View Single Post
Old May 7th, 2008   #43 (permalink)
cottonvibes
NGemu's Kawaii Imoutochan
 
cottonvibes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Super Mario World
Posts: 2,549
it seems here we have a contradictory ideas.


first someone mentions that there are no applications that take advantage from 4-8 cores.

then later when someone mentions there are apps that take advantage of 4-8 cores, and they're called "un-optimized."


so it seems no matter what is said, some people just won't accept that multi-cores are a good thing...


i don't understand why theres so much hate about multiple cores.
it dosn't matter if the multiple cores will only be used for 1% of the time, they're still a good thing.

if you had the choice between a 2-cored processor @ 4ghz, and a 8-cored processor @ 4ghz, you'd be a fool to choose the 2-cored processor.

obviously with the law of diminishing returns, the more cores a processor has, the less performance increase it gets.
But thats not to say that 8-cores are "useless."

and the faster we get 8-cored processors on the market, the faster coders can start experimenting with the benefits of the extra cores.

no-one is making you people buy the 8-core processors.
if you're happy with your single and dual-cored processors, stick to your core2duos and Pentium 4s,
__________________
PC Specs: AMD X2 4400+ @ 2.921 Ghz, 1.47 vCore | G92 8800 GTS 512mb @ 740/1944| 4GB Dual Channel OCZ Memory @ 835 Mhz (5-4-4-15-2T) | 700 Watt PSU | DVD-RW Drive | 500 GB Hitachi SATA II Hard Drive, 30 GB & 40 GB Western Digital IDE Hard Drives | 1920x1080 40" LCD Flat Pannel HDTV monitor |
Consoles: 1 PS3 (60 GB), 2 PS2s, 1 PS, 3 GBAs, 1 GB, and 1 old school NES

Having troubles with PCSX2? Check out my guide to get it running correctly.
Running PCSX2 Guide for Noobs
cottonvibes is offline   Reply With Quote