Quote:
Originally Posted by SCHUMI-4-EVA
It feels so wrong that they are dominating though...
Afterall AMD can't help it that their X2's are not better than C2D's....as C2D's came out a year later...
Only when your new product comes out just after the competition or before it can you feel good about beating the compatiton...if it's only a year later that you have an answer then that's pretty darn sad...no matter how good it may be.
I mean Intel in this case had plenty of time to observe X2's and improve upon them...whilst AMD were struggeling with their stupid purchase of ATI.
|
if amd planned their R and D better they might have had a better chance
and AMD and Intel have different technology,
only one can win and that's intel now
Intel deserves to because they provide a better faster, more reliable, more energy efficient solution to a market problem
like in wildlife it's survival of the fittest and intel is a better evolution of the cpu architecture just now
I don't care who wins, if AMD releases the denub and propus processors tomorrow then intel can run and jump for me to provide nehalem....then i'll choose the best
I honestly find it a little sad that you have such an affinity for a company,
really, I can't understand why, it confuses me that someone would purposely do something that impairs their benifit without getting something in return
