
Get GSdx 1.7 and GSdx 1.8 with larger window screen!

[Y~K]

Originally Posted by Krakatos

Please use the search function next time XD

It is known issue and it does not depend from the graphic plugin used. Turn off the lights and get past that point that way..

What do you mean by "turn off the light"?

Originally Posted by rama2

Ah yes, thanks.
The issue is indeed fixed on my build, along with all the text though

Glad to hear you fixed it. Can you upload and link to your build please?
I'd like to use it to pass the Barheim...

---

Last edited by Y~K; August 22nd, 2008 at 17:09..

[rama2]

As I said, the text is gone as well.
You'll have to wait for a pcsx2 update to adress this issue.
For now just try and pass it using interpreter, guess your way
or pass this on your ps2, k?

[Y~K]

Originally Posted by rama2

As I said, the text is gone as well.
You'll have to wait for a pcsx2 update to adress this issue.
For now just try and pass it using interpreter, guess your way
or pass this on your ps2, k?

Dude my PS2 is on its original box in my attic for at least 5 or 6 years. And there is no way I will ever pull it out again from there, it must be full of dust and spider webs.

Anyway it seems requesting builds is not allowed, so can you quickly explain the compiler needed with link please. If it requires a customized compiler please upload it.

---

Last edited by Y~K; August 22nd, 2008 at 17:47..

[NexXxus]

Originally Posted by Y~K

Dude my PS2 is on its original box in my attic for at least 5 or 6 years.

ah and you dumped the bios before you putted it into the box?

__________________

My System: C2D E6700 @3.4ghz | Asus P5W DH Deluxe | 4GB DDR2 800 | eVGA Geforce GTX 260 55nm SC-Edition
Tutorial: Hardware Antialiasing in PCSX2 (DX9 only)

[tich]

lol.... BAMMM in your face!!!
anw the build that rama2 made is private to him (along with the modified sources) and i don't think he'll just simply give it to you. So please wait for the next pcsx2 version.

__________________
PC: INTEL Pentium D 3.4 GHz , 1GB DDR2 Kingston, Geforce 7600GS 512MB PCI-X , Win XP Pro SP2
PS2: SCPH-70012 v12 USA

[redlofredlof]

the new GSdx rev849 v1.10 works okay but not much difference.

[Y~K]

after a little search it seems the windows compiler is visual studio and that mingw is not supported =/ well I give up on compiling it then

Originally Posted by tich

lol.... BAMMM in your face!!!

Like most people using PCSX2 (I'd say over 99%) I haven't dumped my BIOS image. So what? I doubt a kid like you even understand what dumping means anyway.

anw the build that rama2 made is private to him (along with the modified sources) and i don't think he'll just simply give it to you. So please wait for the next pcsx2 version.

It is a violation of term of use to make changes to an open source project and not publish the code changes.

---

Last edited by Y~K; August 22nd, 2008 at 21:25..

[taltamir]

actually it is never a violation of the terms of use to make changes to an open source project. It is a violation of the terms to distribute it as an executable without making the source code available upon request to the people you are distributing it to. And that is assuming you have an open source license that specifies that, like the GPL.

1. You can make changes to it, and keep them to yourself, and refuse to share.
2. You can sell / give copies of it, changed or not, as long as you make available the source code of what you sell to the people whom you sell it / give it to under the same original license (someone can buy it from you, and then legally put it and the source up for everyone to download for free).
etc.

But he is not violating the license if he refuses to give YOU the source code, unless he gave YOU an executable compiled from said code.

[GiGaHeRz]

Originally Posted by taltamir

It is a violation of the terms to distribute it as an executable without making the source code available upon request to the people you are distributing it to.

Actually, I think the GPL explicitly says you MUST provide all the sources, together with any changes you have made to them, when distributing your "derivative work", and not just "upon request".

__________________
"There's only one absolute truth in our world: shït happens." - Gigaherz (whoever decided "s-h-i-t" is a obscene word needs to grow up a few years)

The Book and other stories:
Tears of Fantasy - An Online Book... by ME!
MetaLife, Inc. (intro)
SubGaea (intro)
Crow Blade (intro for now)
Memories - Prayer from the fallen hearts.

My weblog... not like if there was too much to read on it tho.
For anyone interested, there's a mirc script which converts "/me 's" into " * nickname's whatever" and adds a nice "/my" command.

[rama2]

Y~K: Thanks for reminding me, but the sources are available.
I'm just happy I didnt send you the build when you asked for it.

[khestoi2]

@StriderVM
My rig is quite old. But i just bought it this year.
Pentium D 925
Geforce 7600GS AGP
1g Kingston Ram
Asus P5PE-VM Mobo
I dont have the money to buy such parts so i just sticked with it.
But now that I graduated and started working, Im planing to buy one
An E8600 or a Q6600.
Then a GTX 260.

Sory for the late reply.
I can only access this site during weekends because
this site is blocked by websense in the office.

@Gabest
What do you mean by Ar Tonelico works fine?
Are you not getting the weird screens I uploaded?

[gabest]

As you can see on my screenshot, only the background is wrong, but not the colors.

__________________


DirectX End-User Runtime Web Installer

[runawayprisoner]

Originally Posted by gabest

As you can see on my screenshot, only the background is wrong, but not the colors.

Ditto. Only the main menu (new game?) has that weird background to me. In-game is fine.

Advice to khestoi2: try using Pixel Shader 3.0? I guess DirectX 10 is out of the question for you, but... just try PS 3.0. If you are running with PS 3.0, then try PS 2.0.

__________________
cChip interpreter WIP - current status: Release Candidate
LRx Filter RC - current performance rating: 9/10

[taltamir]

Originally Posted by GiGaHeRz

Actually, I think the GPL explicitly says you MUST provide all the sources, together with any changes you have made to them, when distributing your "derivative work", and not just "upon request".

if that was the case, then you would not be able to download an exe file for a GPL program WITHOUT the source code. You would HAVE to download a zip file containing both the source and the binary.
Every single site, ever, offers both of those as separate downloads. You must make it available, but a person may opt out of receiving the source codes.

That being said,my point stands that no one is obligated to give a random stranger their code.
It has to be someone you provided a compiled program to.

If you distribute via X, you can choose to make those two seperate, as long as you offer (at no extra charge) the source code via X as well to anyone buying / receiving the compiled product from you.

---

Last edited by taltamir; August 23rd, 2008 at 07:22..

[cottonvibes]

Originally Posted by taltamir

If you distribute via X, you can choose to make those two seperate, as long as you offer (at no extra charge) the source code via X as well to anyone buying / receiving the compiled product from you.

i'm pretty sure you can't sell an open-source compiled build.

if that was the case, then someone can just take PCSX2, and change 1 part of the source-code and sell the compiled build to people, as long as they provide the source-code that they changed.

__________________

Eccentricity is often associated with genius, giftedness, or creativity. The individual's eccentric behavior is perceived to be the outward expression of his or her unique intelligence or creative impulse. In this vein, the eccentric's habits are incomprehensible not because they are illogical or the result of madness, but because they stem from a mind so original that it cannot be conformed to societal norms.

check out my blog

[hockland]

Originally Posted by Y~K

Like most people using PCSX2 (I'd say over 99%) I haven't dumped my BIOS image. So what? I doubt a kid like you even understand what dumping means anyway.

Well you see the terms of using pcsx2 is under the condition of you dumping your own bios. Now seeing as your ps2 has "been in an attic" and you've admitted to downloading yours, thats against the terms of the emulators use since thats piracy. Rules are rules I`m afraid.

__________________
Old habits die hard - System Shock

PC Specs: 2.4 ghz Quad Core, 3gb ram, nvidia 8800GTS 640mb gfx card.

[taltamir]

Originally Posted by cottonvibes

i'm pretty sure you can't sell an open-source compiled build.

if that was the case, then someone can just take PCSX2, and change 1 part of the source-code and sell the compiled build to people, as long as they provide the source-code that they changed.

which the GPL makes a SPECIFIC example to say that YOU CAN sell it... And no change is actually necessary...
OSDisc.com - Buy Linux CDs and DVDs - New releases. Low prices.

look there, or google "buy linux"... it is perfectly legal for you to sell it to people.

There is nothing stopping you from packaging PCSX2, modified or not, on a CD and selling it to someone... as long as you either include the source, or offer it on a seperate disk for free to your customers. As long as you don't claim to own it's copyright, and include the GPL license in there. Most people are not going to buy it from you when they can download it online for free. But some people refuse to connected to the internet (the government is watching), you might even include a DVD guide of dumping your own bios....

If you DO make a major modification... sooner or later someone will buy it from you, demand the source code, and post it as a patch into the PCSX2 project in here...

So really, you should be selling it for a high price.