The Official Benchmark and Comparison Thread! - Page 7

skoreanime · March 5th, 2007

Yeah yeah, I know. But I won't be the one weeping once my precioussssss's come out

. I scored 4600-4700 in 3dMark05 and about 1200-1500 in 06 on my laptop. Just shows how much pain I'm causing my Conroe at the moment by pairing it up with my friends first used PCI-E card...

dashboardy · March 6th, 2007

your x700 kills it that much??? wow. that's a large difference. Anyways that's strange that your score is only 1200-1500 on your laptop. Are those both stock scores (no OC'ing video card?) cause my laptop gets 4700 oc'd in 3dmark05 while it gets about 2000 in 06. I guess I DO have Core 2 and not just core duo...

skoreanime · March 6th, 2007

The Core 2 Duo (Merom) performs quite a bit better then the Core Duo (Yonah). I can see you scoring higher then me. The point difference sounds about right, Merom performs almost 10% better then Yonah.

And yes, x700 does indeed suck. I mean, it barely, and I stress barely, any performance gain over the ATI 9800. I'm serious

. The R600's were supposed to be released this week...but instead, they're delayed at least until the next month

.

dashboardy · March 6th, 2007

Quote:

Originally Posted by skoreanime

Yeah yeah, I know. But I won't be the one weeping once my precioussssss's come out

. I scored 4600-4700 in 3dMark05 and about 1200-1500 in 06 on my laptop. Just shows how much pain I'm causing my Conroe at the moment by pairing it up with my friends first used PCI-E card...

That was actually what i was referring to - our 3dmark05 scores are the same? I OC my vid card w/ merom in and get about 4700. i read notebookreview and apparently with core duo stock is normally about 3800

skoreanime · March 8th, 2007

Yeah, I did OC the GPU quite a bit for the 05 mark. I never touched the CPU though, and I never will. Not such a good idea to mess with it

.

inforce · March 16th, 2007

Im gonna go do some 3dmarking because I am bored.. lol .. before and after overclocking Ill be back.

Alright .. after 4 test these are my results.. 1400 X 900 widescreen for all.
Well i saved them but i cant open them for some reason. Maybe i didnt save em right. And i dont feel like going through a half hour of testing again. These are guesses at what they were.. should be close.
1400x900 4xAA 4xAF 2500
1400x900 0xAA 4xAF 3500
1400x900 4xAA 4xAF 3100 overclocked*
1400x900 0xAA 4xAD 6517 overclocked*

I don't usually play games at that res, rather 1280x780 or whatever. But the bottom score after overclocking impressed me. During that test, when i was
in the "wings of fury game test", I was getting 100-600fps at points LoL.

__________________

Intel Celeron D 3.3ghz // 1.5Gigs ddr2 ram
Biostar Geforce 7600 GS 400/300 - 550/500 overclocked
WindowsXPsp2 // OSx86 // 3626.7kps cable modem
20 inch widescreen LCD // Dual Layer DVDRW
C:\ - 80GB D:\ - 80GB
Owner and Designer of Hazelingerie.com
Star Trek Pwnz!

Last edited by inforce; March 16th, 2007 at 01:35.. Reason: Automerged Doublepost

**CKemu** · March 23rd, 2007

Well got my nice new GeForce 8800GTX 768MB today, my old GPU (the 7600GT) scored 3133 marks in 3Dmark06...some improvement huh, my RAM sadly is crap and I need some non-stock cooling to OC my CPU abit to push my score up nicely..

Just added my 3Dmark03 score for laughs

Attached Images

	0x1.jpg (71.4 KB, 58 views)
	03.jpg (62.6 KB, 45 views)

__________________

Last edited by CKemu; March 24th, 2007 at 16:47..

**fivefeet8** · April 8th, 2007

A programmer at nvnews.net released a simple GPU benchmarking performance tool.

"Forum member tertsi has announced the initial public beta release of gpudip. gpudip measures the number of low-level instructions, floating-point operations, texture samples and color pixels a GPU can execute.
Tasks that are executed include blending, sharpening, blurring and edge detection, which are common in applications list Photoshop, Gimp, and also some games." - nvnews.net

"gpudip (based on gpuinstr) measures how many low-level instructions, floating-point operations, texture samples and color pixels a graphics processor can execute in digital image processing or gpgpu tasks such as blending, sharpen, blur and edge detect." -author

You can download the tool from this thread:
gpudip - performance tool for digital image processing and gpgpu - nV News Forums - version at 0.8

Here are my results with my 8800gtx(stock).

