|
|
|||||||
| About Us | Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
-
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: -
Posts: 1,936
|
-data-
The battle between Blu-ray and HD-DVD to control the high-definition DVD market could be solved by a laser that can read the two competing formats. According to reports in the Japanese press, Ricoh is developing a system that uses a single component to read both kinds of discs. HD-DVD discs and regular DVDs hold data 0.6mm from the surface of the disc, while Blu-ray discs must be read at 0.1mm from the surface. Ricoh's optical laser technology uses a "diffraction grate" to read the discs at the correct level. However, the technology will initially be used only in high-definition DVD players because the process decreases the intensity of the beam. To counterbalance this effect, the devices will use higher powered lasers. The technology will be on show for the first time at Tokyo's International Optoelectronics Exhibition on Wednesday. According to Ricoh, the optical laser will be ready for use in devices by the end of the year and will be offered to OEM companies at that time. -data- |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) | |
|
XBOX Modder
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Utah
Posts: 659
|
Quote:
They should just stick with the superior design of the two. They need to quit competing, and chill out. Cant we all just get a bong? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) |
|
Mr. Stupendous
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Here, There and Everywhere.
Posts: 1,132
|
competition means lower prices for us. nobody wants to see a monopoly of formats, despite what you guys think.
__________________
The HTPC E2160 @ 3.1ghz | Thermaltake The Orb cooler | Abit ip35-pro | 4Gb DDR-II pc6400| 1.00Tb of WD AAKS storage | Asus Xonar D2| 360 HD-DVD drive Pioneer bd204 bluray sata drive | Corsair HX620w PSU | BFG GeForce 8800GTX | Silverstone SST-LC17b | 24" DGM TFT | 40" 1080p SONY 40w2000 ONKYO TX-SR805 | bi-amped mission m71i fronts | eltax center & bipolar rears 2x 12" custom built subwoofers powered by a denon pma-100m | PS3 with linux and a 250gb 3.5" internal drive | Nintendo wii |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) |
|
War Games coder
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,918
|
I'd tend to agree - multiple formats initially are not a bad thing. Think of it this way, a hypothetical situation:
A company (smalltech) comes out with a HD media device that reads and writes to a small form factor optical disc (say, 2" diameter). Writing can be gel-based, just like current technology, and it can store 120G of data (though the burners take 8-12 hours to burn that much data). Another comany (nanotech) comes out with a HD media device based on flash media. Using an insane (tm) lossless compression schema, they can store 12 hours of video on a 2G USB flash drive - Effectively, the only thing the consumer pays for is an insane (tm) hardware decoder for the insane (tm) compression and a simple USB 2.0 interface. Integration with a PC is easy, and open source software decoders are already available (though you need a beefy CPU to decode them). Note: In case nobody picked up on this, both of the above are fictional, hypothetical cases. Now, would you really want one technology to completely disappear? Granted, in the Blue-Ray vs. HD-DVD, the technologies are not that different from each other... but I'd be hesitant to set up a precedent.
__________________
Primary CPU: Athlon 64 X2 4400+ Mobo: Biostar N4SLI-A9 RAM: 2G Crucial (DDR400) Video: eVGA GeForce 7900 GTX (512M) Audio: HDA X-Mystique HD(s): Maxtor 300G SATA2, Samsung 400G SATA2 OS(s): WinXP x64 Pro, Vista x32 Ultimate, Gentoo x64 Monitor(s): Primary - 19" Flat Panel (1280x1024) Secondary - 19" Flat Panel (1280x1024) Tertiary - Zenith 42" Plasma TV (1024x768 res) Many other machines... sig too short |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|