Pentium 14 out now!!! - Page 2

chillypacman · September 12th, 2002

Well it loox like no one beleives me but hey thats fine isnt it? we all have diffrent beleifs any ways right? Just another debate between me and the rest of the world no wait! I don't wanto debate over something which isnt going to happen for another lets say 15 years. So lets just leave it in our history files. No how about delete our history files and dispose of the hard drive. now I'm getting sarcastic must of been maths. So many letters on my sheet i thought i was doing english! So anyways unless you wanto continue I'm off for now

Hanamichi · September 12th, 2002

We might believe you if you said there is a 20Ghz chip in development by Intel, but Pentium 14 is just so weird and... no offense, sounds stupid. I mean, using a old name for 14 generations isnt really something a company like Intel would do.

**Demigod** · September 12th, 2002

Quote:

Originally posted by Hanamichi
We might believe you if you said there is a 20Ghz chip in development by Intel, but Pentium 14 is just so weird and... no offense, sounds stupid. I mean, using a old name for 14 generations isnt really something a company like Intel would do.

Although Square would

. They've used the same Final Fantasy name for 10 generations. Kinda strange when you consider the name Final Fantasy. I mean how many Final Fantasies are there?

(I know the origin of the name but it still seems awkward)

__________________
CPU: Intel Core 2 Quad Q9450 @ 2.66 Ghz (Yorkfield) Mobo: Intel DX48BT2 Memory: 2048 MB PC10600 DDR3 Videocard: PNY Geforce 9800 GX2 PCIe w/ 1024 MB GDDR3 Soundcard: On-board SigmaTel High Definition Audio Hard drive: 300 MB Maxtor & 1 TB Hitachi Optical drive: LG GGW-H20L (2x BD-R DL) OS: Microsoft Windows Vista (32-bit)

Nameless · September 12th, 2002

Well, it does sound reasonable that Intel would have better technology that they won't show since what they give now is selling alright for them. Remember when the race between AMD and Intel, in those days Intel released newer technologies much faster than they do now, no?

__________________
--To every problem, there is a solution (other than death, of course

). So, just smile!!.....okay that's a load of crap but you already know that. 3 years and still fighting!!

Systems:
- Modified Mac Mini: 2GHz Core Duo, 2GB RAM, 100GB 7200RPM HD, Dual-Boot Mac & XP
- HP Tablet PC TC1100: 1.1GHz Centrino, 1GB RAM, 60GB 7200RPM HD, Vista Ultimate

**_E_** · September 12th, 2002

well,....why dont you show us the source of your info to back up what you have said?? no offence,.......but this seems crap!!

__________________

-= Moral cowardice that keeps us from speaking our minds is as dangerous to this country as irresponsible talk. The right way is not always =-
the popular and easy way. Standing for right when it is unpopular is a true test of moral character.
Margaret C. Smith

Nameless · September 12th, 2002

If u're talking to me then I asure u that u were sleeping in that time not to notice the race. Only when AMD backed off and Celeron improved did Intel go back to the slow pace again. If u weren't taking to me than...opps

__________________
--To every problem, there is a solution (other than death, of course

). So, just smile!!.....okay that's a load of crap but you already know that. 3 years and still fighting!!

Systems:
- Modified Mac Mini: 2GHz Core Duo, 2GB RAM, 100GB 7200RPM HD, Dual-Boot Mac & XP
- HP Tablet PC TC1100: 1.1GHz Centrino, 1GB RAM, 60GB 7200RPM HD, Vista Ultimate

RF · September 13th, 2002

IIRC the fastes pentium "we know of" is the XEON processor, for business servers etc.

__________________

**Demigod** · September 13th, 2002

The XEON processors are just normal x86 CPUs with a large L2 cache (and sometimes L3 cache as well). They're not clocked any higher and don't have any other features. The P4 XEONs have hyper-threading enabled but we'll get that with the next P4 release (3.06 Ghz).

__________________
CPU: Intel Core 2 Quad Q9450 @ 2.66 Ghz (Yorkfield) Mobo: Intel DX48BT2 Memory: 2048 MB PC10600 DDR3 Videocard: PNY Geforce 9800 GX2 PCIe w/ 1024 MB GDDR3 Soundcard: On-board SigmaTel High Definition Audio Hard drive: 300 MB Maxtor & 1 TB Hitachi Optical drive: LG GGW-H20L (2x BD-R DL) OS: Microsoft Windows Vista (32-bit)

Esturk · September 13th, 2002

Quote:

Originally posted by Demigod79
The XEON processors are just normal x86 CPUs with a large L2 cache (and sometimes L3 cache as well). They're not clocked any higher and don't have any other features. The P4 XEONs have hyper-threading enabled but we'll get that with the next P4 release (3.06 Ghz).

3Ghz.... Most games need less than 1Ghz for optimul performance. I really wanted to buy a GeForce TI4600 today at Electronics Boutique but it was $599 dollars! I don't have that kind of money....

__________________
Necrosaro: Windows XP Pro x64 Edition SP2 | Intel Core 2 Duo E8400 3.00GHz, 1333MHz FSB, 6MB L2 Cache | Asus P5Q Deluxe, Intel P45 Chipset, Socket 775 | 4GB Kingston PC5300 DDR2 | Nvidia GeForce 8800GT, 1024MB | Creative SB X-Fi Fatality Edition | Western Digital Raptor WD1500ADFD, 150Gb, SATA, Western Digital WD5000AAKS, 500GB, SATA | LG 16x DVD-RWx2 SATA.

RF · September 13th, 2002

Now adays i see no problems with lower cpu's, its the vidcards. GTA3 has a recommended 700mhz. Just fine for my toaster, cept the vidcard

__________________

chillypacman · September 13th, 2002

The cpu's arent commercial yet. The world has many deep secrets and this is one of em

chillypacman · September 13th, 2002

Maybe I was kind of asleep for all i know i can't really defend something i don't know much about but i do think that intel has a surprise coming up there sleeves which they may be planning on realeasing.

Hanamichi · September 13th, 2002

It is wrong to leave out the possibility, but if Intel had really named it Pentium14, I have lost all my respect for them

Square... well square shucks when it comes to names

**_E_** · September 13th, 2002

Quote:

Originally posted by Nameless
If u're talking to me then I asure u that u were sleeping in that time not to notice the race. Only when AMD backed off and Celeron improved did Intel go back to the slow pace again. If u weren't taking to me than...opps

oops is the word nameless,...........i was talking to the thread starter!!

__________________

-= Moral cowardice that keeps us from speaking our minds is as dangerous to this country as irresponsible talk. The right way is not always =-
the popular and easy way. Standing for right when it is unpopular is a true test of moral character.
Margaret C. Smith

Nameless · September 13th, 2002

Well, sorry then....my post was stright under urs then though

Anyway, what surprise can Intel have for us other than a new set of instructions for P5 or something??!

__________________
--To every problem, there is a solution (other than death, of course

). So, just smile!!.....okay that's a load of crap but you already know that. 3 years and still fighting!!

Systems:
- Modified Mac Mini: 2GHz Core Duo, 2GB RAM, 100GB 7200RPM HD, Dual-Boot Mac & XP
- HP Tablet PC TC1100: 1.1GHz Centrino, 1GB RAM, 60GB 7200RPM HD, Vista Ultimate

RF · September 13th, 2002

whatever, this has gotten too stupid for my likings.

__________________

chillypacman · September 14th, 2002

Sorry guys i guess i sort of "over did it" on some of you's. Thats cool we can all retire from this thread and pretend nothing ever happend

chillypacman · September 14th, 2002

Quote:

Originally posted by Hanamichi
It is wrong to leave out the possibility, but if Intel had really named it Pentium14, I have lost all my respect for them

Square... well square shucks when it comes to names

No you havent read the whole thread yet! I said earlier thats what the guys who are making the cpu are calling it leave it to the marketing wing to figure out nicer names. They have a cpu coming out called redwood think it was some time next year which was clocked at i think 3.8 ghz at one time!

Player-X · September 14th, 2002

If you want to see 10GHZ a really really rich friend of mine's father has a PC with 5 P4 2GHZ chip and 3 GF4Ti-4600(2PCI 1AGP stacked up)Heat level without industrial grade freezer:150'C

Hanamichi · September 14th, 2002

Why are the guys making cpu's calling it Pentium? They should be calling it P(prototype)-14, Build-21425, X-14 or something more..."proffesional"

Anyhow, DUVL technology has almost come to its limits. If Intel had really made a 10Ghz they've done it with EUVL(which, as known to public, is still in developmeny)

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

September 12th, 2002	#21 (permalink)
chillypacman Banned Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: Australia - Perth Posts: 1,057	Well it loox like no one beleives me but hey thats fine isnt it? we all have diffrent beleifs any ways right? Just another debate between me and the rest of the world no wait! I don't wanto debate over something which isnt going to happen for another lets say 15 years. So lets just leave it in our history files. No how about delete our history files and dispose of the hard drive. now I'm getting sarcastic must of been maths. So many letters on my sheet i thought i was doing english! So anyways unless you wanto continue I'm off for now

September 12th, 2002	#22 (permalink)
Hanamichi Crotally Tazy Join Date: Jun 2001 Location: Malaysia Posts: 4,574	We might believe you if you said there is a 20Ghz chip in development by Intel, but Pentium 14 is just so weird and... no offense, sounds stupid. I mean, using a old name for 14 generations isnt really something a company like Intel would do.

September 12th, 2002	#24 (permalink)
Nameless r u really that bored? :P Join Date: Jan 2002 Location: Saudi Arabia Posts: 1,925	Well, it does sound reasonable that Intel would have better technology that they won't show since what they give now is selling alright for them. Remember when the race between AMD and Intel, in those days Intel released newer technologies much faster than they do now, no? __________________ --To every problem, there is a solution (other than death, of course ). So, just smile!!.....okay that's a load of crap but you already know that. 3 years and still fighting!! Systems: - Modified Mac Mini: 2GHz Core Duo, 2GB RAM, 100GB 7200RPM HD, Dual-Boot Mac & XP - HP Tablet PC TC1100: 1.1GHz Centrino, 1GB RAM, 60GB 7200RPM HD, Vista Ultimate

September 12th, 2002	#25 (permalink)
_E_ Lurking Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: somewhere Posts: 8,918	well,....why dont you show us the source of your info to back up what you have said?? no offence,.......but this seems crap!! __________________ -= Moral cowardice that keeps us from speaking our minds is as dangerous to this country as irresponsible talk. The right way is not always =- the popular and easy way. Standing for right when it is unpopular is a true test of moral character. Margaret C. Smith

September 12th, 2002	#26 (permalink)
Nameless r u really that bored? :P Join Date: Jan 2002 Location: Saudi Arabia Posts: 1,925	If u're talking to me then I asure u that u were sleeping in that time not to notice the race. Only when AMD backed off and Celeron improved did Intel go back to the slow pace again. If u weren't taking to me than...opps __________________ --To every problem, there is a solution (other than death, of course ). So, just smile!!.....okay that's a load of crap but you already know that. 3 years and still fighting!! Systems: - Modified Mac Mini: 2GHz Core Duo, 2GB RAM, 100GB 7200RPM HD, Dual-Boot Mac & XP - HP Tablet PC TC1100: 1.1GHz Centrino, 1GB RAM, 60GB 7200RPM HD, Vista Ultimate

September 13th, 2002	#27 (permalink)
RF Canadian Spaceman Join Date: May 2002 Location: Canada Posts: 8,642	IIRC the fastes pentium "we know of" is the XEON processor, for business servers etc. __________________

