Emuforums.com - View Single Post

serge2k · June 5th, 2009

I already got rid of my switch

void (*operation[256])(Processor *p)

operation[opcode](this)

if i wasn't using C++ then it would be easier. As it is now it works but I'm not sure if it's that good of an idea, eliminates the need to check every time but I don't know if there is any issue doing it that way.

I think I'm doing the interrupts correctly then.

I did read through the emutalk but I had questions and this place seems more active.

June 5th, 2009	#63 (permalink)
serge2k Registered User Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: surrey Posts: 45	I already got rid of my switch void (operation[256])(Processor p) operation[opcode](this) if i wasn't using C++ then it would be easier. As it is now it works but I'm not sure if it's that good of an idea, eliminates the need to check every time but I don't know if there is any issue doing it that way. I think I'm doing the interrupts correctly then. I did read through the emutalk but I had questions and this place seems more active.