Emuforums.com

Go Back   Emuforums.com > General Discussion > Hardware Discussion
About Us Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old September 14th, 2003   #1 (permalink)
chaosblade
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
nVidia's "DX9" Foulplay ;)

Uhm, nVidia .. Nice try .. but no thanks

http://www.3dchipset.com/#351
  Reply With Quote
Old September 14th, 2003   #2 (permalink)
Banned
 
Andrew Hruska's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: somewhere
Posts: 1,121
We all learned a valuable lesson:

3dfx ownz! Before nvidiot, the master of CHEATING. Wanna Cheat? http://www.nvidia.com

Muhahahaha!
Andrew Hruska is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 14th, 2003   #3 (permalink)
ChrisRay
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Re: nVidia's "DX9" Foulplay ;)

You guys realise Intel also walked out of DX 9.0 specification? Microsoft asked for a whole lot from these vendors. And most specifically Microsoft asked them to hand over there patents to there technology for years in advance.

I can see why Intel and Nvidia did not wish to do this.
  Reply With Quote
Old September 14th, 2003   #4 (permalink)
chaosblade
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Re: nVidia's "DX9" Foulplay ;)

Thats fine . but nVidia doing that and yet whining and complaining that everyone are ATi Biased is just plain annoying and unfit of a company of that size .
  Reply With Quote
Old September 15th, 2003   #5 (permalink)
ChrisRay
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Re: Re: nVidia's

Quote:
Originally Posted by chaosblade
Thats fine . but nVidia doing that and yet whining and complaining that everyone are ATi Biased is just plain annoying and unfit of a company of that size .
I dont think Nvidia has called anyone in paticular ATI biased. It has questioned some shader functions implemented by futuremark.

But they never called Valve bias. Actually a memory sent by Nvidia stated that they had no reason to believe Valve was being biased
  Reply With Quote
Old September 17th, 2003   #6 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 188
a

i think it is those nVidia fanboy whine everyone being bias, not nVidia itself.
elty is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 17th, 2003   #7 (permalink)
Technology Guru
 
Viperx25's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 285
Re: nVidia's "DX9" Foulplay ;)

This is both interesting and dissapointing ;p. I mean, like ChrisRay said, I can understand why Nvidia left the DX9 project. On the other hand, why Nvidia chose to implement DX9 the way it did is a bit puzzleing and dissapointing..
__________________
My System Specs:

Viewsonic E790B 19" Monitor
MSI 865PE Neo2 - FIS2R
P4 3.2Ghz HTT
Thermaltake Spark 7 HSF
2x512mb Kingston HyperX DDR400Mhz
Leadtek A350 TDH Ultra (FX 5900 Ultra)
(480Mhz core, 930Mhz memory)
35GB Maxtor/Quantum Ultra160 SCSI
Sound Blaster Audigy 2 ZS
Antec Performance Plus 660B case
400 Watt PSU
WinXP Pro
Viperx25 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 17th, 2003   #8 (permalink)
band
 
D.D.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: HERE
Posts: 4,575
Re: nVidia's "DX9" Foulplay ;)

Quote:
Originally Posted by warp2search
EIDOS Interactive, the publisher for Tomb Raider:
Angel of Darkness issued a patch a couple of weeks ago for the game which happened to include a way to use the game as a DX9 benchmark. Since it shows NVIDIA hardware performing slower than ATI, EIDOS has pulled it down. Remember, this is a "Way it's meant to be played" game, which means NVIDIA has paid EIDOS marketing money. Keep in mind, that this patch improved performance on both ATI and NVIDIA hardware. Here's a bs statement from EIDOS Europe:
I find this little bit of news rather interesting.

What are your takes on this issue?

PS: Admins, feel free to move this post if you feel it belongs more in "ATi vs Nvidia" than in this thread but I feel it has relevance to both....
__________________


1. Small, Cheap, Powerful - you can have only two
2. Everytime you engineer something foolproof, the world comes up with a better idiot.
3. 「学問とは虚栄である。」




D.D. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 18th, 2003   #9 (permalink)
chaosblade
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Re: nVidia's "DX9" Foulplay ;)

Well they kinda paid for this game's production .. so nVidia can do what ever they want .. but thats still a dirty thing to do to keep from ATi users to run this game in a better manner .
  Reply With Quote
Old September 18th, 2003   #10 (permalink)
邪魔ゎ指せない
 
Kane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Gosport, England
Posts: 26,255
Re: nVidia's "DX9" Foulplay ;)

They'll probs just rerelease the patch without hte benchmark app.
__________________

>Site Live<
Pop over to my site for help with setting up PSX emulators.
Help for the Final Fantasies and other RPGs avalaible

Celes: (Desktop) Athlon 64 X2 4200+, 2Gb 400MHz DDR Ram, MSI K8N Platinum, GeForce 8800 GTS 320Mb, 500Gb RAID HDD, Vista Business
Erika: (MCPC) Athlon XP 2400+, 1Gb 400MHz DDR Ram, geForce 6800 256Mb, 80Gb Hdd, XP 2005 MCE
Kimiko: (Desktop 2) Athlon 64 3000+, 512Mb 400MHz DDR Ram, Asus K8V, geForce 6800 128Mb

Kane is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 19th, 2003   #11 (permalink)
band
 
D.D.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: HERE
Posts: 4,575
Re: nVidia's "DX9" Foulplay ;)

just so nvidia can hide their dx9 incompetence more...sigh
__________________


1. Small, Cheap, Powerful - you can have only two
2. Everytime you engineer something foolproof, the world comes up with a better idiot.
3. 「学問とは虚栄である。」




D.D. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 20th, 2003   #12 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 188
Re: nVidia's "DX9" Foulplay ;)

next patch will probably include unnecessary overhead for ATI cards.
elty is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT. The time now is 20:25.

© 2006 - 2008 Emu Forums | About Emu Forums | Legal | A member of the Crowdgather Forum Community


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0 Release Candidate 3
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC5