View Single Post
Old June 18th, 2007   #96 (permalink)
Watermark
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Perkinston
Posts: 29
Quote:
Originally Posted by hajime View Post
Hi mates, I am thinking in buying one of two laptops which capabilities I am going to post.
I have the doubt in what is more important, the CPU or the Graphic card.

PC #1:
Intel Core 2 Duo T7600 2.33GHz, 4MB Cache
NVIDIA GeForce Go 7600 256MB
1GB DDR2 667MHz (512MB x2)


PC #2:
2.00ghz CPU Core 2 duo
256MB NVIDIA® GeForce™ 7900 GS graphics card, PCI-Express x16
2 GIG DDR Memory


Which one do you think would work better with PCSX2?
Thanks for the help!!!!
I'd personally recommend the second one. A 2.00 GHZ Core 2 should be able to emulate the CPU of the PS2 at full spped (I think), and the 7900 will do the graphics much better than the 7600.

Quote:
Originally Posted by hajime View Post
Thanks so much!
Then... the CPU power is not so important?
Not as important as the Videocard? I thought it was the reverse...
It really depends on what games you like to play, and the amount of graphics they require. The GPU is specialized, so it's about 10 times more powerful than a CPU. But if you aren't using the graphics to the full, then you're just wasting money. A Core 2 Duo in itself is just so powerful that it's frivolous to worry about a minor MHZ difference.

I can get away with crappy graphics because I mostly play older games and newer games that run on a 945G, and whenever I want to play brand new games I can usually don't mind having it look like crap. But looking at Oblivion screenshots on an 8800... *sigh*

Last edited by Watermark; June 18th, 2007 at 00:53.. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Watermark is offline   Reply With Quote