Emuforums.com - View Single Post - Because Bioshock protection was a WINNER. Right?

Thanakil · May 8th, 2008

I do think the stupid copy protection comes from the publisher, I think that it was confirmed to be the case with Bioshock. The game was already lucky to be "alive" since no-one wanted to take the risk and let it be develop, so it wasn't that surprising to see the publisher take no risk and put some crappy protection on it, to try and be "safe". Even if in the end they hindered the sales more than anything with it.

May 8th, 2008	#21 (permalink)
Thanakil Is my post too short? Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: mtl,qc Posts: 1,880	I do think the stupid copy protection comes from the publisher, I think that it was confirmed to be the case with Bioshock. The game was already lucky to be "alive" since no-one wanted to take the risk and let it be develop, so it wasn't that surprising to see the publisher take no risk and put some crappy protection on it, to try and be "safe". Even if in the end they hindered the sales more than anything with it. __________________ The world will end with robots killing us all. And you know what? We'll be too busy thinking "HOLY S*** THAT'S SO COOL" to do anything about it.