Emuforums.com

Go Back   Emuforums.com > General Discussion > Hardware Discussion
Home Register Downloads FAQ Members List Calendar Arcade Mark Forums Read


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old September 16th, 2009   #1 (permalink)
Resident Rabble Rouser
 
crhylove's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: San Diego
Posts: 122
AMD Answers Back...

AMD pops out sub-$100 quad-core Athlon II X4 CPU: review roundup

Has a nice set of info on it. So my next question:

How will Dolphin performance be on one of these?
__________________
Drifting along, floating down a freeway, at night....
http://myspace.com/khanz
crhylove is offline   Reply With Quote

Advertisement [Remove Advertisement]
Old September 16th, 2009   #2 (permalink)
No sir. I don't like it.
 
masta.g.86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Alabama
Posts: 2,456
The same as an Athlon II X2 clocked at the same speed. :/
__________________
Quote:
The truth is there for those who choose to see it.
Phenom II X4 @ 3.6GHz | 4GB OCZ Dominator DDR3 @ 1600MHz
Sapphire Vapor-X Radeon HD4850 | Samsung TOC 24" 1920x1200
Auzentech X-Fi Forte 7.1 | Klipsch Promedia 5.1 THX
LG H20L BD-RE | WD Caviar Black 1TB 7200RPM
GIGABYTE GA-MA790FXT-UD5P | Windows 7 x64 Ultimate

Join the NGEmu Folding@Home Team! Info
Download the standard client here OR preferably download the GPU or SMP client here.
Set your team ID to: 161326
NGEmu Stats Page: Here
masta.g.86 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 16th, 2009   #3 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Lord Zedeck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Cleveland, Ohio
Posts: 1,806
I only read the summary of it, but it lacks L3 cache? Yuck. Since the L3 cache on those CPUs is essentially their version of L2 cache (since their L2 cache is so small), you can sort of consider this a Celeron, or Sempron, of sorts. If the summary says performance in gaming is a down point, that will at least give a clue on it's raw performance for emulators like PCSX2 and Dolphin.
__________________

"Without forgiveness, life is governed by an endless cycle of resentment and retaliation."
"Judge people not of their mistakes, but on how they handle those mistakes."


Core 2 Duo E8600 @4.0GHz- ASUS Maximus Formula (Rampage Formula BIOS 0701) - 8GB (4x 2GB) Corsair XMS2 DDR2 800
MSI nVidia GeForce 8800GT 512MB - 4x Western Digital Caviar 6400AAKS (2,560GB total) - PC Power & Cooling Silencer 610
IBM P275 21" CRT (1600x1200 @100Hz) - Logitech Z-2300 2.1 Sound System - Windows 7 64-bit & Windows XP SP3
Lord Zedeck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 16th, 2009   #4 (permalink)
No sir. I don't like it.
 
masta.g.86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Alabama
Posts: 2,456
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lord Zedeck View Post
Since the L3 cache on those CPUs is essentially their version of L2 cache (since their L2 cache is so small), you can sort of consider this a Celeron, or Sempron, of sorts.
Pretty much. Some motherboards can attempt to unlock the CPU's L3 cache. If successful, performance to very close to that of a Phenom II at the same clock speed.
__________________
Quote:
The truth is there for those who choose to see it.
Phenom II X4 @ 3.6GHz | 4GB OCZ Dominator DDR3 @ 1600MHz
Sapphire Vapor-X Radeon HD4850 | Samsung TOC 24" 1920x1200
Auzentech X-Fi Forte 7.1 | Klipsch Promedia 5.1 THX
LG H20L BD-RE | WD Caviar Black 1TB 7200RPM
GIGABYTE GA-MA790FXT-UD5P | Windows 7 x64 Ultimate

Join the NGEmu Folding@Home Team! Info
Download the standard client here OR preferably download the GPU or SMP client here.
Set your team ID to: 161326
NGEmu Stats Page: Here
masta.g.86 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 16th, 2009   #5 (permalink)
:|
 
nanaya's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Dipokusumo
Posts: 576
Apparently AMD admits that some Athlon II X4 are natively non-L3-Propus and some are just L3-disabled-Deneb, so the chance are a little lower than the unlock cores things, AMD confirms Deneb core in some Athlon IIs.

Still, this things has serious values based on some benchmark I saw.
nanaya is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 16th, 2009   #6 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Posts: 47
On the other hand traditional quad-core applications like video encoding perform exceptional well on the athlon II X4.
wlee15 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 17th, 2009   #7 (permalink)
Behind ur girlfriend :D
 
Squall-Leonhart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 18,883
don't count it entirely out of the running........

AnandTech: AMD Athlon II X4 620 & 630: The First $99 Quad Core CPU
__________________


VBA-M | Xtemu | NGOHQ | Post Impact Productions | TNHW | XBCD 0.2.6 | Satanic666's Emulator Compiles
Don't be a NOOB, READ THE NGEmu/EmuForums Rules of Conduct
Need Help with ePSXe? This is your first stop!.

If you don't post all the required information, you don't get help.
Everytime someone posts a romsite, God kills a beautiful woman.
Squall-Leonhart is online now   Reply With Quote
Old September 18th, 2009   #8 (permalink)
Resident Rabble Rouser
 
crhylove's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: San Diego
Posts: 122
You are right!

You are right about having no L3 cache making it weak....

