|
|
Search
|
|||||||
| Home | Register | Downloads | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Arcade | Mark Forums Read |
» Less advertising throughout
» Post and participate in discussions
» Network with other forum members
» Free private messaging
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
![]() ![]() Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Cambodia
Posts: 137
|
NVIDIA seems very unhappy with Intel, not only showed us upgrading CPU is useless and even hinted Intel’s upcoming graphic solution Larrabee will be a vaporware: “Larabee is a PowerPoint slide,I haven’t met a product on my PowerPoint slide that I don’t like. You know, they’re floating Larrabee out there just to put a shadow over us, cast a cloud over us. They’ve already slipped it two years from the time they talked about. They would love to slip it another four years and leave a cloud over me.” (NVIDIA CEO Jen-Hsun Huang, CNET interview) Intel: upgrade GPU have no benefit to users - Expreview.com Nvidia CEO details his beef with Intel | Nanotech: The Circuits Blog - CNET News.com
__________________
CPU Intel IV 3.2Ghz Display Card Geforce 5200 FX RAM 512MB HDD 120GB |
|
|
|
| Advertisement | [Remove Advertisement] | ||
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Ohio
Posts: 2,051
|
Intel's just being greedy and wants people to stop buying hardware that's in a market they don't dominate, so they downplay other hardware and/or merge that hardware into their own (CPU/GPU CPU combinations they have planned). Either that, or they can't stand being the social laughingstock of the GPU market when it comes to performance of their IGPs (though they do outsell nVidia and AMD/ATi when it comes to number of units moved). Why doesn't Intel get off it's butt and just make some powerful dedicated GPUs then instead of spreading propaganda? With the AMD/ATi troubles, it sure would be interesting, at the very least, with another competitor. Sure, for most people, a dedicated GPU would be near, if not, useless, but considering GPUs are mostly meant for gaming, and they left that out of the equation, they're being ridiculous.
__________________
![]() "Without forgiveness, life is governed by an endless cycle of resentment and retaliation." "Judge people not of their mistakes, but on how they handle those mistakes." Core 2 Duo E8600 @4.0GHz - ASUS Maximus Formula (Rampage Formula BIOS 0701) - 8GB (4x 2GB) Corsair XMS2 DDR2 800
MSI nVidia GeForce 8800GT 512MB - 4x Western Digital Caviar 6400AAKS (2,560GB total) - PC Power & Cooling Silencer 610 IBM P275 21" CRT (1600x1200 @100Hz) - Logitech Z-2300 2.1 Sound System - Windows 7 64-bit & Windows XP SP3 |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) | |
|
Heroes Might& Magic Champ
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Utterly destroying the soul of Gladiator@ with my box of tasty Cheesy Puff potato chips
Posts: 4,629
|
Seeing as its happening everywhere in the software industry, I wonder if intel has the power and money to do a hostile takeover attempt on Nvidia? (disregrading anti monopoly laws potentially interfering of course). That would be a scary day.
__________________
Quote:
Last edited by PCXL-Fan; May 26th, 2008 at 06:47.. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
Final Fantasy XXX
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: USA, TX
Posts: 2,405
|
Intel's is rich and powerful in all aspects compared to Nvidia. Answer this question--who's the number one gpu selling worldwide? ![]() ![]() Statistics from 1st quarter of 2008
__________________
Intel Core2Duo E6300 1.86Ghz L629A244 @ 3.78GHz G.Skill 2x1gb Hz--540MHzAsus P5K-E Wifi/AP Rev.1.02g Thermalright Ultra Extreme 120+ FM121 (110 cfm fan) ATI x1900 GT Rev.2 256mb 513/657 CORSAIR CMPSU-1000HX 1000W |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) | |
|
Heroes Might& Magic Champ
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Utterly destroying the soul of Gladiator@ with my box of tasty Cheesy Puff potato chips
Posts: 4,629
|
Wow according to those stats Nvidia had a 5.5% drop in market share between 4thQtr 2007 to 1st qtr 2008 which basically means ~15% drop in sales. I wonder what could have caused that? The downturn in the economy? Cuz this is the time Nvidia released its killer G92 cards, so you think with cards like that they'd be at least remaining about the same or even take some from ATI. Especially with ATI's less than stellar performance in the highend market. Oh, wait thats right I forgot, the highend market only makes up a fraction of the market and cards they sell, and while card for card they make less profit on the lower end and integrated gpus they make up for it in far larger volume. I was thinking it might be from ATI or intel taking away some of the lower end laptop market.
__________________
Quote:
Last edited by PCXL-Fan; May 26th, 2008 at 07:45.. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) |
|
Your resident reaper...
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Canada
Posts: 6,031
|
Don't think too many people even went for the 9xxx series of GPUs Nvidias released. A lot of people with the 8xxx series seem to be waiting for Nvidias next line up, the GT200. And I'm not surprised Intels leading the GPU sector in terms of sales...every school/college/university I've been to, all the computer labs are running onboard Intel GPUs. Not to mention it's the same thing for notebooks as well.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) | |
|
&-)---|--<
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Smallville
Posts: 7,715
|
Quote:
Both AMD and Nvidia has more than proven they can make incredibly powerful GPU's. Now it's Intels turn to prove it can do the same, but talk is cheap.
