View Single Post
Old July 10th, 2001   #14 (permalink)
404
Ultraman Agent
 
404's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: 0101001111010110101001
Posts: 680
Quote:
Originally posted by Rargh
404, I totally respect ur opinion.
I m just anxious about one thing w/ square;

The FF' s

They seem to represent the future tactical business method of that company:

Great graphics, and low stories. Perfect for the mass...
When i see games like xenogears made by the same company (BTW, this team is w/ namco now), I can just question myself why it s in a decadent way.
They ve got the money.
So why would they make more money?(ok it s very stupid and pretty off-topic) They can just do better games than the previous ones.
Remember the SNES time...
Nearly all the Square games were (and are) good.

Bye
You're right (well sort of). Today Games are more likely disappointing. They made games today only to show you that 'A' game has the best and beautiful graphics than others. They only want to maximum the ability of today's hardware. And forgetting other part that makes a game a real game. They want more and more money (well, arent we all?) from their games and forgetting the core of their games.

Past Games/Old games are still the best (ok, the graphics may sucked compared to what you've seen today) but if you're asking about real gameplay, hours of fun, and the gamers rejoice, nothing can beat the old skool games.

Imagine Super Mario Bros, FF1-6, DOOM, Duke Nukem 3D, ZeroType, etc....
__________________
= hah hah hah! I'm back! not! =
---
Last edited by 404 on 09-09-99 at 06:66 AM
404 is offline   Reply With Quote