Well thx for telling me all this
I thought it was built on the x86 architecture
So if the Xbxo 360's CPU is 9.6Ghz total (somewhere around that) than its core clock is physically faster than the PS3 if the PS3 was not based on the cell architecture CPU. In the specification its core clock is 3.2GHz total not 3.2 x 8 or 3.2 x2 just 3.2GHz when all added together (talking about the PS3)
THX though I was just wondering since PC are way more advanced than consoles and why PC's have a hard time emulating them. I know that PS2 emulation is not that good but thats not the same problem as emulating an Xbox 360 or PS3 since the PS2 has alot of processors (Slow though) so its harder to synchronize it from the processor to the bus rather than emulating 3 to 8 cores (depending on what kind of processor you have)
THX
IBM has also been working with AMD to create a processor that handles all instructions (SSE,SSE2,SSE3,SSSE3,SSE4,SSE4.1,SSE5,PowerPC,etc. ).
Im also thinking about PS3 emulation.
Im also thinking about PS3 emulation.
Last edited by justinxtreme; January 10th, 2009 at 21:19..
Reason: Automerged Doublepost