Emuforums.com

Go Back   Emuforums.com > General Discussion > Hardware Discussion
About Us Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old December 19th, 2003   #1 (permalink)
Advent yourself
 
Titus03's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: ? (In PAL-area)
Posts: 723
My Slave IDE HD slows down Windows

I have installed a slave HD in my computer and every time I boot up my PC and while Windows is loading, sound gets cracky, mouse runs slowly and also running MP3-file from my slave HD sounds cracky too.

Here's my config:

IDE1 Master: Quantum Fireball 13,2Gb (Drives C, D)
IDE1 Slave: Fujitsu 4,3Gb (Drives E, F)
IDE2 Master: LTN384 40x (Drive G)
IDE2 Slave: HP CD-Writer 8200+ (Drive H)

What should I do?
__________________

- SYSTEM SPECIFICATIONS: ----------------------------------
Intel Core2 Duo E8400 @3.00GHz || ASUS Commando
2GB DDR2 800MHz RAM ||
EVGA GeForce 8800 GTS 512Mb
Corsair 620W 620HX || 3x Seagate 160Gb SATAII HDD
Creative Sound Blaster X-Fi XtremeMusic
Windows XP Professional SP3/Ubuntu 8.04 Hardy Heron
------------------------------------------------------------------
Titus03 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old December 19th, 2003   #2 (permalink)
邪魔ゎ指せない
 
Kane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Gosport, England
Posts: 26,255
Well if your slave drive is PIO rather than UDMA, it'll stress out your CPU.
__________________

>Site Live<
Pop over to my site for help with setting up PSX emulators.
Help for the Final Fantasies and other RPGs avalaible

Celes: (Desktop) Athlon 64 X2 4200+, 2Gb 400MHz DDR Ram, MSI K8N Platinum, GeForce 8800 GTS 320Mb, 500Gb RAID HDD, Vista Business
Erika: (MCPC) Athlon XP 2400+, 1Gb 400MHz DDR Ram, geForce 6800 256Mb, 80Gb Hdd, XP 2005 MCE
Kimiko: (Desktop 2) Athlon 64 3000+, 512Mb 400MHz DDR Ram, Asus K8V, geForce 6800 128Mb

Kane is offline   Reply With Quote
Old December 20th, 2003   #3 (permalink)
Advent yourself
 
Titus03's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: ? (In PAL-area)
Posts: 723
Here are my settings:

----------------PIO-----UDMA-----
IDE1 Master: 4 4
IDE1 Slave: 4 2
IDE2 Master: 4 4
IDE2 Slave: 2 dis.

Anything to change?
__________________

- SYSTEM SPECIFICATIONS: ----------------------------------
Intel Core2 Duo E8400 @3.00GHz || ASUS Commando
2GB DDR2 800MHz RAM ||
EVGA GeForce 8800 GTS 512Mb
Corsair 620W 620HX || 3x Seagate 160Gb SATAII HDD
Creative Sound Blaster X-Fi XtremeMusic
Windows XP Professional SP3/Ubuntu 8.04 Hardy Heron
------------------------------------------------------------------
Titus03 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old December 22nd, 2003   #4 (permalink)
Technology Guru
 
Viperx25's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 285
Thats common. The smaller, older drive is slower so that will happen. I'd recommend leaving the Fujitsu out.
__________________
My System Specs:

Viewsonic E790B 19" Monitor
MSI 865PE Neo2 - FIS2R
P4 3.2Ghz HTT
Thermaltake Spark 7 HSF
2x512mb Kingston HyperX DDR400Mhz
Leadtek A350 TDH Ultra (FX 5900 Ultra)
(480Mhz core, 930Mhz memory)
35GB Maxtor/Quantum Ultra160 SCSI
Sound Blaster Audigy 2 ZS
Antec Performance Plus 660B case
400 Watt PSU
WinXP Pro
Viperx25 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old December 24th, 2003   #5 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 16
IDE spec limitation

If you are trying to use both drives at once, like say, playing music from drive X while windows or whatever is still loading from drive Y then you will notice a large performance hit if both drives are on the same IDE controler. This is because IDE cannot do interleaved read/write commands between 2 different drives. Unfortunatly this is a limitation of the IDE spec and there really isn't anything you can do about it other than switching to SCSI drives.
Fujisanka is offline   Reply With Quote
Old December 24th, 2003   #6 (permalink)
the only one you've ever SEEN
 
hushypushy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 21,837
but at least data transfer between X and Y will be faster than on different chains. that's pretty much your only gain, SCSI owns
__________________
Dedicated to mediocrity and repetition since 1994.

2008 "How Not to Post" guide
hushypushy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 4th, 2004   #7 (permalink)
邪魔ゎ指せない
 
Kane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Gosport, England
Posts: 26,255
I'd suggest putting the Lite-On as slave to Fireball, and the HP slave to the Fujitsu
__________________

>Site Live<
Pop over to my site for help with setting up PSX emulators.
Help for the Final Fantasies and other RPGs avalaible

Celes: (Desktop) Athlon 64 X2 4200+, 2Gb 400MHz DDR Ram, MSI K8N Platinum, GeForce 8800 GTS 320Mb, 500Gb RAID HDD, Vista Business
Erika: (MCPC) Athlon XP 2400+, 1Gb 400MHz DDR Ram, geForce 6800 256Mb, 80Gb Hdd, XP 2005 MCE
Kimiko: (Desktop 2) Athlon 64 3000+, 512Mb 400MHz DDR Ram, Asus K8V, geForce 6800 128Mb

Kane is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT. The time now is 20:30.

© 2006 - 2008 Emu Forums | About Emu Forums | Legal | A member of the Crowdgather Forum Community


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0 Release Candidate 3
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC5