View Single Post
Old April 9th, 2008   #19 (permalink)
emwearz
Moderator
 
emwearz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 3,424
Quote:
Only 64 and the card performs almost on par with a 128 SP G92!
If I recall your scores got raped by mine and my card has a 112 SP. (And you have a much better CPU then me though I have no idea if you had the xeon during those tests).

Your card
Quote:
1024 x 768:
Max FPS: 60
Min FPS: 40
Average FPS: 52

1280 x 1024:
Max FPS: 45
Min FPS: 30
Average FPS: 36
My Card
Quote:
1024 x 768:
Max FPS: 76.81
Min FPS: 38.59
Average FPS: 58.74

1280 x 1024:
Max FPS: 55.85
Min FPS: 37.54
Average FPS: 47.19
In shader extensive games, especially when the res is pumped up, the 9600GT falls behind.

As for the renaming, how lame, but you cant really blame them, as long as theres no price hike, who really cares, my feelings from the start have been the 8800GT/S should have been marketed at G9 cards.
__________________

- No Jobs On A Dead Planet -
Welcome to EMerica .:|:. You're mine now


» Intel Core 2 Duo E6300 B2 Stepping @3.3 Ghz | Asus 8800GT 512MB PhysX enabled @700/1750/975 MHz | 2GB OCZ DDR2 800 «
» Asus P5B Vanilla | Thermaltake Soprano | Thermaltake Big Typhoon VX «

» Beta Tester for nullDC «
emwearz is offline   Reply With Quote