Several of the articles pointed out that an equitably priced Phenom II x3 would be a better performer in almost all scenarios!

rHY
__________________
Drifting along, floating down a freeway, at night....
http://myspace.com/khanz
crhylove is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 18th, 2009   #9 (permalink)
I tell you what.
 
BigIg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Ohio, USA
Posts: 2,273
Still, it'll pull in the uneducated market.
__________________
Arrogance and ignorance go hand in hand
BigIg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 18th, 2009   #10 (permalink)
Die anime!! Die!!
 
gamefreak94's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: پاكستان <--- Urdu
Posts: 6,271
Aww...come on! It's an excellent budget $100 chip, and a quad-core none the less! If you aren't willing to pump out anymore then that much for a CPU then I don't think you stand in much of a position to complain about its smaller L3 cache or lower performance compared to other quad-cores (again, you have to keep in mind that other quad-cores are much more pricier).

In short, you're getting what you paid for If you want performance in emulators, then go buy an AthlonII X2/PhenomII X2.

Last edited by gamefreak94; September 18th, 2009 at 14:28..
gamefreak94 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 18th, 2009   #11 (permalink)
Human Metal
 
Cid Highwind's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Holland / Hungary
Posts: 13,541
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigIg View Post
Still, it'll pull in the uneducated market.
Seems like a nice competitor for the Q8200, though that one can be OC'd to 2.8GHz easily so it steps away from it. I wonder how these OC.
__________________

PC Specs:
CPU: Intel Q8200 @ 2.8GHz
GPU: Sapphire ATi HD4870 / 1024MB / Core: 801 / Mem: 1000
Mobo: Gigabyte EP35-DS3 (rev 2.1)
SPU: Creative X-Fi Xtreme Music
RAM: 2GB Kingston HyperX DDR2 1066 @ 4-4-4-12 ~ 800MHz
HDD: 1TB Samsung Spinpoint, 32MB
PSU: Hiper Type-R 580W
Monitor: Iiyama B2403WS / 1920*1200

Geometry Wars: 198.400
Lumines: 999.999

Join the NGEmu Folding @ Home community NOW!
Cid Highwind is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 18th, 2009   #12 (permalink)
Registered User
 
StriderVM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Philippines
Posts: 2,059
If the application can use the all the cores, it's great. If it's not. No, it's not much different from a normal Athlon X2 7000 series on the same clock speed. The processor can go to about 3.2Ghz probably on air. So on that regard, it's still a good competitor to the Q8200. Especially if it can keep up with the lower price than the Q8200.
__________________
Current PC specs :
AsRock 945GCM-S
Pentium Dual Core E5200 @ 2912Mhz (233x12.5)
Palit Radeon 4850 Sonic 512MB gDDR3
2x2048MB Kingston DDR2 800Mhz RAM

Last edited by StriderVM; September 18th, 2009 at 14:39..
StriderVM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 18th, 2009   #13 (permalink)
she's my cherry pie
 
LoneWolf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Why do you want to know ?
Posts: 1,255
lol dude these are 45nm. 3.8 ghz is probably the limit on air.
LoneWolf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 18th, 2009   #14 (permalink)
:|
 
nanaya's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Dipokusumo
Posts: 576
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cid Highwind View Post
Seems like a nice competitor for the Q8200, though that one can be OC'd to 2.8GHz easily so it steps away from it. I wonder how these OC.
According here AnandTech: AMD Athlon II X4 620 & 630: The First $99 Quad Core CPU
Quote:
As I mentioned at the start of this article I managed to hit 3.25GHz on the Athlon II X4 620 without any additional voltage using the retail AMD cooler:
So yes, if you factor overclocking it currently destroy Intel lower end quad core for price/performance and even more so if you don't.
nanaya is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 18th, 2009   #15 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Lord Zedeck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Cleveland, Ohio
Posts: 1,806
Quote:
Originally Posted by LoneWolf View Post
lol dude these are 45nm. 3.8 ghz is probably the limit on air.
No. Check this.
Quote:
I could hit 260MHz x 13.0 for 3.38GHz by upping the voltage, but the gain wasn't worth the additional power usage. Anything higher wasn't possible without more exotic cooling or much more voltage.
The last part is the key. I'm not sure how voltage goes with AMD, but with Intel, 1.4V is about the considered limit for 45nm. They're already there with just 3.25GHz (I'm running 4.0GHz right now with 1.23V). Now I know it may be, or should I say I'm pretty sure it is, a bit different with AMD than it is with Intel, but I'm sure the limits aren't too far apart, and since it's different, you can't assume it'll get to near 4GHz just because Intel does. A Core 2 is a much different 45nm chip than a Athlon II is.
__________________

"Without forgiveness, life is governed by an endless cycle of resentment and retaliation."
"Judge people not of their mistakes, but on how they handle those mistakes."


Core 2 Duo E8600 @4.0GHz- ASUS Maximus Formula (Rampage Formula BIOS 0701) - 8GB (4x 2GB) Corsair XMS2 DDR2 800
MSI nVidia GeForce 8800GT 512MB - 4x Western Digital Caviar 6400AAKS (2,560GB total) - PC Power & Cooling Silencer 610
IBM P275 21" CRT (1600x1200 @100Hz) - Logitech Z-2300 2.1 Sound System - Windows 7 64-bit & Windows XP SP3
Lord Zedeck is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT. The time now is 20:08.

© 2006 - 2008 Emu Forums | About Emu Forums | Legal | A member of the Crowdgather Forum Community


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC5