|
Hmmmm?
Efficiency isn't about how many HURTZ you can put the chip through before it flops over and calls you a demon and bursts into flames.
You intel fanboys are weird :P
With less cache size, and less cycles to calculate with, most AMD processors have always kept up with 'brute force' design Intel processors.
Even Intels' newest concept pieces come along on these lines, they've gotten away with it this time because they had the infrastructure and capacity to make the 45nm jump before AMD did.
It really is as absolutely blitzingly simple as that (though it didn't help that AMDs starting bid in the Quad core market was terrible).
AMD have been better with less for a long time and you only get that with efficiency.
|