Emuforums.com

Go Back   Emuforums.com > PS2 Emulation > PCSX2 Forum
Home Register Downloads FAQ Members List Calendar Arcade Mark Forums Read


Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old January 25th, 2007   #41 (permalink)
Hardware Enthusiast
 
dashboardy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: blah
Posts: 808
Quote:
last 2 are the same processor, both merom core, just different socket
so you're saying that although the platform has changed generations (from Napa to santa rosa, the chips (Merom M to Merom P) are considered the same generation?? verrrry interesting...

hey looka that - got my first star!
dashboardy is offline  

Advertisement [Remove Advertisement]
Old January 25th, 2007   #42 (permalink)
The 7th Key
 
ian209's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Canada
Posts: 510
Will a quad core make any difference to my current setup?
(Intel C2D Q6600)
__________________

Asus Maximus Formula (With Rampage Bios mod)
Intel Q6600 @ 3.6Ghz (24/7)
ATI Radeon HD4870 (800/1100)
G.Skill F2-8000 8GB (2GBX4) [5-5-5-15@DDR800]
Corsair TX650 PSU
3X 320GB Seagate 7200.10 in Raid 0
2X 320GB + 500GB HDD (WD/Seagate)
TT Mozart TX
Win Vista Premium x64


Watercooling parts:

HWLabs Black Ice Extreme 240 Rad
Swiftech MCR-240 Rad
Laing D4 Pump
Swiftech Apogee GT CPU block
Switfech MCW30 GPU Block


http://www.ilike.com/artist/The7thKey - Check out my music.
ian209 is offline  
Old January 25th, 2007   #43 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Desaigy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: West Linn
Posts: 2
I am aware that this is a horrible first post:
I've been looking around and I haven't found anything mentioned about Nvida quadro fx 4000 mentioned. it seems like when I see Nvida spoken, it is with "geforce" attached to it. I just got a quadro-fx 4000 as a late christmas present and was wondering how that would fair on pcsx2.
again, I apologize for this first post.
Desaigy is offline  
Old January 25th, 2007   #44 (permalink)
 
shafeen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: india<<hyderabad..it rocks>>
Posts: 2,770
hi desaigy there would be some quadro users here u can go and search the threads for them
or you could test a game urself and post it here refraction would add it
__________________


Quote:
and if I don't care , do I still get to suck your scrotum? please say yes xp
^^posted by sonic

shafeen is offline  
Old January 25th, 2007   #45 (permalink)
大魔王
 
hajime's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Spain
Posts: 47
Hi friends.
I have been trying Virtua Fighter 4 Evolution.
I have a laptop (yes, I know laptops aren't recommended usually) which has Core Duo, and the graphic card is an Intel integrated one of 128 MB.
The good thing is that the video card seems to support many things, since I can see all polygons.
The bad thing is that it only runs at 5 fps, or 10fps at some moments.

Do you think that upgrading the video card to one of the last nVidia, for example, will improve the fps rate, or being a laptop it is probable that it doesn't get much better?

Thanks
hajime is offline  
Old January 25th, 2007   #46 (permalink)
MMP-2 Dude
 
Clements's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: UK
Posts: 1,637
Quote:
Originally Posted by Desaigy View Post
I am aware that this is a horrible first post:
I've been looking around and I haven't found anything mentioned about Nvida quadro fx 4000 mentioned. it seems like when I see Nvida spoken, it is with "geforce" attached to it. I just got a quadro-fx 4000 as a late christmas present and was wondering how that would fair on pcsx2.
again, I apologize for this first post.
The Quadro FX 4000 is roughly analogous to the 6800GT desktop card, so should work fine as long as you are using the right drivers etc.
Clements is offline  
Old January 25th, 2007   #47 (permalink)
Hardware Enthusiast
 
dashboardy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: blah
Posts: 808
Quote:
Do you think that upgrading the video card to one of the last nVidia, for example, will improve the fps rate, or being a laptop it is probable that it doesn't get much better?
What kind of laptop do you own? It is rarely possible to upgrade a laptop video card - it's not like swapping pci-e or agp boards in a desktop. There are laptops that you can do this on. One example is a Dell Inspiron 9400. It can be configured with GMA (intel integrated), Radeon mob x1400, or Geforce 7900GS. IF you have the inspiron 9400 with Radeon x1400 (a low - mid end card) you can purchase a GeForce 7900Gs and swap it for the Radeon X1400. However, if you own a 9400 with intel GMA, you can't swap it. So although it likely would improve speed (in pcsx2 and other games) it is also likely that it is not possible.

If it is possible, your options will be limited to one or possibly two cards.
dashboardy is offline  
Old January 25th, 2007   #48 (permalink)
emulation. emu... what???
 
jusTiC3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Germany
Posts: 463
Quote:
Originally Posted by refraction View Post
can you confirm if it works with software mode on GSDX9?
post updated ^^
__________________


ASUS G50V
jusTiC3 is offline  
Old January 25th, 2007   #49 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: At home
Posts: 942
All,

Please stop using this thread to ask questions about whether you need to upgrade or not. The point of this post is to show what hardware *does* work, it is not a place for you to ask questions about *if* it will work. Please ask your questions in your own thread. If everyone asks questions here then it will be much harder for others to find the information they are looking for.

You should only post here if you have some useful information to add to the list.
/rant
Barius is offline  
Old January 25th, 2007   #50 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Totenkopf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Bucharest, Romania KPMG office :P
Posts: 11
Just got a brand new HP Compaq NC6400 (Intel® Core™ Duo processor T2600 2.16 GHz 2 MB L2 cache 667 MHz front side bus, 2 GB (667 MHz) DDR2 SDRAM, Intel Graphics Media Accelerator 950 with up to 224 MB shared system memory) from work and tried on Super Dragonball Z - plays only a bit slower (~10-15 fps) than my current desktop (Athlon64 3000 @ 2.3Ghz, 1Gb Geil Ultra DDR400 2-3-3-6-1T @ 2.5-6-10-11-1T, Geforce 6800 NU @ 390/815), which manages to churn out 17-25fps on that and 20-70fps in FFX. Will post back with the laptop's FFX results soon and hopefully in less than a month on the new desktop (watercooled, eVGA 8800GTX superclocked, corsair dominator's, stuff like that )
Totenkopf is offline  
Old January 25th, 2007   #51 (permalink)
PCSX2 Coder
 
refraction's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Plymouth, UK
Posts: 9,822
Quote:
Originally Posted by jusTiC3 View Post
post updated ^^
cool updated mine too, to wont work ;p i think thats fair dont you?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Barius View Post
All,

Please stop using this thread to ask questions about whether you need to upgrade or not. The point of this post is to show what hardware *does* work, it is not a place for you to ask questions about *if* it will work. Please ask your questions in your own thread. If everyone asks questions here then it will be much harder for others to find the information they are looking for.

You should only post here if you have some useful information to add to the list.
/rant
yes Quatro users should do one of the following

A. try it for themselves then report the results
or
B. Look at the Geforce equivilant.

9/10 cases (if not all 10) the Geforce card is basically a Crippled Quatro.

for example the Geforce 1 was a Quatro, Geforce 2 was a Quatro 2. with a bit of knowhow and a soldering iron, you can turn your Geforce into a fully working Quatro card.
__________________

http://www.generalemu.net/
Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 @ 3.4Ghz (425x8), Leadtek GTX 280 1Gb, 1.8Tb HDs, 2Gb Corsair DDR2-800 @ DDR2-1020 5-5-5-18 Dual Channel
Dont PM me for help, use the forums, thats what its for!




Last edited by refraction; January 27th, 2007 at 13:41.. Reason: whoops, its not a Quatro into Quatro, thats just silly ;p
refraction is offline  
Old January 25th, 2007   #52 (permalink)
Registered User
 
StriderVM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Philippines
Posts: 2,055
Would it be better to seperate the old Celeron to Celeron D? I mean the old Celeron have a chance to have problem since the older models don't have SSE2, while even the earliest Celeron D does have support for SSE2....

And yeah, I tested the Celeron D, much slower, but works without a hitch.....
__________________
Current PC specs :
AsRock 945GCM-S
Pentium Dual Core E5200 @ 2912Mhz (233x12.5)
Palit Radeon 4850 Sonic 512MB gDDR3
2x2048MB Kingston DDR2 800Mhz RAM
StriderVM is offline  
Old January 26th, 2007   #53 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Michigan
Posts: 32
Put single core AMD FXs and the high end opterons under the highest catagory because those are definitely faster than the slower X2s. Also, the slower laptop Core Duos will not run it reasonably.

Just look at the bechmark YOU linked to. A single core AMD at 2.8 is even faster than a dual core at 2.2 in most games.
__________________
Opteron 144 @ 2.75GHz 1.525V
7900GT @ 632/1612 1.3V
G.Skill DDR500 @ DDR548
Epox 9NPA+ Ultra S939
3DMark06: 5164
KyuubiWarrior is offline  
Old January 26th, 2007   #54 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Illinois
Posts: 7
I can confirm that Athlon XP 2400+ combined with an IGP 320M (Radeon 7000/Radeon VE) works with Gsdx9 and fixed pipeline in most games. When I tested with Dynasty Warriors 5 XL I had to use software mode.
GodOfThunder is offline  
Old January 26th, 2007   #55 (permalink)
 
Luptatorul's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Romania
Posts: 142
i think it should be added that 2 gb of ram really help a lot the stability of the pcsx2 vm version. I had crushes with 1 gb ram out of nowhere on virtua fighter 4, right now i got only get them on one arena, and summer heat beach volleyball when reached ingame always crushed , now i can play a few rounds even if the controls are totally messed up.
__________________
PC Spec: Intel E8400 @ 4000 Mhz 1.225v (all Air cooled), 4096 Mb DDR2 OCZ Reaper 1066, ASUS P5K Premium Black Pearl, Leadtek 9800gt , Dell 2407wfp-HC , Creative T6060 5.1, WIN XP SP3 , Logitech Rumblepad 2
Luptatorul is offline  
Old January 26th, 2007   #56 (permalink)
PCSX2 Coder
 
refraction's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Plymouth, UK
Posts: 9,822
Quote:
Originally Posted by KyuubiWarrior View Post
Put single core AMD FXs and the high end opterons under the highest catagory because those are definitely faster than the slower X2s. Also, the slower laptop Core Duos will not run it reasonably.

Just look at the bechmark YOU linked to. A single core AMD at 2.8 is even faster than a dual core at 2.2 in most games.
that is an overclocked Opteron, im going of STANDARD clocks, whcih the Opteron would perform nicely but not quicker than X2's or FX dual cores
__________________

http://www.generalemu.net/
Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 @ 3.4Ghz (425x8), Leadtek GTX 280 1Gb, 1.8Tb HDs, 2Gb Corsair DDR2-800 @ DDR2-1020 5-5-5-18 Dual Channel
Dont PM me for help, use the forums, thats what its for!



refraction is offline  
Old January 27th, 2007   #57 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Michigan
Posts: 32
Quote:
Originally Posted by refraction View Post
that is an overclocked Opteron, im going of STANDARD clocks, whcih the Opteron would perform nicely but not quicker than X2's or FX dual cores
It's overclocked to the standard of the high end opterons and FXs, hence my point.
__________________
Opteron 144 @ 2.75GHz 1.525V
7900GT @ 632/1612 1.3V
G.Skill DDR500 @ DDR548
Epox 9NPA+ Ultra S939
3DMark06: 5164
KyuubiWarrior is offline  
Old January 27th, 2007   #58 (permalink)
PCSX2 Coder
 
refraction's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Plymouth, UK
Posts: 9,822
Quote:
Originally Posted by KyuubiWarrior View Post
It's overclocked to the standard of the high end opterons and FXs, hence my point.
yes and my point is a majority of people wont be overclocking, so im using standard clocks as a base for my table, overclocking does not count.
__________________

http://www.generalemu.net/
Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 @ 3.4Ghz (425x8), Leadtek GTX 280 1Gb, 1.8Tb HDs, 2Gb Corsair DDR2-800 @ DDR2-1020 5-5-5-18 Dual Channel
Dont PM me for help, use the forums, thats what its for!



refraction is offline  
Old January 27th, 2007   #59 (permalink)
Registered User
 
StriderVM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Philippines
Posts: 2,055
I have another suggestion.....

Since noobs probably don't know about onboard video cards, would it be best to just list them by name.... Like the (dreaded? ) Intel GMA series?
__________________
Current PC specs :
AsRock 945GCM-S
Pentium Dual Core E5200 @ 2912Mhz (233x12.5)
Palit Radeon 4850 Sonic 512MB gDDR3
2x2048MB Kingston DDR2 800Mhz RAM
StriderVM is offline  
Old January 27th, 2007   #60 (permalink)
PCSX2 Coder
 
refraction's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Plymouth, UK
Posts: 9,822
thats the problem you see, some of them dreaded cards actually do work! where most dont, so ive made it simple, unless its mentioned, it probably wont work
__________________

http://www.generalemu.net/
Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 @ 3.4Ghz (425x8), Leadtek GTX 280 1Gb, 1.8Tb HDs, 2Gb Corsair DDR2-800 @ DDR2-1020 5-5-5-18 Dual Channel
Dont PM me for help, use the forums, thats what its for!



refraction is offline  
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT. The time now is 01:38.

© 2006 - 2008 Emu Forums | About Emu Forums | Legal | A member of the Crowdgather Forum Community


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC5