Quote:
|
Originally Posted by wise_evian
I dont see how raiding a country with no immediate threat to that country a way to spread democracy. Call me crazy but i think that would just tick that country being raided off to the point where it doesnt want anything to do with the attacking country lol
|
i hate to bashing only your comments but, eh..
Thing is Sadam's scientists told him that they were much more advanced in their chemical and biological weapons then they ever really were. They lied because if they didn't they would have been punished by sadam. Sadam, believeing the lie acted like he did have a large stock pile of weapons. Taking this into account Bush knew as much about Sadam's weapons as Sadam did, even if it were all a lie. How can Bush be expected to know more about Sadam's weapons then he did? He can't. And attacking Iraq was justified for the intellegance given. And it will spread democracy more than not attacking them. Before they had dictatorship. Now they can look forward to electing leaders in free/fair elections. Anyone remember when Sadam got 100% of the vote? That sounded like a free/fair election.
__________________
