Emuforums.com

Go Back   Emuforums.com > General Discussion > Open Discussion
About Us Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

Login to remove all ads!
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old April 17th, 2007   #1 (permalink)
the HOT asian
 
naisatoh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: my own little bubble
Posts: 179
need help choosing a computer!

So I'm on the market for a new computer, and I need some help with some of the specifications. I know I want a notebook PC with a 12 - 13 inch screen. I know I want to spend around 1600 dollars, but no more than 2000. So this is what I need help with:

What's the deal with the processors? What's the difference between the Intel Core 2 Duo Processor (seen in Sony VAIO's) and AMD Turion X2 Dual-Core (seen in HPs)? Do I need anything higher than 2.0 GHz or is 1.66 sufficient?

I'll be using my computer mainly for work (just word processing), music, movies, photoshopping, and flash. I don't really play any video games, but I've played Warcraft III on occasion. Nothing big.

Any help from your expertise or personal experience would be highly appreciated. Thanks in advance!
naisatoh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 17th, 2007   #2 (permalink)
Registered User
 
asmdeus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: US
Posts: 113
Intel C2D is much better than the amd x2.

This should be a good selection to start with Newegg.com - Buy Computer Parts, PC Components, Laptop Computers, Digital Cameras and more!
__________________

Rig:
Mobo: Gigabyte GA-P35-DS3L
CPU : Intel E2180 @ 3.40GHZ (340x10)
RAM : x2 1024 Corsair DDR2 816mhz 4-4-4-12-2T
GFX : Palit 8800GT @ 700/1000/1700
asmdeus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 17th, 2007   #3 (permalink)
the HOT asian
 
naisatoh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: my own little bubble
Posts: 179
Thanks so much for the info? Can anyone tell me anything about 1.66 compared to a 2.0? For my needs, is a 1.66 sufficient?
naisatoh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 17th, 2007   #4 (permalink)
Insomniac in training...
 
skoreanime's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Canada
Posts: 3,878
The Intel Core 2 Duo is better in more ways then one. The main reason I'd choose over it then the Turion is because it doesn't need as much power, which is a big plus for notebooks. And 1.66Ghz Core 2 Duo is more then enough to fill your needs by the sound of it. WC III doesn't even need a dual-core to run perfectly fine. My friend had a 2.0Ghz Pentium M laptop 5 years ago and it ran WC III perfectly fine.
__________________

Born free, riding free, living free. Always be free.

Q6600 @ 3Ghz, 333x9
Gigabyte DS3R, Rev1.0
Patriot Extreme DDR2 PC-6400RAM
BFG 9800GX2 @ stock
skoreanime is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 17th, 2007   #5 (permalink)
the HOT asian
 
naisatoh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: my own little bubble
Posts: 179
Thanks again for your input. In your expert opinions, what tasks would require a boost from the 1.66 to the 2.0? They're almost 200 dollars in difference!
naisatoh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 17th, 2007   #6 (permalink)
Insomniac in training...
 
skoreanime's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Canada
Posts: 3,878
Almost nothing really. That's why most people like to just go for the cheaper one. The people who dish out the cash for the more expensive processor do it because they can. Also people who know they'll be doing very intensive stuff on their laptop, like CAD or heavy programs like PCSX2 .

IMO, if WC III is the most intensive thing you're going to do on your laptop, I'd go for the cheaper CPU and put that money towards nice little accessories, like a new bag or something .
__________________

Born free, riding free, living free. Always be free.

Q6600 @ 3Ghz, 333x9
Gigabyte DS3R, Rev1.0
Patriot Extreme DDR2 PC-6400RAM
BFG 9800GX2 @ stock
skoreanime is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 17th, 2007   #7 (permalink)
Dox
 
Holic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 690
If I were to get a new PC it would have to have 2 GB ram minimum for Vista and to make it 'fairly' future proof.

If you can afford it then buy a DX10 card like 8800gts 320mb or wait till 8600 comes out,

It will save you money in the long run.
__________________
Find the keys to your life.
Holic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 17th, 2007   #8 (permalink)
Hardware Enthusiast
 
dashboardy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: blah
Posts: 808
Quote:
Originally Posted by naisatoh View Post
So I'm on the market for a new computer, and I need some help with some of the specifications. I know I want a notebook PC with a 12 - 13 inch screen. I know I want to spend around 1600 dollars, but no more than 2000. So this is what I need help with:

What's the deal with the processors? What's the difference between the Intel Core 2 Duo Processor (seen in Sony VAIO's) and AMD Turion X2 Dual-Core (seen in HPs)? Do I need anything higher than 2.0 GHz or is 1.66 sufficient?

I'll be using my computer mainly for work (just word processing), music, movies, photoshopping, and flash. I don't really play any video games, but I've played Warcraft III on occasion. Nothing big.

Any help from your expertise or personal experience would be highly appreciated. Thanks in advance!
Any notebook you buy today, whether integrated video card or single core, will run WCIII very quickly. The Core 2 Duo's are better as they use less power (as skore mentioned) and have better performance.
Quote:
Originally Posted by naisatoh View Post
Thanks so much for the info? Can anyone tell me anything about 1.66 compared to a 2.0? For my needs, is a 1.66 sufficient?
not a whole lot. If you care, you might be able to encode the first 5 minutes of terminator III DVD 20 seconds faster. For general purpose, even gaming, the difference will be negligible. For photoshopping there'd be some difference, but 1.66 ghz core 2 duo is more than sufficient.
Quote:
Originally Posted by skoreanime View Post
The Intel Core 2 Duo is better in more ways then one. The main reason I'd choose over it then the Turion is because it doesn't need as much power, which is a big plus for notebooks. And 1.66Ghz Core 2 Duo is more then enough to fill your needs by the sound of it. WC III doesn't even need a dual-core to run perfectly fine. My friend had a 2.0Ghz Pentium M laptop 5 years ago and it ran WC III perfectly fine.
very sound reasoning, good advice. other than the fact that pentium M wasn't around 5 years ago
Quote:
Originally Posted by xxxHolic View Post
If I were to get a new PC it would have to have 2 GB ram minimum for Vista and to make it 'fairly' future proof.

