|
|
|||||||
| About Us | Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#21 (permalink) |
|
Belldandy you r0x0r!!!
![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 434
|
I would recomend you use PJ 64 version 1.4. I use that to play most of my ROMS with. If i have a ROM that does not work with it i then try some of the other emulators. What i tend to do is keep a version of the best two emmulators (in my opinion), PJ 64 and Nemu 64 on my PC. So that if one doesnt run too god in my first choice (PJ 64) then i would try it in the second one (Nemu 64). Its kinda like a primary and secondary setup. And if the rare ROM does not work in eithe, for example Ogre Battle then generally that means chances are the ROM will not work in any emulator.
I havent tried 1964 yet. I must spend some time experimenting with it on my system.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 (permalink) |
|
The Pretty One
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: May 2001
Location: Collegedale, TN
Posts: 1,247
|
1964 is well worth trying, much better than nemu in my opinion. Actually, slightly better than pj64 in my opinion too. I've had less stability problems and greater performance with 1964.
__________________
"Me? I'm a pop idol." "And you will shed tears of scarlet!" |
|
|
|
|
|
#24 (permalink) |
|
Key To The Universe
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Stratosphere
Posts: 2,706
|
If Pj64 is working, 1964 probably will work too. I think it has lower requirements. Runs much faster than PJ64 in my system.
__________________
But there is someone who remembers you Someone waiting for a sign that leads the way to you There is someone who will die for you Keep that in mind when the hope fails |
|
|
|
|
|
#26 (permalink) |
|
Key To The Universe
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Stratosphere
Posts: 2,706
|
Check my profile. I know I need an upgrade, but if 1964 runs with my specs, it will certainly run fine with yours.
__________________
But there is someone who remembers you Someone waiting for a sign that leads the way to you There is someone who will die for you Keep that in mind when the hope fails |
|
|
|
|
|
#28 (permalink) |
|
Key To The Universe
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Stratosphere
Posts: 2,706
|
I didn't say it runs good on my computer. I only said that it runs. Using Glide64 I can get a decent speed(not full speed, but at least playable). With other plugins(very few actually work with my Voodoo2) it runs very slowly.
__________________
But there is someone who remembers you Someone waiting for a sign that leads the way to you There is someone who will die for you Keep that in mind when the hope fails |
|
|
|
|
|
#29 (permalink) |
|
Belldandy you r0x0r!!!
![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 434
|
WOW. 1964 rons Zelda: OoT really well. Nice and fats as well. Looks unbelevable with the antialiasing effect of my Geforce4 turned on.
But i suppose Zelda would be an easy game to test it on.I tried Conkers Bad Fur day as well and it does run really fast but does seem to have some graphic issues. A few little things here and there nothing big though. I was impressed at how good Aelda looked though. Might be worth while getting some fullscreen FSAAx4xS pics of it. The good thing is that it ran really smooth as well at 1024x768 resolution. Looks like i might be testing some more games on this emulator .Oh yeah i was unable to get the latest version to work, 7.3. So i was running 7.2. 7.3 Kept on craching for some reason. Ill probably get it working later. Cant be bothered at the moment. The plugins i used were- Jabo's D3D7 1.40 Azimers Audio v0.30 (driver rev 2.2) Basiic Keyboard plugin
__________________
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|