Emuforums.com

Go Back   Emuforums.com > General Discussion > Hardware Discussion
About Us Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

Login to remove all ads!
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old April 15th, 2008   #1 (permalink)
Not a Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Poland
Posts: 64
GPU update

As the topic im gonna change my GPU because my 8600GT sucks The only thing i can afford at the time is the 9600GT Question is simple should i go for it will it give big boost of power or should i wait and gather more money Oh and i found this

GAINWARD 9600GT 1024MB G.S. 700/1750/2000MHz 629,00 zł
GAINWARD 9600GT 512MB G.S. 700/1750/2000MHz 619,00 zł

WTF i get 512MB more for 10 zł ?? BTW zł is Polish money :P
FoxSevent is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 15th, 2008   #2 (permalink)
PCSX2 Coder
 
refraction's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Plymouth, UK
Posts: 9,744
to be honest if i was you, id pick up an 8800GT, it performs better than the 9600GT and costs roughly the same, n itll stick kick the butt off your 8600.

The 9 series cards are pretty much a waste of money, rumors of some of them just being rebranded 8 series cards to get more money out of consumers.
__________________

http://www.generalemu.net/
Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 @ 3.4Ghz (425x8), eVGA 8800GTX 768mb, 996Gb HDs, 2Gb Corsair DDR2-800 @ DDR2-1020 5-5-5-18 Dual Channel, 14605 3dMark 06 Points
CPU-Z Link
3dMark06 Score Link
Dont PM me for help, use the forums, thats what its for!



refraction is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 15th, 2008   #3 (permalink)
Not a Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Poland
Posts: 64
The 8800GT in the same region price would be this one

8800GT 512MB DDR3 256 BIT
Core Clock Speed 700MHZ Stream Processors 112 Memory Clock Speed 2080MHZIs this rally stronger than that 9600GT 1024MB DDR3

I gues i wait and see what others have to say
FoxSevent is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 15th, 2008   #4 (permalink)
Jesus' Cheese
 
Cheesus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Pudding
Posts: 769
I'm gonna go ahead and second what refraction said.

8800GT over the 9600GT any day.
__________________

Intel Core 2 Duo E6600 @ 2.4Ghz -> 3.00Ghz
GeForce 8800GT 512mb @ 600/900 -> 720/1000
2x1Gb Corsair Value RAM 5-5-5-15 @ 667
Windows Vista Ultimate 32Bit SP1
750GB Hard Drive
Cheesus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 15th, 2008   #5 (permalink)
NGemu's Kawaii Imoutochan
 
cottonvibes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Super Mario World
Posts: 2,549
hmm, i didn't know there was a 1024mb 9600GT out.
i would probably get that instead of the 8800GT because the 512mb starts limiting you in games with big textures like Crysis.

but the 9600 has less stream processors i believe... i don't remember though...
anyways, both the 8800 and 9600 are good cards
__________________
PC Specs: AMD X2 4400+ @ 2.921 Ghz, 1.47 vCore | G92 8800 GTS 512mb @ 740/1944| 4GB Dual Channel OCZ Memory @ 835 Mhz (5-4-4-15-2T) | 700 Watt PSU | DVD-RW Drive | 500 GB Hitachi SATA II Hard Drive, 30 GB & 40 GB Western Digital IDE Hard Drives | 1920x1080 40" LCD Flat Pannel HDTV monitor |
Consoles: 1 PS3 (60 GB), 2 PS2s, 1 PS, 3 GBAs, 1 GB, and 1 old school NES

Having troubles with PCSX2? Check out my guide to get it running correctly.
Running PCSX2 Guide for Noobs
cottonvibes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 15th, 2008   #6 (permalink)
PCSX2 Coder
 
refraction's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Plymouth, UK
Posts: 9,744
Quote:
Originally Posted by FoxSevent View Post
The 8800GT in the same region price would be this one

8800GT 512MB DDR3 256 BIT
Core Clock Speed 700MHZ Stream Processors 112 Memory Clock Speed 2080MHZIs this rally stronger than that 9600GT 1024MB DDR3

I gues i wait and see what others have to say
just to remind you, clock speed means aboslutely NOTHING.
__________________

http://www.generalemu.net/
Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 @ 3.4Ghz (425x8), eVGA 8800GTX 768mb, 996Gb HDs, 2Gb Corsair DDR2-800 @ DDR2-1020 5-5-5-18 Dual Channel, 14605 3dMark 06 Points
CPU-Z Link
3dMark06 Score Link
Dont PM me for help, use the forums, thats what its for!



refraction is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 15th, 2008   #7 (permalink)
Irregular User
 
ViperXtreme's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Manila, Philippines
Posts: 914
my 9600GT always receives bad comments
*runs away crying*
__________________
System Specs? what "system specs?" are those edible?
My Deviantart:
http://viperxtreme.deviantart.com
ViperXtreme is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 15th, 2008   #8 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Brasil
Posts: 1
Go for 8800GT!! It's a better choice.
Ah, and about the 9600GT 1024MB, it won't make any diference for that card, it just hasn't enough power to use all that memory.
unknown1140 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 15th, 2008   #9 (permalink)
NGemu's Kawaii Imoutochan
 
cottonvibes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Super Mario World
Posts: 2,549
Quote:
Originally Posted by unknown1140 View Post
Go for 8800GT!! It's a better choice.
Ah, and about the 9600GT 1024MB, it won't make any diference for that card, it just hasn't enough power to use all that memory.
the benchmark of crysis on High settings uses over 700mb of memory, having more memory will help; especially when using AA.
i'm thinking a 9600GT 1024MB will out preform a 8800GT in crysis.
Runawayprisoner's 512mb 9600GT gets similar performance to his 512mb 8800GTS, which is a more powerful card than the 8800GT.
__________________
PC Specs: AMD X2 4400+ @ 2.921 Ghz, 1.47 vCore | G92 8800 GTS 512mb @ 740/1944| 4GB Dual Channel OCZ Memory @ 835 Mhz (5-4-4-15-2T) | 700 Watt PSU | DVD-RW Drive | 500 GB Hitachi SATA II Hard Drive, 30 GB & 40 GB Western Digital IDE Hard Drives | 1920x1080 40" LCD Flat Pannel HDTV monitor |
Consoles: 1 PS3 (60 GB), 2 PS2s, 1 PS, 3 GBAs, 1 GB, and 1 old school NES

Having troubles with PCSX2? Check out my guide to get it running correctly.
Running PCSX2 Guide for Noobs
cottonvibes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 15th, 2008   #10 (permalink)
Not a Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Poland
Posts: 64
Quote:
Originally Posted by cottonvibes View Post
but the 9600 has less stream processors i believe... i don't remember though...
Yup the 9600 has 64 SP and the 8800 112

Ok now what will give better performance
A) 1GB Memory
B) 48 SP More
FoxSevent is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 15th, 2008   #11 (permalink)
Google-translated
 
runawayprisoner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Santa Cruz, CA
Posts: 3,382
Quote:
Originally Posted by ViperXtreme View Post
my 9600GT always receives bad comments
*runs away crying*
Well, those comments didn't see the card coupled with a 45nm quad... running Crysis on Very High... and all that. nVidia's latest drivers haven't really made any wake-up calls... as far as I can see.
__________________
My best friend:
Kopu: Asus Eee PC 701


Next best friend: Gamu
CPU: Intel Core 2 Duo E7200 @ 3.80GHz
RAM: 2GB of DDR2 800MHz (brandless, and brainless)
GPU: ATI Radeon HD 4850 @ 800/1100

Good for PCSX2: overclock, overclock, and even more overclock.
runawayprisoner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 15th, 2008   #12 (permalink)
Jesus' Cheese
 
Cheesus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Pudding
Posts: 769
Yeah... Have you tried the 8800GT on the new drivers?

Just because the 9600 got a boost, doesnt mean the g92 8800s didn't

Oh, also, @RAP hows the 9800GTX doing so far? Does it OC well?
__________________

Intel Core 2 Duo E6600 @ 2.4Ghz -> 3.00Ghz
GeForce 8800GT 512mb @ 600/900 -> 720/1000
2x1Gb Corsair Value RAM 5-5-5-15 @ 667
Windows Vista Ultimate 32Bit SP1
750GB Hard Drive

Last edited by Cheesus; April 15th, 2008 at 20:26.
Cheesus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 15th, 2008   #13 (permalink)
Google-translated
 
runawayprisoner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Santa Cruz, CA
Posts: 3,382
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cheesus View Post
Yeah... Have you tried the 8800GT on the new drivers?

Just because the 9600 got a boost, doesnt mean the g92 8800s didn't.
Sold it so fast... because a 17K 3DMark06 card is just so damn hot! But I'm getting a 9800GTX to replace the 9600GT, so I could care less! (And yay for eVGA step-up!)
__________________
My best friend:
Kopu: Asus Eee PC 701


Next best friend: Gamu
CPU: Intel Core 2 Duo E7200 @ 3.80GHz
RAM: 2GB of DDR2 800MHz (brandless, and brainless)
GPU: ATI Radeon HD 4850 @ 800/1100

Good for PCSX2: overclock, overclock, and even more overclock.
runawayprisoner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 15th, 2008   #14 (permalink)
Forever Guilty
 
John Aiton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Toronto, Ontario Canada
Posts: 1,913
Quote:
Originally Posted by runawayprisoner View Post
Sold it so fast... because a 17K 3DMark06 card is just so damn hot! But I'm getting a 9800GTX to replace the 9600GT, so I could care less! (And yay for eVGA step-up!)
don't man, the gt200 just got a release date in june and the specs are crazy again (240 stream processors )

there will be a simultaneus launch of the 9800gt and 9900gtx

the 9800gt will be a cheaper 55nm 9800gtx with an architecture called g92b
and the 9900gtx will be a 65nm card on the new gt200 cores

I believe the codename is d10u-30 for the g200 chips in the test cards,
and gt200-300 for the beta samples of them

i'll need to ask some people to make sure, but a late q2 release is planned
John Aiton is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 15th, 2008   #15 (permalink)
Google-translated
 
runawayprisoner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Santa Cruz, CA
Posts: 3,382
Well yeah... we heard enough things about 9800GX2 and 9800GTX. I'm not the kind that would wait another two months for a potentially more expensive card that wouldn't really get much more done.

Verdict? I'm tired of switching around with nVidia flagships. But IF they really can push out a good card then I'm willing to shell out another $300 to trade my 9800GTX in... and that is IF they are really that good. I highly doubt it, though. It could be like 2-3 fps in Crysis and 500-1000 more points in 3DMark06 or something, but what about the price? The... priiiiccceee...? I don't need to remind you how much a 9800GX2 costs... do I?

Edit: And rumors got to G200, then down to G100, and the last I heard was that the new ones won't be G100 but would be G102 instead, and then just yesterday, I got confirmation that they wouldn't even be G102! And this kind of reminds me of the 8900GTX and 8900GX2 rumors. They turned out to be 9800GTX and 9800GX2 instead. (8 switched with 9)

I think these rumors are more like... fanboys' wishes for nVidia to release something really ground-breaking... something that can handle Crysis at insane settings or something. But I face it and I know: a 9800GTX volt-modded and overclocked under water-cooling would be waaaay too extreme already.
__________________
My best friend:
Kopu: Asus Eee PC 701


Next best friend: Gamu
CPU: Intel Core 2 Duo E7200 @ 3.80GHz
RAM: 2GB of DDR2 800MHz (brandless, and brainless)
GPU: ATI Radeon HD 4850 @ 800/1100

Good for PCSX2: overclock, overclock, and even more overclock.
runawayprisoner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 15th, 2008   #16 (permalink)
Forever Guilty
 
John Aiton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Toronto, Ontario Canada
Posts: 1,913
Quote:
Originally Posted by runawayprisoner View Post
Well yeah... we heard enough things about 9800GX2 and 9800GTX. I'm not the kind that would wait another two months for a potentially more expensive card that wouldn't really get much more done.

