|
|
|||||||
| About Us | Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Mark Forums Read |
| View Poll Results: ATI Rage 128 gl 16mb or the Nvidia TNT2 M64 (16mb) | |||
| ATI Rage 128 gl 16mb |
|
3 | 30.00% |
| Nvidia TNT2 M64 (16mb) |
|
7 | 70.00% |
| Voters: 10. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Ghost Hacker
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Apr 2001
Posts: 1,830
|
Re: Which card would you say is better...
I always thought the TNT2 64 had 64Mb, but I guess that doesn't make sense because my TNT2 ultra has 32Mb.
I guess my vote is for the TNT2, but I have no idea what the other card is like so I'm not really voting. Last edited by Adair; April 16th, 2001 at 08:37. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) |
|
sakabatou_x
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: TEXAS (everything's bigger)
Posts: 1,256
|
Re: Which card would you say is better...
thanks for the responses guys. the tnt2 m64 was the one i put in, but i just wanted to be sure. thanx again.
__________________
andré:.thrasher10:.sakabatou_x:. emulator:epsxe:.os:xp_pro:.processor:amd_athlonxp_3000+:.mobo:epox_8rda3+:. gfx_card:radeon9800pro_256mb_ddr:.ram:1.5gb_ddr:.pad:super_dual_box_2p_usb_adapter:. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
![]() ![]() Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: jordan
Posts: 171
|
Re: Which card would you say is better...
if you want my opinion the ati rage 128 is a 128 bit card (processor is 128 bits of band width but the tnt2 is 64 bit width so i think that the ati must be more powerful than the tnt2 at least a little bit .
__________________
every one on this world deserves happines. but not when it will be taken from others. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Blue Island
Posts: 345
|
Re: Which card would you say is better...
i have the ati rage 128 but with 32 Mb of ram
It runs just fine although if i had the money, i would have gotten a geforce2 or some other high end card. I have never seen a tnt2 64 running so i have no comparison although since you have both, the best way to find out is to test them both and see wich one runs better
__________________
"You seem a decent fellow. I'd hate to kill you" |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) |
|
Emu author
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: England
Posts: 1,062
|
Re: Which card would you say is better...
Why dont you benchmark your system with both cards (one at a time) with 3dMark2000? This will give you a performance benchmark and you can also see the picture quality of each as compared to a reference image.
__________________
http://simonmallion.homedns.org/PSXMemTool |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Finland
Posts: 356
|
Re: Which card would you say is better...
Yeah that's a good idea... try using Matrox-G100 (4Mb) with the 2000 version...
aaaah! nice transpatterny! nice speed! AAAAARRRRGGHH!
__________________
Send something to this guy: NateMan900@aol.com ...perkele! |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|