Whats your Higest 3d2001 Bench Mark Score?

Light-Force · January 12th, 2002

Im just curious to what people can get on 3d 2001 benchmark

I just managed to get a 7327, But with my system i figure i should beable to do better... im just curious how you people are doing on it

K.I.L.E.R · January 12th, 2002

a look at my profile.

Light-Force · January 12th, 2002

S*)&T man thats very impressive...im working on getting mine up there too.... I just gotta oc some stuff and ill make it

do you know the save oc level for the 8500

Nightmare · January 12th, 2002

Quote:

Originally posted by K.I.L.E.R
a look at my profile.

Thats a very high marks, what setting u used to get that marks? default setting?

Nightmare · January 12th, 2002

Quote:

Originally posted by Light-Force
S*)&T man thats very impressive...im working on getting mine up there too.... I just gotta oc some stuff and ill make it

do you know the save oc level for the 8500

I think there is no such a thing called "save oc level", every card has its own limitation i think.

K.I.L.E.R · January 12th, 2002

Try a g3 overclocked to 601.4mhz ddr sdram.

JAZ · January 12th, 2002

Whats the point of 3d2001 anyway....Everyone knows its biased towards Nvidia cards anyway..As long as my games run fast I dont care what mark I get,take my old Radeon64 I got 3600ish last time I ran it (many months ago) but all my games run at very decent FPS with little or no slowdown at the resolution I prefer to play at 1280x1024.
Fair enough its quite good for using to see what effects various tweaks have to your score (messing with your FSB/overclocking your card etc)
I see K.I.L.E.R gets 12000 odd and thats a very impresive score does this mean you get 4x the performance of my card or summat as if so Im sure its great playin Quake3 or whatever with 200 frames a sec but whats the point of that as with the 70fps I get there is no or very little visable slowdown any way...
Oh K.I.L.E.R can you please post your compare url here as I would like to see the details of it thanx.....
edited a spelling mistake.......

JAZ · January 12th, 2002

Light-Force if you want info on clocking your card go over to the forums at www.Rage3d.com

**Raziel** · January 12th, 2002

Ah ah,crap,12009

Total bull****,can you give us a link to your compare URl?
I want a proof.

JAZ · January 12th, 2002

Yes me thinx u dreaming a bit with that score killer plz feel free to prove me wrong if you can...
Heres the top scores I could find and unless you are a very very serious overclocker with acsess to loads of hardware to screen it and find the best parts then I very much doubt you would beat all these scores....

CPU Score
Stingers Bench-Icrontic team
2001-12-20 13:26:14
xxxx@hotmail.com 640x480x16
NVIDIA GeForce3 Ti 500
AMD Athlon(tm) XP/MP/4 1954 Mhz
12018

Icrontic 3DMark team Unlimited test with Abit KR7A-Raid Athlon XP1.6ghz@1.85ghz(168x11) & GF3 Ti500 282/605
2002-01-01 20:31:22
xxxxxx@charter.net 640x480x16
NVIDIA GeForce3 Ti 500
AMD Athlon(tm) XP/MP/4 1852 Mhz
11823

CABOJOE...Icrontic 3DMark Team
2002-01-07 20:26:02
xxxxx@home.com 640x480x16
NVIDIA GeForce3 Ti 500
AMD Athlon(tm) XP/MP/4 1925 Mhz
11614

**D>JESUS**SiLLy Gf3 ScOrE
2002-01-09 09:18:53
xxxxx@pacbell.net 640x480x16
NVIDIA GeForce3 Ti 500
Intel Pentium 4 2520 Mhz
11566

**Demigod** · January 12th, 2002

Quote:

Originally posted by JAZ
Whats the point of 3d2001 anyway....Everyone knows its biased towards Nvidia cards anyway..As long as my games run fast I dont care what mark I get,take my old Radeon64 I got 3600ish last time I ran it (many months ago) but all my games run at very decent FPS with little or no slowdown at the resolution I prefer to play at 1280x1024.

