Dolphin has become slower in latest revs =(

[locazoo]

welll that... SSBM it's running really slow! it was running at 40~50 before.. now its runnig at 17~20 after i updated and compiled the SVN (r1379)... its a general Slowdown for all games, wii and gc. =(

__________________
CPU: AMD Athlon X2 5200+ @3.110GHz
Video: Onboard GeForce 8200
RAM: 2x 1GB Corsair 667MHz @ 711Mhz, Dual Channel
Motherboard: Asus M3N78-VM
Controllers: Xbox 360, Wiimote & Nunchuck
OS: Vista Ultimate x64, Windows 7 x64
DolphinWx Rev: Always last rev

[Dax]

So? As things improve it might slow down for a while. These aren't official releases.

__________________

My PC Specs|My Consoles|Emu SVNs|Project OSX|How to ask a Question

[kronoxrox]

You know as compatibility increases, emulators tend to get slow sometimes... More instructions to read over time.
Also i think one of the latest adittions were the AA filters. So maybe the slowdown is there, but sadly i can't confirm it.

[Dax]

AA is only enabled if you compile it with it enabled.

__________________

My PC Specs|My Consoles|Emu SVNs|Project OSX|How to ask a Question

[Geomancer]

Can you give me instructions to compile with AA enabled? thanks.

__________________
Intel® Core™2 Duo E8400 @ 3.60GHz «-» Thermalright Ultra 120 eXtreme «-» Gigabyte™ GA-P35-DS4 «-» Corsair™ XMS2 DHX 2X2GB DDR2-800 4-4-4-12 «-» Sapphire HD 4850 Toxic 512 mb «-» Cooler Master Silent Pro 600 W «-» Samsung SyncMaster 2232GW «-» Edifier C2 2.1 «-» Windows 7 RC1 x64

[xcedf]

Originally Posted by locazoo

welll that... SSBM it's running really slow! it was running at 40~50 before.. now its runnig at 17~20 after i updated and compiled the SVN (r1379)... its a general Slowdown for all games, wii and gc. =(

Maybe you've updated the Video driver,
for example
MP1 with
178.24 21-45 fps
169.25 32-60 fps

__________________
My PC: Core2Duo e6750 2,66 Ghz (@ 3,20 Ghz), MB: Gigabyte GA-965p-s3, Ram: 2Gb (2x1) Corsair XMS2 PRO pc6400 800Mhz 4-4-4-12, Video: gf9800Gt 1Gb, HDD: Seagate SATAII 400Gb (372Gb)

[Shadow Lady]

MP1 got faster for me over earlier builds, r1292 48fps-50fps average r1369 54-56fps average on my usual tests and actually SSBM got faster too, used to be 36fps on r1292 and in r1369 it got to 58fps on my tests, maybe you werent using the same settings as before? I enable everything except "lock threads to cores"

Maybe something went wrong when compiling? I use omegadox's compiles usually and he doesnt have any newer than r1369 so I cant test newer ones but shouldne be much a difference :P

I cant test wii games tho i dont have a wii

However as mentioned before sometimes this happens in new versions when there's something new being worked on, happens in every emulator usually but sometime later there's new speed increase or something. in my case i'd prefer to get more games working than better speed in just very few. It's also the usual goal on a emultor, to get the machine emulated as close as possible to the real one which usually means more games working.

__________________

Main Rig: Pentium Dual-Core E2160 @ 2.8GHz -- 9600GT @ 715/1033MHz -- 4GB DDR2-667 4-4-4-12 -- Windows Server 2008 SP2
Collecting dust: AMD Athlon XP 2600+ -- ATI Radeon 9500 Pro -- SB Live 5.1 Digital -- 2.5GB DDR 2-2-2-5 Ram -- Windows 2003 server r2 SP1

---

Last edited by Shadow Lady; December 4th, 2008 at 00:36..

[darkhider]

Mp1 is quite smooth. I'm getting 60fps most of the time.

__________________
-Intel E8400 @ 3.9ghz
-4 GB Ram
-Nvidia GeForce 9800 GTX+
-Vista x64

[Rguima]

Hey, why don't you try r1387? Keep trying newest revs and post what you get with'em.

__________________
Desktop: AMD Athlon 64 X2 3600+ 1.9GHz
Kingston 2GB DDR2-667MHz
Sapphire ATI Radeon HD2600XT 256MB GDDR3
Maxtor 40GB + 160GB
Cooler Master eXtreme Power 500W
Windows 7 Ultimate (x86)

Notebook: AMD Turion X2 TL-56 1.8GHz
Nanya 1GB DDR2-667MHz
GeForce Go 6150 128MB
ST 160GB
Windows 7 Ultimate (x86)

[omegadox]

Originally Posted by daxtsu

AA is only enabled if you compile it with it enabled.

...And don't use the 'AA' because Sonic1 did not code it properly :P, he was trying to bind an array of textures to the renderbufferEXT which is not right, I believe. Also I think you have blit the buffers. I mentioned it to Sonic1 and he basically repsonds "I just threw sh-- together", so the 'AA' wasn't code properly.