Code:

GL_RENDERER : GeForce 8800 GTX 
GL_VENDOR : NVIDIA Corporation 
GL_VERSION : 2.1.1 
Driver Name : nvoglnt.dll 
Driver Company : NVIDIA Corporation 
Driver Version : 6.14.11.0102 
Driver Description : NVIDIA Compatible OpenGL ICD 
  
ARB_fragment_program 
ALU Instructions : 8192 [ ABS ADD COS DP3 DP4 DPH DST EX2 FLR FRC LG2 LIT LRP MAD MAX MIN MOV MUL POW RCP RSQ SCS SIN SUB XPD ] 
TEX Instructions : 8192 
TEX Indirections : 8192 
Program Instructions : 8192 
Temporaries : 4096 
Parameters : 1024 
Local Parameters : 512 
Env. Parameters : 256 
Texture Coords : 8 
Texture Image Units : 32 
Texture Size : 8192 x 8192 
Texture Rectangle Size : 8192 x 8192 
Draw Buffers : 8 
Renderbuffer Size : 8192 x 8192 
  
NV_fragment_program 
ALU Instructions : [ ADD COS DP3 DP4 DST EX2 FLR FRC LG2 LIT LRP MAD MAX MIN MOV MUL POW RCP RSQ SIN SUB RFL ] 
Local Parameters : 512 
Texture Coords : 8 
Texture Image Units : 32 
  
NV_fragment_program2 
ALU Instructions : [ DIV DP2 NRM ] 
Exec Instruction Count : 16777216 
Call Stack Depth : 32 
If Nesting : 64 
Loop Nesting : 64 
Initial Loop Count : 16777216 

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
task(s) (-t, --task)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
# task instructions flops texture fetches size iterations processing time (ms) GInstr/sec GFlop/sec GTexel/sec GPixel/sec GByte/sec 
1: blend single image (MUL) 1 3 1 512 768 10000 493.8084 7.9629 23.8888 7.9629 7.9629 29.6642 
2: blend single image (ADD) 1 3 1 512 768 10000 463.3370 8.4866 25.4598 8.4866 8.4866 31.6151 
3: blend single image (MAD) 1 6 1 512 768 10000 478.8100 8.2124 49.2742 8.2124 8.2124 30.5934 
4: blend multiple images (MUL) 1 3 2 512 768 10000 725.9228 5.4168 16.2503 10.8335 5.4168 20.1791 
5: blend multiple images (ADD) 1 3 2 512 768 10000 713.6882 5.5096 16.5289 11.0193 5.5096 20.5250 
6: blend multiple images (MAD) 1 6 2 512 768 10000 727.3570 5.4061 32.4366 10.8122 5.4061 20.1393 
7: convert to grayscale 1 5 1 512 768 10000 491.0924 8.0070 40.0348 8.0070 8.0070 29.8283 
8: convert to monotone 3 7 1 512 768 10000 478.9241 24.6312 57.4728 8.2104 8.2104 30.5861 
9: convert to sepia 8 32 1 512 768 10000 595.2883 52.8438 211.3751 6.6055 6.6055 24.6073 
10: invert 1 3 1 512 768 10000 494.3102 7.9548 23.8645 7.9548 7.9548 29.6341 
11: halftone 24 51 2 512 768 10000 845.0624 111.6744 237.3081 9.3062 4.6531 17.3341 
12: brightness and contrast 6 19 1 512 768 10000 761.7530 30.9719 98.0778 5.1620 5.1620 19.2299 
13: sharpen 9 27 4 512 768 10000 887.2143 39.8883 119.6648 17.7281 4.4320 16.5106 
14: blur 9 73 5 512 768 10000 1086.2499 32.5795 264.2557 18.0997 3.6199 13.4853 
15: gaussian blur 26 67 9 512 768 10000 1936.2482 52.8012 136.0645 18.2773 2.0308 7.5654 
16: edge detect 34 81 8 512 768 10000 1817.9219 73.5419 175.2028 17.3040 2.1630 8.0578 
17: color gradient 14 35 1 512 768 10000 629.6376 87.4316 218.5791 6.2451 6.2451 23.2649 
18: cel shading 23 70 1 512 768 10000 599.9404 150.7478 458.7975 6.5543 6.5543 24.4165 
19: emboss 18 51 9 512 768 10000 1965.6976 36.0070 102.0198 18.0035 2.0004 7.4520 
20: mandelbrot 60 121 1 512 768 10000 1940.2717 121.5962 245.2189 2.0266 2.0266 7.5497

The results display some useful information about the video card's OGL ICD, drivers, and texture size limits.

__________________
Play emulated games online
Main Rig||Intel Q6600@3.2 ghertz|4x1gb DDR2 1066|Asrock 1600sli 110db LGA 775|EVGA 8800gtx@620/1450/975|2x Seagate 160gb SATA150 Raid0|250 gb Samsung SATA2 HD|Seagate 7000.10 500gb HD|NEC 3520 4x/8x DVD+R/RW DL burner|Antec TP 650 watt|40" Sony Bravia 1080p|20.1" 5ms LCD 1680x1050 Native|Logitec 5.1 Speaker System w/15" Sub|Dual Boot Ubuntu 64bit/Vista 32bit||

SimplyBuyIt - Health&Nutrition

Nucking Futs · April 9th, 2007

Alrighty after fiddling around with overclocking my CPU i've finally found a setting that i will keep. It's not the fastest possible but according to some Guides i've read and my experience so far this seems to be very stable, while running very cool and my CPU Fan makes no noise at all. Seriously i have an External USB Drive which is also very silent and beats that Fan by far.
Long Story short check out my Results

. I'm very satisfied

If you're interested in my Rig you can check out this Thread.

Attached Images

3DMark06.JPG (49.4 KB, 32 views)

__________________

~ whoever calls himself an Existentialist does not understand the true meaning of that word ~

.: Armored Ninja :.
CPU: Core 2 Duo E4300 (@ 3.333 GHz) | Memory: Seitec 1024MB DDR2 RAM (@ 740 MHz)
GPU: Geforce 8800 GTS 320MB (Core Clock: Geometric Domain @ 648 MHz / Shader Domain @ 1512 MHz Memory Clock @ 972 MHz )
Case: Thermaltake Armor VA8000B | Cooler: Scythe Ninja Plus Rev. B | Mobo: GA-965P-DS3 | PSU: Corsair HX620W

inforce · April 9th, 2007

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nucking Futs

Alrighty after fiddling around with overclocking my CPU i've finally found a setting that i will keep. It's not the fastest possible but according to some Guides i've read and my experience so far this seems to be very stable, while running very cool and my CPU Fan makes no noise at all. Seriously i have an External USB Drive which is also very silent and beats that Fan by far.
Long Story short check out my Results

. I'm very satisfied

If you're interested in my Rig you can check out this Thread.

what resolution are you running those tests on in 3dmark?

__________________

Intel Celeron D 3.3ghz // 1.5Gigs ddr2 ram
Biostar Geforce 7600 GS 400/300 - 550/500 overclocked
WindowsXPsp2 // OSx86 // 3626.7kps cable modem
20 inch widescreen LCD // Dual Layer DVDRW
C:\ - 80GB D:\ - 80GB
Owner and Designer of Hazelingerie.com
Star Trek Pwnz!

shadow94553 · April 9th, 2007

The best I could do on 3DMark05 was 3303 3D Marks and a CPU score of 3539. And that's with my cpu and video card oc'd.

Nucking Futs · April 9th, 2007

Quote:

Originally Posted by inforce

what resolution are you running those tests on in 3dmark?

Left everything the way it was. I'll make a new run with all tests enabled.

Edit:
Here's the results from the second run with all Tests included... looks like i made 100 points extra

Edit 2:
Now I've also included my CPUMark 2.1 Shots

Attached Images

	settings.JPG (39.9 KB, 5 views)
	results.JPG (97.8 KB, 13 views)
	CPUMark.JPG (22.6 KB, 4 views)

__________________

~ whoever calls himself an Existentialist does not understand the true meaning of that word ~

.: Armored Ninja :.
CPU: Core 2 Duo E4300 (@ 3.333 GHz) | Memory: Seitec 1024MB DDR2 RAM (@ 740 MHz)
GPU: Geforce 8800 GTS 320MB (Core Clock: Geometric Domain @ 648 MHz / Shader Domain @ 1512 MHz Memory Clock @ 972 MHz )
Case: Thermaltake Armor VA8000B | Cooler: Scythe Ninja Plus Rev. B | Mobo: GA-965P-DS3 | PSU: Corsair HX620W

Last edited by Nucking Futs; April 9th, 2007 at 07:44..

sims · April 9th, 2007

Those score seem to be pretty low. Especially with that overclock and video card.

Here's mine. Full information at Futuremark - ORB - Result Analyzer .

Attached Images

3d06 result.png (28.4 KB, 20 views)

Nucking Futs · April 9th, 2007

You should take into calculation that i had to buy that damn RAM cause there really was no other available. It's a Seitec (no name crap) 1024 200pin 5-6-6-18 (s***s a*s badly i know). But my next buy will be this and this

__________________

~ whoever calls himself an Existentialist does not understand the true meaning of that word ~

.: Armored Ninja :.
CPU: Core 2 Duo E4300 (@ 3.333 GHz) | Memory: Seitec 1024MB DDR2 RAM (@ 740 MHz)
GPU: Geforce 8800 GTS 320MB (Core Clock: Geometric Domain @ 648 MHz / Shader Domain @ 1512 MHz Memory Clock @ 972 MHz )
Case: Thermaltake Armor VA8000B | Cooler: Scythe Ninja Plus Rev. B | Mobo: GA-965P-DS3 | PSU: Corsair HX620W

sims · April 9th, 2007

No your rams are okay. I mean your CPU score beat me by 300 points in the cpu test, which say alot.

For a real satisfaction feeling with your system, check out this thread. The Official Benchmark and Comparison Thread!

Lol that guy bought a cpu that cost as much as our ds3+e4300 combined, overclocked to 3.2ghz and still can't beat a 150 dollar processor. And if I remember correctly, his CPU temperatures are in the 60c. So sad for him.

I was wondering why your 8800gts score so low. I don't believe it's your CPU that's holding you back. I was thinking about buying one of those 320mb 8800 but it doesn't seem to be such an improvement over my 7900gs. I guess I'll wait for the 8600 series.

Nucking Futs · April 9th, 2007

Alright alright. I've overclocked my 8800GTS and did some stresstesting along with a new 3DMark Benchmark.

Attached Images

	gpuoc.JPG (99.6 KB, 16 views)
	gpuocsettings.JPG (15.8 KB, 5 views)
	gpustresstest.JPG (80.3 KB, 11 views)

__________________

~ whoever calls himself an Existentialist does not understand the true meaning of that word ~

.: Armored Ninja :.
CPU: Core 2 Duo E4300 (@ 3.333 GHz) | Memory: Seitec 1024MB DDR2 RAM (@ 740 MHz)
GPU: Geforce 8800 GTS 320MB (Core Clock: Geometric Domain @ 648 MHz / Shader Domain @ 1512 MHz Memory Clock @ 972 MHz )
Case: Thermaltake Armor VA8000B | Cooler: Scythe Ninja Plus Rev. B | Mobo: GA-965P-DS3 | PSU: Corsair HX620W

**fivefeet8** · April 9th, 2007

Quote:

Originally Posted by sims

I was wondering why your 8800gts score so low. I don't believe it's your CPU that's holding you back. I was thinking about buying one of those 320mb 8800 but it doesn't seem to be such an improvement over my 7900gs. I guess I'll wait for the 8600 series.

Basing that opinion on a 3dmark score is naive. A 8800gts 320 meg will clobber your 7900gs in any modern game with higher AF/AA levels.

__________________
Play emulated games online
Main Rig||Intel Q6600@3.2 ghertz|4x1gb DDR2 1066|Asrock 1600sli 110db LGA 775|EVGA 8800gtx@620/1450/975|2x Seagate 160gb SATA150 Raid0|250 gb Samsung SATA2 HD|Seagate 7000.10 500gb HD|NEC 3520 4x/8x DVD+R/RW DL burner|Antec TP 650 watt|40" Sony Bravia 1080p|20.1" 5ms LCD 1680x1050 Native|Logitec 5.1 Speaker System w/15" Sub|Dual Boot Ubuntu 64bit/Vista 32bit||

SimplyBuyIt - Health&Nutrition

skoreanime · April 9th, 2007

Mine @ 3.6Ghz

. Had to blow some cooler air outside into my case to keep temps reasonable (27-29 celsius ambient temps in my computer room

).

Ignore the GPU scores btw

.

sims · April 10th, 2007

Quote:

Originally Posted by fivefeet8

Basing that opinion on a 3dmark score is naive. A 8800gts 320 meg will clobber your 7900gs in any modern game with higher AF/AA levels.

Yes that's true, 3dmark06 means little to real world gaming performance.

My previous 7600gt got 1000-2000 points less than my current 7900gs, but real world gaming saw very little increase with the 7900gs. Probably 20 percent gain.

But, there's no denying the fact that a 8000 points on the 8800gts compared to my 5000points 7900gs is not a very significant increase. As I've personally seen with the case of my 7600gt to 7900gs upgrade.

10000 to 5000 is a different matter however.

Btw, what are you 8800gtx benchmarks?

**fivefeet8** · April 10th, 2007

Quote:

Originally Posted by sims

Yes that's true, 3dmark06 means little to real world gaming performance.

My previous 7600gt got 1000-2000 points less than my current 7900gs, but real world gaming saw very little increase with the 7900gs. Probably 20 percent gain.

But, there's no denying the fact that a 8000 points on the 8800gts compared to my 5000points 7900gs is not a very significant increase. As I've personally seen with the case of my 7600gt to 7900gs upgrade.

10000 to 5000 is a different matter however.

Btw, what are you 8800gtx benchmarks?

3dmark 06's total score is a bit missleading if you're trying to compare GPU's. It gives a ton of points for the CPU score. Also, try benching with higher resolutions + AA/AF and his 8800gts will really start to show it's prowess over your 7900gs.

I find that 3dmark 05 is actually a better benchmark if you're looking for GPU performance as it's score is more from the GPU.

I've gotten about 9000+ pts in 3dmark 06 and about 14000+ pts in 05. But nothing beats playing Oblivion at 1920x1080 16xCSAA/16xAF all sliders max and HDR enabled.

__________________
Play emulated games online
Main Rig||Intel Q6600@3.2 ghertz|4x1gb DDR2 1066|Asrock 1600sli 110db LGA 775|EVGA 8800gtx@620/1450/975|2x Seagate 160gb SATA150 Raid0|250 gb Samsung SATA2 HD|Seagate 7000.10 500gb HD|NEC 3520 4x/8x DVD+R/RW DL burner|Antec TP 650 watt|40" Sony Bravia 1080p|20.1" 5ms LCD 1680x1050 Native|Logitec 5.1 Speaker System w/15" Sub|Dual Boot Ubuntu 64bit/Vista 32bit||

SimplyBuyIt - Health&Nutrition

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

March 5th, 2007	#121 (permalink)
skoreanime Your resident reaper... Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: Canada Posts: 6,031	Yeah yeah, I know. But I won't be the one weeping once my precioussssss's come out . I scored 4600-4700 in 3dMark05 and about 1200-1500 in 06 on my laptop. Just shows how much pain I'm causing my Conroe at the moment by pairing it up with my friends first used PCI-E card...

March 6th, 2007	#122 (permalink)
dashboardy Hardware Enthusiast Join Date: Dec 2006 Location: blah Posts: 808	your x700 kills it that much??? wow. that's a large difference. Anyways that's strange that your score is only 1200-1500 on your laptop. Are those both stock scores (no OC'ing video card?) cause my laptop gets 4700 oc'd in 3dmark05 while it gets about 2000 in 06. I guess I DO have Core 2 and not just core duo...

March 6th, 2007	#123 (permalink)
skoreanime Your resident reaper... Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: Canada Posts: 6,031	The Core 2 Duo (Merom) performs quite a bit better then the Core Duo (Yonah). I can see you scoring higher then me. The point difference sounds about right, Merom performs almost 10% better then Yonah. And yes, x700 does indeed suck. I mean, it barely, and I stress barely, any performance gain over the ATI 9800. I'm serious . The R600's were supposed to be released this week...but instead, they're delayed at least until the next month .

March 8th, 2007	#125 (permalink)
skoreanime Your resident reaper... Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: Canada Posts: 6,031	Yeah, I did OC the GPU quite a bit for the 05 mark. I never touched the CPU though, and I never will. Not such a good idea to mess with it .

March 16th, 2007	#126 (permalink)
inforce myspace.com/inforce Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Cedar City, Utah Posts: 314	Im gonna go do some 3dmarking because I am bored.. lol .. before and after overclocking Ill be back. Alright .. after 4 test these are my results.. 1400 X 900 widescreen for all. Well i saved them but i cant open them for some reason. Maybe i didnt save em right. And i dont feel like going through a half hour of testing again. These are guesses at what they were.. should be close. 1400x900 4xAA 4xAF 2500 1400x900 0xAA 4xAF 3500 1400x900 4xAA 4xAF 3100 overclocked* 1400x900 0xAA 4xAD 6517 overclocked* I don't usually play games at that res, rather 1280x780 or whatever. But the bottom score after overclocking impressed me. During that test, when i was in the "wings of fury game test", I was getting 100-600fps at points LoL. __________________ Intel Celeron D 3.3ghz // 1.5Gigs ddr2 ram Biostar Geforce 7600 GS 400/300 - 550/500 overclocked WindowsXPsp2 // OSx86 // 3626.7kps cable modem 20 inch widescreen LCD // Dual Layer DVDRW C:\ - 80GB D:\ - 80GB Owner and Designer of Hazelingerie.com Star Trek Pwnz! Last edited by inforce; March 16th, 2007 at 01:35.. Reason: Automerged Doublepost

April 9th, 2007	#131 (permalink)
shadow94553 Registered User Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Martinez, CA Posts: 2	The best I could do on 3DMark05 was 3303 3D Marks and a CPU score of 3539. And that's with my cpu and video card oc'd.

April 9th, 2007	#134 (permalink)
Nucking Futs Existentialist Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: Austria Posts: 967	You should take into calculation that i had to buy that damn RAM cause there really was no other available. It's a Seitec (no name crap) 1024 200pin 5-6-6-18 (s**s as badly i know). But my next buy will be this and this __________________ ~ whoever calls himself an Existentialist does not understand the true meaning of that word ~ .: Armored Ninja :. CPU: Core 2 Duo E4300 (@ 3.333 GHz) \| Memory: Seitec 1024MB DDR2 RAM (@ 740 MHz) GPU: Geforce 8800 GTS 320MB (Core Clock: Geometric Domain @ 648 MHz / Shader Domain @ 1512 MHz Memory Clock @ 972 MHz ) Case: Thermaltake Armor VA8000B \| Cooler: Scythe Ninja Plus Rev. B \| Mobo: GA-965P-DS3 \| PSU: Corsair HX620W

April 9th, 2007	#135 (permalink)
sims Banned Join Date: Sep 2004 Location: United States Posts: 576	No your rams are okay. I mean your CPU score beat me by 300 points in the cpu test, which say alot. For a real satisfaction feeling with your system, check out this thread. The Official Benchmark and Comparison Thread! Lol that guy bought a cpu that cost as much as our ds3+e4300 combined, overclocked to 3.2ghz and still can't beat a 150 dollar processor. And if I remember correctly, his CPU temperatures are in the 60c. So sad for him. I was wondering why your 8800gts score so low. I don't believe it's your CPU that's holding you back. I was thinking about buying one of those 320mb 8800 but it doesn't seem to be such an improvement over my 7900gs. I guess I'll wait for the 8600 series.

April 9th, 2007	#138 (permalink)
skoreanime Your resident reaper... Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: Canada Posts: 6,031	Mine @ 3.6Ghz . Had to blow some cooler air outside into my case to keep temps reasonable (27-29 celsius ambient temps in my computer room ). Ignore the GPU scores btw .