Emuforums.com

Go Back   Emuforums.com > General Discussion > Game/Console Discussion
About Us Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

Login to remove all ads!
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old April 21st, 2008   #1 (permalink)
Unregistered User
 
Linktothepast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Macedonia, Greece
Posts: 425
PS3 to get smaller Cell and/or RSX chips in August? Slim ps3 on the way

Here is the article by Engaget:
PS3 to get smaller Cell and/or RSX chips in August? - Engadget
Quote:
Nikko Citigroup upgraded its rating on Sony this morning in anticipation of it breaking even on PS3 costs earlier than expected. At the moment, Sony sells the PS3 at a loss. The respected group of analysts is now earmarking August as the milestone month. Sony's CFO recently suggested that the move would occur in the second half of the year -- a date analysts then pegged at November. No details behind the new upbeat expectations were provided by Nikko CG. However, it's safe to assume that the PS3's break-even event will be realized by a switch to a sub-65nm cell processor, sub-90nm RSX graphics chip, or both, since the smaller chips are less-costly to manufacturer.

P.S. It's worth noting that Sony has consistently stated that the PS3 will only break-even when both the Cell and RSX chips have shrunk.

Update: Reader Yaddam205 just reminded us about the "Slim PS3" redesign rumored for release in Autumn. No guarantees but smaller, less power-hungry, and cooler running chips would certainly be at the foundation of such a rig.
Probably speculations, but if that happens a slimmer and more energy efficient PS3 would be quite a sexy device don't you think ?
__________________


System Specifications: Athlon64 3200+, 1GB RAM, 9600GT 512MB, 200+250 GB HD, Windows xp sp2
Linktothepast is online now   Reply With Quote
Old April 21st, 2008   #2 (permalink)
LET'S GO!! COME ON!!
 
Hard core Rikki's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Perpetual Hawaii
Posts: 4,910
Quote:
Probably speculations, but if that happens a slimmer and more energy efficient PS3 would be quite a sexy device don't you think
Not sexier if tghey dare ask for more $$$ (or even, not reduce prices), in exchange for that 'extra convenience'
__________________
< My deviantART || GENERALEMU || XTEMU || Webcomics
VBA-M || @ES <(^_^)> <(^_^)>


Hard core Rikki is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 21st, 2008   #3 (permalink)
大嘴巴
 
Fadingz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: 應許之地
Posts: 2,930
PSP size PS3 would be great
I wouldn't mind external screen and blueray drive if that is the case.
__________________
My deviantART~

QX9650 stock | G.Skill 2GB DDR2 1066 RAM x 4 | Vista 64 Ultimate | Quadro FX4600 | X-Fi Elite Pro | SAMSUNG 2253BW | Cosmos S | ASUS RAMPAGE FORMULA | Western Digital Raptor X x2 | ThermalTake 850W
Fadingz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 21st, 2008   #4 (permalink)
Dark Sage
 
ozzgx4's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: London
Posts: 962
Well a more energy efficient will be much better, but only as long as the price is not too high. But I have a feeling that it might be round-about the same price as the current PS3
__________________

I sat back looking at the stars and began to think...where the HECK is my roof?!
ozzgx4 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 22nd, 2008   #5 (permalink)
Registered User
 
StriderVM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Philippines
Posts: 1,561
Wait, I think doesn't make any sense... At least for me.

They say Sony makes a loss for any PS3 bought, then it says they will be closer to getting even, then create a 65nm cell, which I think is even more expensive, where will those chips come from?
__________________

Current PC specs
MSI K9VGM-V
AMD Athlon64 X2 5600 OCed @ 3052Mhz (218x14)
GeCube Radeon 3850 256MB gDDR3 OCed @ 740/1000
2x1024MB DDR2 667Mhz RAM (One PQI one Kingston.... O_o)
StriderVM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 22nd, 2008   #6 (permalink)
professor el tasto'
 
PCXL-Fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Canada ──────────────────── PC Accelerator (aka PCXL) was a Computer gaming magazine published from 1997 until 2000
Posts: 2,330
It'll mean Sony won't have to lose as much money for each console sold, and maybe just maybe they'll be able to break even.

They probably aren't going to drop the price unless they feel they need to to compete against m$ and nintendo. They probably want to recover the money they've lost in their Sony Computer Entertainment subsidary.
__________________

E6600 Core 2 Duo
Geforce 8800GTX @ Stock Speed. 1x 2.1GB HDD, 1x 1.4GB HDD
Windows XP Pro Sp2.


| Flexing my penticeps for tri-mammaried ladies across the world |
PCXL-Fan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 22nd, 2008   #7 (permalink)
Custom User Title
 
Thanakil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: mtl,qc
Posts: 1,820
Quote:
Originally Posted by StriderVM View Post
then create a 65nm cell, which I think is even more expensive, where will those chips come from?
"since the smaller chips are less-costly to manufacturer"
Using the smaller chip will make it easier for them to break even, since it'll cost them less.
So if they don't drop the price, it'll make it easier to break even instead of losing money.
__________________

The world will end with robots killing us all.
And you know what?
We'll be too busy thinking "HOLY S*** THAT'S SO COOL" to do anything about it.
Thanakil is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT. The time now is 20:23.

© 2006 - 2008 Emu Forums | About Emu Forums | Legal | A member of the Crowdgather Forum Community


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0 Release Candidate 3
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC5