I have never seen a review that much in favour of ATi...which omitted all of nVidia's stronger cards...look at when the review came out...so then wheres the 7900GT? the 7900GTX? 7950GX2? 7950GT? , both 8800GTSs? the 8800GTX? heck even the 8800GT is missing (those 8 series cards were released within the requirements of the review because as always they were about before their ATI counterpart the HD 3850 (which is shown in the review)).... yes it's about old cards...but those cards were out within the requirements...
And the 7800GTX was beaten by the X1650? It would be quite bad if a mid-range card that's newer by almost two years would not be able to manage that.
I would also love to know how they got the X800s to run Crysis and some of the other games...
Also when I checked reviews the 7600GT was far closer in performance to my X850XT (sure it's not the platinum edition, but 10 extra FPS is still too much)
Still biased but the FEAR and Quake4 reviews are at least closer to reality
http://www.3dcenter.org/artikel/die-...erationen/fear
http://www.3dcenter.org/artikel/die-...tionen/quake-4
__________________
Intel Core2Quad Q9550 (2.83Ghz stock) | ASUS P5Q | 2x2GB Transcend JetRam DDR2-800 | ASUS ENGTX260\HDTP\896M | Windows Vista Home Premium 64bit SP1
The Champ has retired but may his Legacy live on FOREVER !!!!
Get it right fools! The glass is HALF-EMPTY, not half-full!!!
!!! WARNING: Emulation requires a brain !!! WARNING: Emulation =/= Piracy !!!
Last edited by SCHUMI_4EVER; March 26th, 2009 at 20:19..