Quote:
|
That's just asinine and retarded. "Don't give us any new features! We don't want them! Screw you conformos!!!"
|
Why the **** do you have to be so childish to people who have different views to yourself? Are you that egotistical that no one elses view matters?
The point remains: I don't see the point in all the new visual features Vista offers. There
should be a choice to turn them off. Mandating that they are left on is just......
Quote:
|
*facepalm* vista does NOT take up 40G.
|
Note how I said "up to 40GB". I didn't say 40GB. I say you have problems reading, or you are that intent on defending Vista for what its worth.
Quote:
|
Sorry. Bo-sh**. I've seen no evidence of excessive mem leakage by Vista. Sure it uses more than XP. But we've been down that road already and I have no desire to circle the block.
|
Oh really, then why is RAM requirements so excessive? Why is the server version much more efficient? And why is Linux more efficient?
And yes, we will circle the block. The software's use of RAM is excessive. I challenge you personally to write a application that uses less than 16MB RAM. If you can't, you have zero point defending what its optimized software or not.
Quote:
|
Vista doesn't excessively leak memory. The memory it does take up, it's welcome to. 4GB is pretty standard and I've never come close to using it all.
|
NO IT IS NOT!!!!
You are encouraging bloat? Consider me your worst nightmare.
NO ONE defends bloat in front of ME.