__________________
Play emulated games online Main Rig||Intel Q6600@3.2 ghertz|4x1gb DDR2 1066|Asrock 1600sli 110db LGA 775|EVGA 8800gtx@620/1450/975|8800GT Physics|2x Seagate 160gb SATA150 Raid0|250 gb Samsung SATA2 HD|Seagate 7000.10 500gb HD|NEC 3520 4x/8x DVD+R/RW DL burner|Antec TP 650 watt|40" Sony Bravia 1080p|20.1" 5ms LCD 1680x1050 Native|Logitec 5.1 Speaker System w/15" Sub|Windows 7 64bit Ultimate|| SimplyBuyIt - Health&Nutrition |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) | |
|
Extreme Mobility
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Santa Cruz, CA
Posts: 6,286
|
Quote:
![]() The real problem here is that the lot of us just disregard Intel's integrated graphics solution, since they are not "high-end" enough. I remember some GMA 950 and X3000/X3100 benchmarks, and then... the benchmarks for Intel's GPUs stopped. Not one thing had been mentioned since then. And while I appreciate the high-end feel of greater cards, I have no choice but to mark Intel's GMA X3500 as being a candidate for an official PCSX2 hardware certificate. And if you ask me, that means... ASUS P5E-VM HDMI motherboard with any Wolfdale or Yorkfield processor is a cheap, quick, dirty, but effective upgrade for anyone who wants: - An HTPC. - A light gaming machine for anything up to Half Life 2 at mid settings. - PCSX2 Now there's something to look forward to. Of course it still doesn't feel as nice with the X3500 as it is with the HD 3200 in the 780G chipset in AMD's motherboards, but this is a great start. It's actually not that weak. Just a bit short of HD 3200, I guess. I am curious to know what exactly Intel did to the X3500 GPU to make it such a drastic improvement in terms of performance. It really beat a 7300GT.
__________________
cChip interpreter WIP - current status: Release Candidate LRx Filter RC - current performance rating: 9/10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) | |
|
&-)---|--<
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Smallville
Posts: 7,715
|
Quote:
__________________
Play emulated games online Main Rig||Intel Q6600@3.2 ghertz|4x1gb DDR2 1066|Asrock 1600sli 110db LGA 775|EVGA 8800gtx@620/1450/975|8800GT Physics|2x Seagate 160gb SATA150 Raid0|250 gb Samsung SATA2 HD|Seagate 7000.10 500gb HD|NEC 3520 4x/8x DVD+R/RW DL burner|Antec TP 650 watt|40" Sony Bravia 1080p|20.1" 5ms LCD 1680x1050 Native|Logitec 5.1 Speaker System w/15" Sub|Windows 7 64bit Ultimate|| SimplyBuyIt - Health&Nutrition |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 (permalink) | |
|
Extreme Mobility
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Santa Cruz, CA
Posts: 6,286
|
Quote:
__________________
cChip interpreter WIP - current status: Release Candidate LRx Filter RC - current performance rating: 9/10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 (permalink) | |
|
Heroes Might& Magic Champ
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Utterly destroying the soul of Gladiator@ with my box of tasty Cheesy Puff potato chips
Posts: 4,629
|
Giving something a pcsx2 certification (did you invent that concept ) is a little misleading just cuz it can 'run' 3d pcsx2 games. Getting at best 30fps with speed hacks enabled in the least intesive 3d game and getting that certification sounds just as much a marketing ploy as nvidia logos on unpatched Deus Ex 2.Such a rating should only be given to at very least the 7600gt. There is a reason the 7600gt and 8600gt are listed repeatedly and consistantly by users as the minimum requirements for pcsx2.
__________________
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 (permalink) |
|
Curiously Cheddar
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Malta, EU
Posts: 1,750
|
6600GT is roughly the same as a 7300GT, with the 6600 pulling ahead with a small margin. If the X3500 is a bit more powerful then the 7300, then I'm assuming its on 6600GT turf, which is quite capable at PCSX2. While it won't run everything at full, its a good minimum requirement.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 (permalink) | ||
|
Extreme Mobility
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Santa Cruz, CA
Posts: 6,286
|
Quote:
X3500 broke 80fps without speed hacks, and it deserves a spot.Quote:
__________________
cChip interpreter WIP - current status: Release Candidate LRx Filter RC - current performance rating: 9/10 |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#15 (permalink) |
|
Your resident reaper...
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Canada
Posts: 6,031
|
Well, Intels already told the world they intended to get back into the GPU market. And it looks like they're quite serious about it. They've got something similar to AMDs Fusion in the works obviously. I'm sure Nvidias always keeping an eye on Intel now
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
![]() ![]() Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Cambodia
Posts: 137
|
NVIDIA to Announce Tegra CPU-GPU combo NVIDIA to Announce Tegra: Computer-on-a-Chip solution :: News :: www.hardwarezone.com.sg
__________________
CPU Intel IV 3.2Ghz Display Card Geforce 5200 FX RAM 512MB HDD 120GB |
|
|
|
|
|
#19 (permalink) |
|
Extreme Mobility
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Santa Cruz, CA
Posts: 6,286
|
Please let it be a ULV graphics chip with PS 4.0 and VS 4.0 support... please let it be a ULV graphics chip with... I'll pay $3000 for it if it can run Vista with full aero... for over 6 hours continuously on battery.
__________________
cChip interpreter WIP - current status: Release Candidate LRx Filter RC - current performance rating: 9/10 |
|
|
|
|
|
#20 (permalink) | |
|
You're already dead...
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Post-Apocalyptic Earth
Posts: 4,042
|
if VIA is joining Nvidia, than its most-likely a GPU + CPU all-in-one solution. probably with RAM included as well, as GPU's contain their own ram, and the CPU would probably be able to use it now that they're combined. I can imagine it has the potential to be really fast, if the CPU and GPU are all on the same BUS. i can't wait to see how this turns out. the bad thing about something like this however is the poor-upgradability. if everything is all on the chip, you can't upgrade specific parts... this leads me to believe it might be something for laptops, handhelds, and mobile phones....
__________________
Quote:
check out my blog ![]() |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|