September 13th, 2002	#28 (permalink)
Demigod これはバタスです Join Date: Jun 2001 Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada Posts: 5,814	The XEON processors are just normal x86 CPUs with a large L2 cache (and sometimes L3 cache as well). They're not clocked any higher and don't have any other features. The P4 XEONs have hyper-threading enabled but we'll get that with the next P4 release (3.06 Ghz). __________________ CPU: Intel Core 2 Quad Q9450 @ 2.66 Ghz (Yorkfield) Mobo: Intel DX48BT2 Memory: 2048 MB PC10600 DDR3 Videocard: PNY Geforce 9800 GX2 PCIe w/ 1024 MB GDDR3 Soundcard: On-board SigmaTel High Definition Audio Hard drive: 300 MB Maxtor & 1 TB Hitachi Optical drive: LG GGW-H20L (2x BD-R DL) OS: Microsoft Windows Vista (32-bit)

September 13th, 2002	#30 (permalink)
RF Canadian Spaceman Join Date: May 2002 Location: Canada Posts: 8,642	Now adays i see no problems with lower cpu's, its the vidcards. GTA3 has a recommended 700mhz. Just fine for my toaster, cept the vidcard __________________

September 13th, 2002	#31 (permalink)
chillypacman Banned Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: Australia - Perth Posts: 1,057	The cpu's arent commercial yet. The world has many deep secrets and this is one of em

September 13th, 2002	#32 (permalink)
chillypacman Banned Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: Australia - Perth Posts: 1,057	Maybe I was kind of asleep for all i know i can't really defend something i don't know much about but i do think that intel has a surprise coming up there sleeves which they may be planning on realeasing.

September 13th, 2002	#33 (permalink)
Hanamichi Crotally Tazy Join Date: Jun 2001 Location: Malaysia Posts: 4,574	It is wrong to leave out the possibility, but if Intel had really named it Pentium14, I have lost all my respect for them Square... well square shucks when it comes to names

September 13th, 2002	#35 (permalink)
Nameless r u really that bored? :P Join Date: Jan 2002 Location: Saudi Arabia Posts: 1,925	Well, sorry then....my post was stright under urs then though Anyway, what surprise can Intel have for us other than a new set of instructions for P5 or something??! __________________ --To every problem, there is a solution (other than death, of course ). So, just smile!!.....okay that's a load of crap but you already know that. 3 years and still fighting!! Systems: - Modified Mac Mini: 2GHz Core Duo, 2GB RAM, 100GB 7200RPM HD, Dual-Boot Mac & XP - HP Tablet PC TC1100: 1.1GHz Centrino, 1GB RAM, 60GB 7200RPM HD, Vista Ultimate

September 13th, 2002	#36 (permalink)
RF Canadian Spaceman Join Date: May 2002 Location: Canada Posts: 8,642	whatever, this has gotten too stupid for my likings. __________________

September 14th, 2002	#37 (permalink)
chillypacman Banned Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: Australia - Perth Posts: 1,057	Sorry guys i guess i sort of "over did it" on some of you's. Thats cool we can all retire from this thread and pretend nothing ever happend

September 14th, 2002	#39 (permalink)
Player-X Banned Join Date: Apr 2002 Location: From Kuching in Malaysia now stuck in Houston Texas Posts: 9,115	If you want to see 10GHZ a really really rich friend of mine's father has a PC with 5 P4 2GHZ chip and 3 GF4Ti-4600(2PCI 1AGP stacked up)Heat level without industrial grade freezer:150'C

September 14th, 2002	#40 (permalink)
Hanamichi Crotally Tazy Join Date: Jun 2001 Location: Malaysia Posts: 4,574	Why are the guys making cpu's calling it Pentium? They should be calling it P(prototype)-14, Build-21425, X-14 or something more..."proffesional" Anyhow, DUVL technology has almost come to its limits. If Intel had really made a 10Ghz they've done it with EUVL(which, as known to public, is still in developmeny)