|
|
|||||||
| About Us | Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
:3
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Seoul, South Korea
Posts: 10,116
|
It's the best PCI card on the market afaik. A voodoo 5 is better, but then again you'd be relying on homebrew drivers for it, and it's still a bit over a hundred bucks.
So i say, go for it. A bit on the expensive side assuming it's only an MX, but it's better than a voodoo3 IMHO.
__________________
"...And when I finally meet you again, I want to ask you - have you found what you were looking for? Because that's what I felt you were doing, all these years. And I want to hear you answer, "Yes, I have, thank you for asking," and we'll be together again, until the end of our days..." |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
CoLD InSiDE
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Somewhere
Posts: 2,613
|
With Geforce 2 you would be able to play new games at some good speed and quality compared to your V3. Looking at your budget I think this would be a good choice.
Ali
__________________
AMD Athlon XP 2100 @ 1.75 Ghz Gigabyte GA-7VA.XP VIA K400 1.25GB PC3200 System Ram ChainTech GeForCe4 TI 4200 128MB Creative SB Live! 5.1 2x WD Caviar 120GBs and -Rom1 Maxtor 40GB LiteON 16x DVD-Rw WindowsXP Professional-SP2 & Mandrake Linux |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) |
|
Must Watch Family Guy
![]() ![]() Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: On top of a big hill
Posts: 182
|
I'd go with a Geforce unless you want to wait for the Radeon 9700 and have the $300+ to buy it.
__________________
Pentium 4 2.6, 2 Gig Corsair Dual Channel DDR400, Intel 875PBZ, Sapphire Radeon 9800 Pro, Soundblaster Audigy2, 200 GB Seagate 8 MB buffer Pelxtor PX-755SA DVD-R/RW, Aluminum-Black Raidmax Scorpio ATX PC Case w/ 420 Watt P4/AMD Dual FanPower Supply, Samsung SyncMaster 957MB Win Vista SP 1
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) | |
|
CoLD InSiDE
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Somewhere
Posts: 2,613
|
Quote:
Ali
__________________
AMD Athlon XP 2100 @ 1.75 Ghz Gigabyte GA-7VA.XP VIA K400 1.25GB PC3200 System Ram ChainTech GeForCe4 TI 4200 128MB Creative SB Live! 5.1 2x WD Caviar 120GBs and -Rom1 Maxtor 40GB LiteON 16x DVD-Rw WindowsXP Professional-SP2 & Mandrake Linux |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) |
|
¡¾¡¾¡¾¡ Fantasy ¡¾¡¾¡¾¡
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Manila, Philippines
Posts: 3,649
|
how much did you spend on it?
you should have bought a g3 ti 200 at least... well g4 is alot more better than v3... i think thats better than the old one...
__________________
FoR PiNoYs WhO WanTs To BuY CheAp ParTs CliCk Here also Here Processor - Intel Quad 2 Quad q6600 G0 Stepping [Stock Settings] Memory - 2GB Team Elite 800mhz Graphics Card - Palit Daytone Geforce 8800 GT 512 MB Mobo - Abit IP-35-E OS - Dual Boot Windows XP Professional SP3 and Ubuntu Linux Pad - PS1 and PS2 > USB Adapter 3DMark05 Score - 35082 |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 (permalink) |
|
The ChinaDude!!!
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: In my room, with my computer. hey, i saw at another forum that you could dump a lot of info here. Can i do that here too? Yes, i see i can do that. LOL, i love this, how much can i talk more here? STILL MORE? Oh this is so much fun but here it ends.
Posts: 3,917
|
in price/speed comparison i think ati has got the advantage over nvidia..... the r2 was designed as competitor for the gf3 and still it can keep up with a gf4ti4200 (not the rest)
and gf4mx are worse than gf3. that's all i know.
__________________
"Always fighting for your believes..." "...With fighting, my belief began" --------------------------------- "Like... WTF are you doing with that chair?" "What does it look like, of course i'm going to use it to fly!" My homepage where my drawings are for ur pleasure! really really NOT updated |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 (permalink) | |
|
A Wandering Cow
![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: {::::>
Posts: 415
|
Quote:
![]() dunno how it compares to radeon pci's though |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 (permalink) |
|
これはバタスです
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 5,811
|
I think the Radeon 7500 PCI is the closest thing to a GF4 MX PCI. It performs on par with a GeForce 2 Ti.
__________________
CPU: Intel Core 2 Quad Q9450 @ 2.66 Ghz (Yorkfield) Mobo: Intel DX48BT2 Memory: 2048 MB PC10600 DDR3 Videocard: PNY Geforce 9800 GX2 PCIe w/ 1024 MB GDDR3 Soundcard: On-board SigmaTel High Definition Audio Hard drive: 300 MB Maxtor & 1 TB Hitachi Optical drive: LG GGW-H20L (2x BD-R DL) OS: Microsoft Windows Vista (32-bit) |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 (permalink) |
|
¡¾¡¾¡¾¡ Fantasy ¡¾¡¾¡¾¡
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Manila, Philippines
Posts: 3,649
|
you mean that g4 mx runs just like mine?
__________________
FoR PiNoYs WhO WanTs To BuY CheAp ParTs CliCk Here also Here Processor - Intel Quad 2 Quad q6600 G0 Stepping [Stock Settings] Memory - 2GB Team Elite 800mhz Graphics Card - Palit Daytone Geforce 8800 GT 512 MB Mobo - Abit IP-35-E OS - Dual Boot Windows XP Professional SP3 and Ubuntu Linux Pad - PS1 and PS2 > USB Adapter 3DMark05 Score - 35082 |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 (permalink) |
|
¡¾¡¾¡¾¡ Fantasy ¡¾¡¾¡¾¡
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Manila, Philippines
Posts: 3,649
|
not actually geforce 4 has some features that g2 dosent ave... although some cards are still faster than g4 mx
__________________
FoR PiNoYs WhO WanTs To BuY CheAp ParTs CliCk Here also Here Processor - Intel Quad 2 Quad q6600 G0 Stepping [Stock Settings] Memory - 2GB Team Elite 800mhz Graphics Card - Palit Daytone Geforce 8800 GT 512 MB Mobo - Abit IP-35-E OS - Dual Boot Windows XP Professional SP3 and Ubuntu Linux Pad - PS1 and PS2 > USB Adapter 3DMark05 Score - 35082 |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 (permalink) |
|
これはバタスです
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 5,811
|
The GeForce 4 MX 420 performs slightly faster than a GeForce 2 MX 400 so he didn't really get a slower card than what he wanted to get.
__________________
CPU: Intel Core 2 Quad Q9450 @ 2.66 Ghz (Yorkfield) Mobo: Intel DX48BT2 Memory: 2048 MB PC10600 DDR3 Videocard: PNY Geforce 9800 GX2 PCIe w/ 1024 MB GDDR3 Soundcard: On-board SigmaTel High Definition Audio Hard drive: 300 MB Maxtor & 1 TB Hitachi Optical drive: LG GGW-H20L (2x BD-R DL) OS: Microsoft Windows Vista (32-bit) |
|
|
|
|
|
#19 (permalink) |
|
>_<
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: East Coast, USA
Posts: 924
|
the geforce 4 mx is like a higher clocked geforce 2. The major difference is LMA II (light speed memory architecure) that has 4 (i think) memory controllers grabbing data from the video memory (geforce 2 has one memory controller) thus making it more efficent than a geforce 2 and a bit faster (geforce 3 still better).
__________________
>_< |
|
|
|
|
|
#20 (permalink) |
|
Ebichu!
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Tampa Bay, Florida
Posts: 2,089
|
I think i810 & SiS users should have a look at this tread, a geforce 4MX PCI is definately a good buy if your looking for a card to upgrade and you don't have AGP slots :thumbup: at least it's faster & has more memory than a Geforce 2 GTS
not bad eh?
__________________
...no sig for now
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|