Quote:
Originally Posted by refraction
yea thatd be good.
also some AA comparisons would be cool (maybe go over the bars so you have lines for each AA speed, rather than seperate ones) or just do 1 test.
for example, FFX has little to no impact on the different AA settings, but if you try Grandia 3, you get about a 50% performance hit between off and AAx4
|
yea and the prob is where and how many shots to take as it varies so much between areas. I just tried Grandia 3 and in one place I got even 18 fps increase (78 vs 60) with VM build while in another it added only ~2 fps increase.
And yea it does vary so much from game to game if AA and BF slows down or not, Grandia 3 does suffer so much more with AA and BF. But I love how sleek it looks during battles with max quality settings during spell animations.
Better than on a real ps2...
Won't promise anything that I will add things to this review, but if I do I'd prolly add max quality settings performance for at least 2.8GHz speed to the graphs and possibly some VM vs non VM build screenshots. I think my bro saved the MS Excel work but not sure, takes time to add all those 72 fps rates to the work sheet and create the graphs as well so wouldn't wanna do it again...
__________________
Intel® Core™2 Duo E8400 @ 4.0GHz «-» Gigabyte P35-DS4 «-» CellShock 2x1GB @ DDR2-1200 5-5-4-10 «-» JetWay 8800GT 512 MB @ 705/1750/1015 MHz «-» Thermaltake ToughPower 750W «-» Sony Multiscan G400 19" CRT «-» OCZ Vendetta 2 «-» Creative SoundBlaster Audigy «-» Logitech X-530 5.1 «-» Sennheiser HD 212 Pro «-» Logitech MX™518 Gaming-Grade «-» Razer Mantis Speed «-» Windows XP Pro SP3 «-» Windows Server 2k8 XSOS 3.0 BETA
Last edited by RPGW1ZaRD; August 14th, 2006 at 13:49.