Actually, the highest score obtained in 3DMark2001 is with a Radeon 8500. I don't know the exact score but you can check it up on Mad Onion's web site. Either he customized his benchmark in a certain way or he's lying. There's no way he'd reach that score with the default benchmark.

JAZ · January 12th, 2002

Yes Demi I just saw that when I was at mad onions site R8500's have the top scores...
But that dont really prove anything does it..

**fivefeet8** · January 12th, 2002

Quote:

Originally posted by JAZ
Yes me thinx u dreaming a bit with that score killer plz feel free to prove me wrong if you can...
Heres the top scores I could find and unless you are a very very serious overclocker with acsess to loads of hardware to screen it and find the best parts then I very much doubt you would beat all these scores....

CPU Score
Stingers Bench-Icrontic team
2001-12-20 13:26:14
xxxx@hotmail.com 640x480x16
NVIDIA GeForce3 Ti 500
AMD Athlon(tm) XP/MP/4 1954 Mhz
12018

Icrontic 3DMark team Unlimited test with Abit KR7A-Raid Athlon XP1.6ghz@1.85ghz(168x11) & GF3 Ti500 282/605
2002-01-01 20:31:22
xxxxxx@charter.net 640x480x16
NVIDIA GeForce3 Ti 500
AMD Athlon(tm) XP/MP/4 1852 Mhz
11823

CABOJOE...Icrontic 3DMark Team
2002-01-07 20:26:02
xxxxx@home.com 640x480x16
NVIDIA GeForce3 Ti 500
AMD Athlon(tm) XP/MP/4 1925 Mhz
11614

**D>JESUS**SiLLy Gf3 ScOrE
2002-01-09 09:18:53
xxxxx@pacbell.net 640x480x16
NVIDIA GeForce3 Ti 500
Intel Pentium 4 2520 Mhz
11566

All at 640x480? Pff.. We need some type of default settings.. Who really plays PC games at that resolution? At that resolution, the system CPU is being more worked.. So in actuallity, that is mostly a CPU test.. The faster your CPU, the higher your score... Benchmarking at higher resolutions is where the video cards start showing it's true power..

**kairi00** · January 12th, 2002

fivefeet8: exactly.... those 640x480x16 3DMark2001 scores don't prove anything. Show me scores using the default benchmark (or higher; try 1280x1024x32bit), then we'll talk.

**Raziel** · January 12th, 2002

The top score in 3dMark2k1 is holded by a webmaster who seriously moded his mobo and GeForce 3 Ti 500(water cooling at -48°!!!! + increased voltage on both video card and CPU,with some real intensive overclocking!).
He got something aroun 100xx,but unless you're really the best tweaker in the world with a gift for overclocking to nuts,I don't think you're score is real.

(Oh! And if anyone sees him again in this thread,call me

)

Light-Force · January 12th, 2002

yeah, because my comlputer (in my sig) is pretty much a godly machine, and i only can pull out 8000 3d marks...so i dont know how you can pull a 12000

UrashimaKeitaro · January 13th, 2002

This is not a 3DMark2001 but 3DMark2000 that maybe interesting.

My friend benchmark his PC (Xeon III 550 MHz + Matrox G200) and he got over 15000. Yes Five teen with three zero.

Nightmare · January 13th, 2002

Quote:

Originally posted by fivefeet8

All at 640x480? Pff.. We need some type of default settings.. Who really plays PC games at that resolution?

Sorry.. i play pc games at that resolution...

Spec...
Athlon 1.4
128 ram
Elsa Geforce 2 GTS PRO

**fivefeet8** · January 13th, 2002

Quote:

Originally posted by Nightmare

Sorry.. i play pc games at that resolution...

Spec...
Athlon 1.4
128 ram
Elsa Geforce 2 GTS PRO

well. you have 3 eyes so ... no wonder.. hehe..

**Demigod** · January 14th, 2002

Quote:

Originally posted by Nightmare
Sorry.. i play pc games at that resolution...

Yeah, me too. I play all my games at 640x480x32 w/ 4xFSAA... I guess technically I play at 1280x960x32 then..

January 12th, 2002	#1 (permalink)
Light-Force Registered User Join Date: Aug 2001 Location: Kelowna, BC CANADA <--- Hell Yah! Posts: 169	Whats your Higest 3d2001 Bench Mark Score? Im just curious to what people can get on 3d 2001 benchmark I just managed to get a 7327, But with my system i figure i should beable to do better... im just curious how you people are doing on it __________________ Thunder Bird 1.2 @ 1.4 Ghz, 768 Megs PC 2100 DDR ram. ATI Radeon 8500 (yes the best card money can buy ) MSI K7T PRO 266 DDR MB (yes its phat) and a Sound Blaster Live 5.1 EAX sound card with 4 Speaker +sub Surround sound system oh yeah baby!!!!!

January 12th, 2002	#2 (permalink)
K.I.L.E.R Registered User Join Date: Jan 2002 Posts: 2,338	take a look at my profile. __________________ Agent of love and justice, beautiful Sailor Senshi Sailor Moon.

January 12th, 2002	#3 (permalink)
Light-Force Registered User Join Date: Aug 2001 Location: Kelowna, BC CANADA <--- Hell Yah! Posts: 169	S*)&T man thats very impressive...im working on getting mine up there too.... I just gotta oc some stuff and ill make it do you know the save oc level for the 8500 __________________ Thunder Bird 1.2 @ 1.4 Ghz, 768 Megs PC 2100 DDR ram. ATI Radeon 8500 (yes the best card money can buy ) MSI K7T PRO 266 DDR MB (yes its phat) and a Sound Blaster Live 5.1 EAX sound card with 4 Speaker +sub Surround sound system oh yeah baby!!!!!

January 12th, 2002	#6 (permalink)
K.I.L.E.R Registered User Join Date: Jan 2002 Posts: 2,338	Nightmare Try a g3 overclocked to 601.4mhz ddr sdram. __________________ Agent of love and justice, beautiful Sailor Senshi Sailor Moon.

January 12th, 2002	#7 (permalink)
JAZ Nintendo Zealot Join Date: Apr 2001 Location: UK Posts: 1,424	Whats the point of 3d2001 anyway....Everyone knows its biased towards Nvidia cards anyway..As long as my games run fast I dont care what mark I get,take my old Radeon64 I got 3600ish last time I ran it (many months ago) but all my games run at very decent FPS with little or no slowdown at the resolution I prefer to play at 1280x1024. Fair enough its quite good for using to see what effects various tweaks have to your score (messing with your FSB/overclocking your card etc) I see K.I.L.E.R gets 12000 odd and thats a very impresive score does this mean you get 4x the performance of my card or summat as if so Im sure its great playin Quake3 or whatever with 200 frames a sec but whats the point of that as with the 70fps I get there is no or very little visable slowdown any way... Oh K.I.L.E.R can you please post your compare url here as I would like to see the details of it thanx..... edited a spelling mistake....... Last edited by JAZ; January 12th, 2002 at 12:57.

January 12th, 2002	#8 (permalink)
JAZ Nintendo Zealot Join Date: Apr 2001 Location: UK Posts: 1,424	Light-Force if you want info on clocking your card go over to the forums at www.Rage3d.com

January 12th, 2002	#9 (permalink)
Raziel Beta Administrator Join Date: Apr 2001 Location: Nantes, France Posts: 6,147	Ah ah,crap,12009 Total bull**,can you give us a link to your compare URl? I want a proof. __________________ System Specs: OS: Windows Vista Ultimate x64 Edition CPU: Intel Core 2 Duo E8500 @4GHz Video Card: MSI GeForce 8800 GTX Motherboard: ASUS Maximus Formula SE RAM: 4GB OCZ XMS2 PC6400 Sound Card:** Creative Sound Blaster Audigy 2 ZS

January 12th, 2002	#10 (permalink)
JAZ Nintendo Zealot Join Date: Apr 2001 Location: UK Posts: 1,424	Yes me thinx u dreaming a bit with that score killer plz feel free to prove me wrong if you can... Heres the top scores I could find and unless you are a very very serious overclocker with acsess to loads of hardware to screen it and find the best parts then I very much doubt you would beat all these scores.... CPU Score Stingers Bench-Icrontic team 2001-12-20 13:26:14 xxxx@hotmail.com 640x480x16 NVIDIA GeForce3 Ti 500 AMD Athlon(tm) XP/MP/4 1954 Mhz 12018 Icrontic 3DMark team Unlimited test with Abit KR7A-Raid Athlon XP1.6ghz@1.85ghz(168x11) & GF3 Ti500 282/605 2002-01-01 20:31:22 xxxxxx@charter.net 640x480x16 NVIDIA GeForce3 Ti 500 AMD Athlon(tm) XP/MP/4 1852 Mhz 11823 CABOJOE...Icrontic 3DMark Team 2002-01-07 20:26:02 xxxxx@home.com 640x480x16 NVIDIA GeForce3 Ti 500 AMD Athlon(tm) XP/MP/4 1925 Mhz 11614 D>JESUSSiLLy Gf3 ScOrE 2002-01-09 09:18:53 xxxxx@pacbell.net 640x480x16 NVIDIA GeForce3 Ti 500 Intel Pentium 4 2520 Mhz 11566 Last edited by JAZ; January 12th, 2002 at 17:24.

January 12th, 2002	#12 (permalink)
JAZ Nintendo Zealot Join Date: Apr 2001 Location: UK Posts: 1,424	Yes Demi I just saw that when I was at mad onions site R8500's have the top scores... But that dont really prove anything does it..

January 12th, 2002	#14 (permalink)
kairi00 Puchiko-nyu! Join Date: Jul 2001 Location: 49° 11' N 123° 10' W Posts: 2,854	fivefeet8: exactly.... those 640x480x16 3DMark2001 scores don't prove anything. Show me scores using the default benchmark (or higher; try 1280x1024x32bit), then we'll talk. __________________ "Not every ejaculation deserves a name." --- George Carlin Last edited by kairi00; January 12th, 2002 at 18:49.

January 12th, 2002	#15 (permalink)
Raziel Beta Administrator Join Date: Apr 2001 Location: Nantes, France Posts: 6,147	The top score in 3dMark2k1 is holded by a webmaster who seriously moded his mobo and GeForce 3 Ti 500(water cooling at -48°!!!! + increased voltage on both video card and CPU,with some real intensive overclocking!). He got something aroun 100xx,but unless you're really the best tweaker in the world with a gift for overclocking to nuts,I don't think you're score is real. (Oh! And if anyone sees him again in this thread,call me ) __________________ System Specs: OS: Windows Vista Ultimate x64 Edition CPU: Intel Core 2 Duo E8500 @4GHz Video Card: MSI GeForce 8800 GTX Motherboard: ASUS Maximus Formula SE RAM: 4GB OCZ XMS2 PC6400 Sound Card: Creative Sound Blaster Audigy 2 ZS

January 12th, 2002	#16 (permalink)
Light-Force Registered User Join Date: Aug 2001 Location: Kelowna, BC CANADA <--- Hell Yah! Posts: 169	yeah, because my comlputer (in my sig) is pretty much a godly machine, and i only can pull out 8000 3d marks...so i dont know how you can pull a 12000 __________________ Thunder Bird 1.2 @ 1.4 Ghz, 768 Megs PC 2100 DDR ram. ATI Radeon 8500 (yes the best card money can buy ) MSI K7T PRO 266 DDR MB (yes its phat) and a Sound Blaster Live 5.1 EAX sound card with 4 Speaker +sub Surround sound system oh yeah baby!!!!!

January 13th, 2002	#17 (permalink)
UrashimaKeitaro Registered User Join Date: Dec 2001 Location: Hinata Sou Posts: 56	This is not a 3DMark2001 but 3DMark2000 that maybe interesting. My friend benchmark his PC (Xeon III 550 MHz + Matrox G200) and he got over 15000. Yes Five teen with three zero. __________________ Ummm...I'm not good in English. That's why I failed the Toudai test 3 times. I hope everyone understand.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode