|
|
|||||||
| About Us | Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#21 (permalink) |
|
PCSX2 Coder
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Plymouth, UK
Posts: 9,744
|
hmm, after seeing that calculator, providing the calculation is right (which i believe it is) im not very convinced by that "leaked" shot. too many times leaked versions seem to be idiots trying to look "cool" which ends up biting them in the butt.
Edit: another suspicious thing, you google 6.14.10.6783, which is the shown driver version number which is "apparently" 8.4. you will find its actually the 8.3 driver.
__________________
http://www.generalemu.net/ Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 @ 3.4Ghz (425x8), eVGA 8800GTX 768mb, 996Gb HDs, 2Gb Corsair DDR2-800 @ DDR2-1020 5-5-5-18 Dual Channel, 14605 3dMark 06 Points CPU-Z Link 3dMark06 Score Link Dont PM me for help, use the forums, thats what its for! Last edited by refraction; April 16th, 2008 at 14:48. |
|
|
|
|
|
#22 (permalink) | |
|
Forever Guilty
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Toronto, Ontario Canada
Posts: 1,913
|
Quote:
6.14.10.6783 is also the number in catalyst 8.4 for xp (i think it was in a beta build though) here's a validation of 8.4 with the 6.14.10.6783 number techPowerUp GPU-Z Validation 3k89v
__________________
The prevalent effects of cocsa. That is my sin |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 (permalink) |
|
Ramma Gay
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Somwhere out in space? The Land of the Free? Heaven or Hell?
Posts: 11,458
|
I'm waiting with investing in a GPU until these cards are released. There's some pretty nifty features on them, such as the ultra low idle power usage. I just hope ATi can finally fix its AA so that 2xAA and 4xAA won't give as much of a penalty as it does now.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#25 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Holland
Posts: 1
|
First of all, I'm new to this forum, I just saw that picture so I had to register here to tell you guys it's clearly fake.
First of all, the 3DMark06 Calculator says enough Second of all, it's been made on a Mac, and in 3DMark06, it says OS: Windows XP Which clearly says it's bull****! ![]() Oh well, I'll leave again, have fun ladys. |
|
|
|
|
|
#26 (permalink) | |
|
Forever Guilty
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Toronto, Ontario Canada
Posts: 1,913
|
Quote:
I've used it check the internet explorer icon and the microsoft word document there could be other factors to account for the weird score, possible a non standard test config using the full 3dmark06 version with AA or something else unknown and the gpu-z matches the confidential specs ps. i'm no girl
__________________
The prevalent effects of cocsa. That is my sin Last edited by John Aiton; April 19th, 2008 at 17:06. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#27 (permalink) |
|
Google-translated
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Santa Cruz, CA
Posts: 3,382
|
There is Internet Explorer and Microsoft Word for Mac (or at least Microsoft Word for Mac)... but that's beside the point.
3DMark is Windows-only IIRC. But here is what you should consider: is this an engineering sample or a retail card? Because... Sapphire? And no (ES)? Hello? It seems like the guy has a RETAIL card... which is almost impossible at this point. I rest my case.
__________________
My best friend: Kopu: Asus Eee PC 701 Next best friend: Gamu CPU: Intel Core 2 Duo E7200 @ 3.80GHz RAM: 2GB of DDR2 800MHz (brandless, and brainless) GPU: ATI Radeon HD 4850 @ 800/1100 Good for PCSX2: overclock, overclock, and even more overclock. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|