View Single Post
Old March 20th, 2008   #17 (permalink)
runawayprisoner
Mobile Fanatic
 
runawayprisoner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Santa Cruz, CA
Posts: 4,402
Ehh... any proofs to back up what you claimed? I have proofs for the other way around.

Anyway, I'm not comparing XP vs Vista. Performance-wise, Vista DX9 loses to XP DX9 already... and that's not a driver issue. I mean... you can argue that DirectX 10 drivers haven't matured yet, but what are you going to say about DirectX 9 drivers? That's one thing. I can also run Windows Vista with a Celeron processor (single core), 1 gig of RAM, and with an Intel graphics processor, too. And of course it's not going to degrade your performance so drastically it's noticeable. And I'm not bashing anything here, just stating the fact that Windows Vista degrades performance to the point where the gain from DirectX 10 is not even comparable to DirectX 9 under Windows XP.
__________________
Computer specs:
CPU: Intel Celeron M 450MHz
RAM: 1GB DDR2 100MHz
Storage: 4GB SSD + 8GB SDHC
Monitor: 7" LCD WVGA 800x480
OS: Windows XP Professional w/ SP3

Road warrior operation duration: 4h30m! (extendable to 6h30m!)
runawayprisoner is offline   Reply With Quote