Chankast with non nvidia & ati gc

a_en · December 19th, 2004

i got major graphic problem with my i 915 graphic adapter.
maybe someone have solution for this

**Chrono Archangel** · December 19th, 2004

dont expect much... integrated chips are nowhere near as performent as "real" GFX cards

__________________

When Pigs Fly: The Death of Oink, the Birth of Dissent, and a Brief History of Record Industry Suicide.

KanedA · December 19th, 2004

it also depends on what chip you have build in your mobo doesn't it?... an a_en yours is... very weak... get a new gfx card

__________________

a_en · December 20th, 2004

Quote:

Originally Posted by KanedA

it also depends on what chip you have build in your mobo doesn't it?... an a_en yours is... very weak... get a new gfx card

very weak .... ??
no , this chip roughly equal to radeon 9200 se (with dx9) , but it like other G intel mobo series this chip don't have HW TnL

**Kane** · December 20th, 2004

That's weak.

__________________

>Site Live<
Pop over to my site for help with setting up PSX emulators.
Help for the Final Fantasies and other RPGs avalaible
Celes: (Desktop) Athlon 64 X2 4200+, 2Gb 400MHz DDR Ram, MSI K8N Platinum, GeForce 8800 GTS 320Mb, 500Gb RAID HDD, Vista Business
Erika: (MCPC) Athlon XP 2400+, 1Gb 400MHz DDR Ram, geForce 6800 256Mb, 80Gb Hdd, XP 2005 MCE
Kimiko: (Desktop 2) Athlon 64 3000+, 512Mb 400MHz DDR Ram, Asus K8V, geForce 6800 128Mb

a_en · December 21st, 2004

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kane-Sama

That's weak.

at least it's not " very weak "

btw this mobo has pci xpress
until i have some $ ...

Riskbreaker927 · December 21st, 2004

No, that's definitely "very weak." #1, your card isn't equivalent to a radeon 9200se. #2, even if it was, it would still be much much weaker because hardware T&L is the reason modern cards are so fast. without hardware T&L it's essentially a dorito chip. #3 if it doesn't have hardware T&L it also does not have pixel or vertex shaders, which are another reason modern cards are so fast and look so good. #4, even if it was equivalent to a radeon 9200se, a 9200se is not good at all.

Also just 'cause your computer has directx 9 installed does not mean you have a directx9 graphics card. DX7 introduced T&L and DX8 introduced shaders. DX9 expanded the capabilities of shaders. As your card does not even support a DX7 feature, I would hardly call it a DX9 card.

Don't expect to play chankast, ever. (I think your current graphics card might actually be so bad that if you try to upgrade, the card might just get up and walk out of your computer out of disgust for what it replaced.) Ok I exaggerated a bit, but until you upgrade to a new card you have no business trying to play games of any sort on your computer.

KanedA · December 21st, 2004

Thank you ooh all my deffenders

and nothing more to add

__________________

December 19th, 2004	#1 (permalink)
a_en Registered User Join Date: Mar 2004 Posts: 192	Chankast with non nvidia & ati gc i got major graphic problem with my i 915 graphic adapter. maybe someone have solution for this

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

December 19th, 2004	#2 (permalink)
Chrono Archangel Administrator Join Date: Dec 2001 Location: Montreal, Canada Posts: 7,462	dont expect much... integrated chips are nowhere near as performent as "real" GFX cards __________________ When Pigs Fly: The Death of Oink, the Birth of Dissent, and a Brief History of Record Industry Suicide.

December 19th, 2004	#3 (permalink)
KanedA PS2 PAL[v9] Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: PolanD Posts: 5,292	it also depends on what chip you have build in your mobo doesn't it?... an a_en yours is... very weak... get a new gfx card __________________

December 20th, 2004	#5 (permalink)
Kane 邪魔ゎ指せない Join Date: Jan 2002 Location: Gosport, England Posts: 26,305	That's weak. __________________ >Site Live< Pop over to my site for help with setting up PSX emulators. Help for the Final Fantasies and other RPGs avalaible Celes: (Desktop) Athlon 64 X2 4200+, 2Gb 400MHz DDR Ram, MSI K8N Platinum, GeForce 8800 GTS 320Mb, 500Gb RAID HDD, Vista Business Erika: (MCPC) Athlon XP 2400+, 1Gb 400MHz DDR Ram, geForce 6800 256Mb, 80Gb Hdd, XP 2005 MCE Kimiko: (Desktop 2) Athlon 64 3000+, 512Mb 400MHz DDR Ram, Asus K8V, geForce 6800 128Mb

December 21st, 2004	#7 (permalink)
Riskbreaker927 Registered User Join Date: Jun 2004 Posts: 40	No, that's definitely "very weak." #1, your card isn't equivalent to a radeon 9200se. #2, even if it was, it would still be much much weaker because hardware T&L is the reason modern cards are so fast. without hardware T&L it's essentially a dorito chip. #3 if it doesn't have hardware T&L it also does not have pixel or vertex shaders, which are another reason modern cards are so fast and look so good. #4, even if it was equivalent to a radeon 9200se, a 9200se is not good at all. Also just 'cause your computer has directx 9 installed does not mean you have a directx9 graphics card. DX7 introduced T&L and DX8 introduced shaders. DX9 expanded the capabilities of shaders. As your card does not even support a DX7 feature, I would hardly call it a DX9 card. Don't expect to play chankast, ever. (I think your current graphics card might actually be so bad that if you try to upgrade, the card might just get up and walk out of your computer out of disgust for what it replaced.) Ok I exaggerated a bit, but until you upgrade to a new card you have no business trying to play games of any sort on your computer.

December 21st, 2004	#8 (permalink)
KanedA PS2 PAL[v9] Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: PolanD Posts: 5,292	Thank you ooh all my deffenders and nothing more to add __________________