Well Samor, I thought we put this arguement to rest, you like Vista, so you walk home with that, I like XP so I walk home with that, but since you are so desperate on dragging this arguement forwards, let me tell you that I wont be the one to back down.
Quote:
|
"badvista" Yeah, I believe all the articles from theregister too =P
|
I the hell care whether you believe or not! Its my opinion!
Quote:
|
dunno what you're trying to say here..
|
I think someone with an actual brain would! But I'll repeat it in simpler words for sake of arguement, comparing Windows 98 with XP isn't the same as comparing XP to Vista (XP has a much higher edge in the first case than Vista does in the second case)
Quote:
|
I bet it will just install, and your age old pc isn't as old as you claim anyway.
|
I remember SOMEONE saying not too long ago that they had a 2.8 GHz P4 and Vista wouldn't install because the graphics card was not supported. And that is a pretty high-end P4, the starting models only had a 1.3-1.6 GHz processor
Oh yeah and the actual date is July 1999, not exactly a 21st century PC is it?
Quote:
|
yes, one game I like does not work
|
Like I said, my opinion, and there are probably more, I don't think you've carried out a research which confirms that only one game doesn't work
Quote:
|
so the entire OS must suck!
|
It doesn't suck based on just that, the other 50 reasons mentioned over the past 4 pages also come into account I think!!
Quote:
|
That's right, when XP came out I grabbed my old 286 and it just worked!
|
286 date of release: February 1982
Windows XP date of release: October 2001
Pentium 4 date of release: November 2000
Windows Vista date of release: July 2005
How fair is your comparison, 26 year old processor won't run XP, blame goes on XP. 8 year old PC won't run a 3 year old Vista, Vista emerges completely faultless. I think you should revise your grade 3 Maths book, getting a bit rusty with the substractions.