Verdict? I'm tired of switching around with nVidia flagships. But IF they really can push out a good card then I'm willing to shell out another $300 to trade my 9800GTX in... and that is IF they are really that good. I highly doubt it, though. It could be like 2-3 fps in Crysis and 500-1000 more points in 3DMark06 or something, but what about the price? The... priiiiccceee...? I don't need to remind you how much a 9800GX2 costs... do I?

Edit: And rumors got to G200, then down to G100, and the last I heard was that the new ones won't be G100 but would be G102 instead, and then just yesterday, I got confirmation that they wouldn't even be G102! And this kind of reminds me of the 8900GTX and 8900GX2 rumors. They turned out to be 9800GTX and 9800GX2 instead. (8 switched with 9)

I think these rumors are more like... fanboys' wishes for nVidia to release something really ground-breaking... something that can handle Crysis at insane settings or something. But I face it and I know: a 9800GTX volt-modded and overclocked under water-cooling would be waaaay too extreme already.
if all goes well the 9900gtx will be incredibly fast
we're talking about a card that could push 19 by 12 in crysis maxed with 16 AA

I'm getting 2

the 4870 will be out in june too, the price differences shouldn't be too big compared to current gen
so it would be a waste to not wait and save up
John Aiton is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 15th, 2008   #17 (permalink)
Google-translated
 
runawayprisoner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Santa Cruz, CA
Posts: 3,382
I'll see what I can do with the 9800GTX.
__________________
My best friend:
Kopu: Asus Eee PC 701


Next best friend: Gamu
CPU: Intel Core 2 Duo E7200 @ 3.80GHz
RAM: 2GB of DDR2 800MHz (brandless, and brainless)
GPU: ATI Radeon HD 4850 @ 800/1100

Good for PCSX2: overclock, overclock, and even more overclock.
runawayprisoner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 16th, 2008   #18 (permalink)
VBA-M Team
 
Squall-Leonhart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 4,137
Quote:
Originally Posted by unknown1140 View Post
Go for 8800GT!! It's a better choice.
Ah, and about the 9600GT 1024MB, it won't make any diference for that card, it just hasn't enough power to use all that memory.
Thats not really correct, you just need to really hit the high quality settings hard to get anything out of that much memory.

Quote:
Originally Posted by runawayprisoner View Post
Well yeah... we heard enough things about 9800GX2 and 9800GTX. I'm not the kind that would wait another two months for a potentially more expensive card that wouldn't really get much more done.

Verdict? I'm tired of switching around with nVidia flagships. But IF they really can push out a good card then I'm willing to shell out another $300 to trade my 9800GTX in... and that is IF they are really that good. I highly doubt it, though. It could be like 2-3 fps in Crysis and 500-1000 more points in 3DMark06 or something, but what about the price? The... priiiiccceee...? I don't need to remind you how much a 9800GX2 costs... do I?

Edit: And rumors got to G200, then down to G100, and the last I heard was that the new ones won't be G100 but would be G102 instead, and then just yesterday, I got confirmation that they wouldn't even be G102! And this kind of reminds me of the 8900GTX and 8900GX2 rumors. They turned out to be 9800GTX and 9800GX2 instead. (8 switched with 9)

I think these rumors are more like... fanboys' wishes for nVidia to release something really ground-breaking... something that can handle Crysis at insane settings or something. But I face it and I know: a 9800GTX volt-modded and overclocked under water-cooling would be waaaay too extreme already.
GT200 wafer is hot.

Last edited by Squall-Leonhart; April 16th, 2008 at 00:34. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Squall-Leonhart is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT. The time now is 06:12.

© 2006 - 2008 Emu Forums | About Emu Forums | Legal | A member of the Crowdgather Forum Community


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0 Release Candidate 3
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC5