View Single Post
Old June 10th, 2005   #31 (permalink)
n_w95482
Administrator
 
n_w95482's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: California
Posts: 4,684
Here's the results from Pete's framebuffer test.

---------------------------------

Frontbuffer reading speed (back)
---------------------------------

Format: 01 - Speed: 36.9405 Mpix/s 110.821 MB/s

Format: 02 - Speed: 37.8527 Mpix/s 151.411 MB/s

Format: 03 - Speed: 37.3992 Mpix/s 112.198 MB/s

Format: 04 - Speed: 38.1856 Mpix/s 152.743 MB/s



Frontbuffer reading speed (front)
---------------------------------

Format: 01 - Speed: 37.6614 Mpix/s 112.984 MB/s

Format: 02 - Speed: 37.7269 Mpix/s 150.908 MB/s

Format: 03 - Speed: 37.9453 Mpix/s 113.836 MB/s

Format: 04 - Speed: 38.0983 Mpix/s 152.393 MB/s


I also ran AquaMark3 twice and for some reason the first run was way slower than the second (and I took them a week or two apart). On the first test, the massive overdraw explosion went at about 8 FPS but went much faster the second time. Maybe I had AA/AF forced to a high level without knowing it... I also ran 3DMark 2001 at 1600x1200 and my score was somewhere around 15,500.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg am3.jpg (131.5 KB, 52 views)
__________________
Main PC:
DFI LAN Party nF4 SLI-DR Expert w/406-bta BIOS, AMD Opteron 165 (CCBBE 0615 EPMW) @ 3 GHz (334x9), 1.55v w/D-Tek Fuzion WB; 2x1 GB OCZ PC4000 EB Plats @ 250 MHz, 3-3-2-8, 3:4, 2.7v; ATi Radeon X1900XT 512 MB @ 668/855 w/DD Tyee WB, 150 GB WD Raptor, 4x500 GB WD RE2 (RAID 10), SB Audigy 2 ZS, 700w OCZ GameXStream, CM Stacker 810, Windows XP Pro
n_w95482 is offline   Reply With Quote