If you can afford it then buy a DX10 card like 8800gts 320mb or wait till 8600 comes out,

It will save you money in the long run.
horrid advice. First, an 8800gts is a HIGH end video card, and not only that IT IS A DESKTOP CARD ONLY. I wouldn't really call that saving money at all - more like a waste of money if all you want to do is play warcraft. Maybe that's what YOU would do if you bought a new computer; your post seemed fairly random. you cannot put a desktop card into a laptop. also laptop cards cannot be upgraded, so even if it were a laptop video card, it likely wouldn't fit in any laptop except one specifically designed to fit in it.

I own a laptop with the following specifications:
Toshiba Satellite A10
2.2 GHz Celeron D
512 MB DDR RAM
Integrated GMA 32 MB 82852/82855 Graphics controller
40 GB hard drive.

You can't find a computer slower than this on the market today. But I can play Warcraft III with 1.21 patch very quickly (did last night) on this machine - that said, any machine you purchase today for any price will play warcraft III perfectly. no need for a high end video card. Also, Windows Vista is not great for gaming, and 2 GB RAM is not needed right now for gaming especially for laptops. 1GB should be just fine, especially if you play older games.

oh ya, and i think this belongs in hardware discussion.

Last edited by dashboardy; April 17th, 2007 at 08:54. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
dashboardy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 17th, 2007   #9 (permalink)
Dox
 
Holic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 690
sorry I didn't read th first post,
I just saw the title , and assume PC

My bad.
__________________
Find the keys to your life.
Holic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 17th, 2007   #10 (permalink)
Ramma Gay
 
Cid Highwind's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Somwhere out in space? The Land of the Free? Heaven or Hell?
Posts: 11,536
Quote:
Originally Posted by asmdeus View Post
Intel C2D is much better than the amd x2.

This should be a good selection to start with Newegg.com - Buy Computer Parts, PC Components, Laptop Computers, Digital Cameras and more!
Actually that's not true, they just offer a better overclock potential than AMD64x2, which is a non-issue in laptops. However, they do produce less heat and draw less power. But saying AMDx2 is not as fast as C2D is a bit of a too quick conclusion imho

Naisatoh: I recommended having 2gb of ram. 1GB will do for now, but if you want to upgrade to Vista, or if it will have Vista installed already, you won't regret the upgrade.
__________________


Geometry Wars: 198.400
Lumines: 523.879


Rip: Cid's Bleemcast 28-08-2007

X360/Wii/PS3 belong to the current generation, update your mindset FFS
Cid Highwind is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 17th, 2007   #11 (permalink)
the HOT asian
 
naisatoh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: my own little bubble
Posts: 179
Thanks so much! Yeah I considered placing this in the hardware category, but it's such a broad topic. I really appreciate all your help.. it's been a long time since I posted on these boards and I am always impressed by how helpful and knowledgeable you are in answering questions.

I will definitely be getting the 2gb of ram. I do a lot of multitasking and have been caught working through a choppy computer on my current 1gb.

Also, I actually have played Warcraft III in years. I just mention it because it happens to be the last gave I ever played on a computer. I actually don't have much time to play computer games anymore, as working in the hospital has taken over my life (3rd year medical student).

I do plan on getting Vista with my new system, as new computers are being sold with the OS preinstalled. As long as it'll run photoshop or flash, as well as play my movies and music, I'm good to go. Will 1.66 GHz run Vista?
naisatoh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 17th, 2007   #12 (permalink)
DJ-Roadkill
 
ian209's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Canada
Posts: 497
Quote:
Originally Posted by asmdeus View Post
Intel C2D is much better than the amd x2.

This should be a good selection to start with Newegg.com - Buy Computer Parts, PC Components, Laptop Computers, Digital Cameras and more!
not MUCH better. The performance diff isnt that big. If u're on a tight budget, don't want to overclock, and want a dual core, go for something like the AMD Athlon X2 3800+, 4200+, or 4600+. Those are all cheaper than the C2D E4300 and comes really close performance wise.

But if ure looking for a l33t computer, and are planning to overclock, get any C2D.
__________________
Asus Maximus Formula
Intel Q6600 @ 3.8Ghz (Air Cooled w/T.R.U.E)
ATI Radeon HD3870 (OCed 994/1200)
OCZ 4GB Platinum PC2-6400 (5-4-4-15)
Mushkin XP650w PSU
3X 320GB HDDs
1X 500GB HDD
36.7GB WD Raptor
TT VA8000BWS black

Others: Logitech G7 Mouse and G25 Wheel, Smartjoy PS2USB, Yamaha HTR-5370 A/V Reciever, Samsung SyncMaster 931c,
Dual MTX MXS1204 12' 800w Subs w/ RFF 1000w Amp

http://www.ilike.com/artist/djroadkill - Check out my music.
ian209 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 22nd, 2007   #13 (permalink)
the HOT asian
 
naisatoh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: my own little bubble
Posts: 179
any other thoughts? please?
naisatoh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 22nd, 2007   #14 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: In your bed.
Posts: 808
My bro has an IBM. It automatically stops the hard-drive when the PC has a shock.
mogster is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT. The time now is 16:42.

© 2006 - 2008 Emu Forums | About Emu Forums | Legal | A member of the Crowdgather Forum Community


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0 Release Candidate 3
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC5