GSdx

[korisnik2007a]

Just need to ask one thing..Which GSDX version has the post-processing enabled for Dragon Ball Z Budkai Tenkaichi 3??

@junior - Did you enable DC @ MTGS...and you have very weak graphic (it's weaker than 7300GT),did you OC the proc??

[junior600]

no,if i overclocked,the fps are good?

[cottonvibes]

your game runs slow because of your weak processor.

and this is the GSdx thread; don't talk about stuff that has nothing to do with GSdx in this thread!

__________________

Eccentricity is often associated with genius, giftedness, or creativity. The individual's eccentric behavior is perceived to be the outward expression of his or her unique intelligence or creative impulse. In this vein, the eccentric's habits are incomprehensible not because they are illogical or the result of madness, but because they stem from a mind so original that it cannot be conformed to societal norms.

check out my blog

[korisnik2007a]

Which GSDX did not disable post-processing in DBZ BT3???I would use some help...I mean in GDSX 10 versions...

[gatsu99]

exellent work !!!! super robot wars og gaiden is PER-FECT !!!!!

[retsuseiba]

perfect srw ogg

fps drop from srw alpha3 cuz animation so complex

but if no line in full texture filter ,its so great

[rene mauricio]

Originally Posted by rene mauricio

One thing I noticed about the latest GSDx plug-in is that if I change the internal resolution to 1680x1050, Final Fantasy 12 will crash during the introduction. If I leave it alone the game runs great.

Just tried 1680x1050 with Resident Evil Outbreak File #2 and it worked great. Tried Final Fantasy XII again and it crashed right when it got to the Square Enix logo. Here is the error report I got:




Problem Event Name: APPCRASH
Application Name: pcsx2svn377.exe
Application Version: 0.0.0.0
Application Timestamp: 48497d30
Fault Module Name: GSdx-ssse3.dll
Fault Module Version: 1.0.1.9
Fault Module Timestamp: 489be2e8
Exception Code: c0000005
Exception Offset: 00022f8e
OS Version: 6.0.6001.2.1.0.256.1
Locale ID: 1033
Additional Information 1: fd00
Additional Information 2: ea6f5fe8924aaa756324d57f87834160
Additional Information 3: fd00
Additional Information 4: ea6f5fe8924aaa756324d57f87834160




When I use use the previous version of GSDx it does not crash with that internal resolution. If it matters; I am using Directx 10 in hardware mode on a ATi 4850 with a e2180 @ 3.2GHz

[runawayprisoner]

0.19 broke 65fps average in GT4 for me. Nice job, Gabest!

And for those who say that HD 4800 series have issues... I confirm none.

__________________
cChip interpreter WIP - current status: Release Candidate
LRx Filter RC - current performance rating: 9/10

[PCXL-Fan]

Originally Posted by runawayprisoner

And for those who say that HD 4800 series have issues... I confirm none.

Well I don't think its a good idea to word it like that.... as thats not entirely true... even your according to your very own posts in another thread.

Its only a none issue on quadcores and likely tricores as well. Poorer than expected performance still when teaming that card up with dualcore cpus.

The problem seems likely to be the same one that was affecting HD 3000 series. HD4000 series seems to puts some of the workload on the cpu which the geforce series on the otherhand does not.

The additional core(s) beyond 2 are able to handle the additional workload placed on them by the 4xxx series, as pcsx2 taxes the initial 2 cores to the max and cannot spare any cpu cycles for any other task without a drop in pcsx2 performance.

__________________

Try @ES the ultimate emulator frontend and all in one media player

Originally Posted by Exodus

Yes, I like anime, Street Fighter, Japanese music and download video game music. Yes, I know... I've changed.

gamersat678's Bug Reporter ||| cottonvibe's pcsx2 guide for noobs ||| GSdx plugin ||| DirectX End-User Runtime Web Installer

[runawayprisoner]

True enough, but here's the issue in reality: usage about 30% on additional cores, all 4 cores running at 3.6GHz. So maybe it does stress the additional cores a bit, but with a dual-core like E8400 for instance... running at 4.2GHz or so, it should be able to saturate the difference in performance.

And I wouldn't complain about the additional workload, since it net me an additional 10fps in GT4, which seems likely a GPU-limited title. On GeForce cards, although the additional cores won't be stressed, frame rates aren't as nice.

So needless to say, this is like... PCSX2 fully utilizing a quad-core, in a way. And it suddenly makes an HD4000 series card so much more crucial for a quad-core system, if you ever want to run PCSX2 on it. And then this turns from an issue with low-end systems... to a blessing for high-end systems. Now you won't have anything to complain about when you buy a quad-core only for PCSX2.

(In case you haven't noticed, 71fps. ;p With a GeForce 9800GTX, although the workload isn't stressing the CPU, it's only getting like 61fps or so. Actually 50fps with the last SVN. And note again, upgrading from 9600GT to 9800GTX on GeForce does nothing at all)

__________________
cChip interpreter WIP - current status: Release Candidate
LRx Filter RC - current performance rating: 9/10

[Hurlinggreen]

Whenever i start 64 bit pcsx2 0.9.4 and go to config my plugins, none show up up but zeroGS in graphics even though i have gsdx1.8 in my plugins folder. also i read somewhere that there was a vm fix for vista but the link on pcsx2.net is down. anyone have it? heres my setup: Vista Ultimate x64, asus p5n32-e sli plus, q6600(G0)@3.0ghz, ati hd3850 256MB, 3GB 800MHZ ram, 400 GB sataII WD caviar

[Firnis]

Hurlinggreen
Update DirectX. Link is in the first post.

About VM fix ask in pcsx2 forum, not here.

__________________
sorry for my english.

[gabest]

Originally Posted by runawayprisoner

True enough, but here's the issue in reality: usage about 30% on additional cores

54% total, +4% only, 2%/core, but maybe that is enough to not stall it.

__________________


DirectX End-User Runtime Web Installer

[KaOSoFt]

I just wanted to report that with the latest version I am finally able to get into the BIOS without having to use ZeroGS... It looks blurry, but it works.

Thank you. Keep going.

__________________
To be human is to know the fear of death, yet keep on fighting.

Thermaltake Tsunami VA3000BWA | Seasonic M12 600W | Gigabyte GA-P35-DS3L | Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 @ 3.0GHz | G.Skill PC2-6400 2GBPK 800 MHz | 2x1 Hitachi Deskstar P7K500 500 GB | eVGA® GeForce 8800GT 512 MB | LG L1753T 17" | System picture

[tallbender]

Originally Posted by gatsu99

exellent work !!!! super robot wars og gaiden is PER-FECT !!!!!

Originally Posted by retsuseiba

perfect srw ogg

fps drop from srw alpha3 cuz animation so complex

but if no line in full texture filter ,its so great

i really glad to heard these 2 replys but i have no time to play srw ogg
too busy on alpha 3 i just wanted to finish EX-Hard mode.to unlock special mode...and then going to my next series neither MX or OGG.

__________________
My Main PC:C2D E6750@2.66 Ghz(Not overclocked),GPU:9500GT 512MB-ddr3 128bit,PhysX:Yes(P:Nov 2008),1 pair Kingston-800-1GB[Total 2GB],P35-Neo(MSI),Seagate Barracuda 160GB(SATA),Windows XP(SP2),Cheat Engine 4.2=Not installed,Purchased:Jan 2008
My Sub PC:Pentium 4@2Ghz,512 MB RAM,Geforce4 MX4000 64MB-ddr 64bit(Spare:GeforceMX2-440 64MB-ddr 64bit),Windows XP(SP3,2600 build)and Windows98SE,2 hard disks 40GB and 10GB,Purchased:Jan 2003
My PCSX2 video gallery
http://youtube.com/tallbender
Can You Run it
http://www.systemrequirementslab.com/referrer/srtest

---

Last edited by tallbender; August 11th, 2008 at 05:26.. Reason: reply fix

[runawayprisoner]

Originally Posted by gabest

54% total, +4% only, 2%/core, but maybe that is enough to not stall it.

Yeah... I thought that 5 was a 3... (need new glasses...)
Anyway, that is apparently helping a lot more than I thought it would.

1024 x 1024 internal res GT4.

__________________
cChip interpreter WIP - current status: Release Candidate
LRx Filter RC - current performance rating: 9/10

[Borisz]

Gradius 5 still has the motion blur effect bug (cutscene at the second level), its actually worse then it was in 0.1.8. There texturing bug in the ranking screen also remains, though its not as bad as it was in 0.1.8.

Neither happens in software mode, the latter does not happen in dx9 mode (in 0.1.8 - didn't test dx9 with 0.1.9).

also, still no OSD and selectable fullscreen resolution in dx10 mode =(

[eliot_cougar]

Still too slow in Final Fantasy X on level "Highroad" where there are too many polygons (appr. 18000/1500)
ZeroGS works just fine...

[hockland]

For me GT4 still crashes when you try to do a race (which wasn`t occuring 2 gsdx svn versions ago). The game runs perfect until you go to start a race. The camera does the usual switch to camera points around the vehicle and then the game crashes.

Attached Images

untitled.JPG (119.2 KB, 57 views)

__________________
Old habits die hard - System Shock

PC Specs: 2.4 ghz Quad Core, 3gb ram, nvidia 8800GTS 640mb gfx card.

[NexXxus]

try the official 384 without X3 mod..

btw: GT4 works for me, but it always freeze on most racetracks and the fps going up to 300+...
but the new york track just works fine.

__________________

My System: C2D E6700 @3.4ghz | Asus P5W DH Deluxe | 4GB DDR2 800 | eVGA Geforce GTX 260 55nm SC-Edition
Tutorial: Hardware Antialiasing in PCSX2 (DX9 only)